Boeing Warns Airlines of VNAV Software Glitch on 737 MAX Flight Navigation

A software fault on some 737 MAX aircraft can disconnect vertical navigation guidance after a missed approach and a programmed route change. Boeing says the...

Article Updates1 update
Oct 10, 2026Latest

On October 2, 2026, the FAA’s Corrective Action Review Board determined that the Boeing 737 MAX VNAV software glitch does not pose a safety concern, finding that pilots retain control and cockpit indications are clear. The finding clears the way for the delayed 737 MAX 10 certification process to resume.

  • The glitch can occur during a go-around or missed approach after pilots change a preprogrammed flight path, causing VNAV to disengage during a subsequent approach.
  • The FAA found no need to ground the 737 MAX fleet. On September 30, 2026, U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said the software update “hasn’t been flagged for us as a safety issue.”
  • Boeing said the issue affects flight-management computer software versions 14 and 14.1 and is developing a permanent software update while working with airlines on operating procedures.
Key Takeaways
  • Boeing says a software fault can disconnect vertical guidance after a missed approach and route change on some 737 MAX aircraft.
  • The autopilot remains available, and Boeing says existing procedures and pilot training cover landings without VNAV.
  • The FAA is reviewing the issue; Boeing is preparing a software fix, first expected in early 2028.

Boeing warned airlines in late August 2026 that a software fault on some 737 MAX aircraft could disengage vertical navigation guidance after a missed approach and a change to the programmed route. The company said pilots could lose automated guidance in a specific landing scenario. The autopilot itself continues to function.

The Federal Aviation Administration is reviewing the issue with the manufacturer and airlines. It plans to convene a Corrective Action Review Board, the agency said.

Boeing Warns Airlines of VNAV Software Glitch on 737 MAX Flight Navigation
Boeing Warns Airlines of VNAV Software Glitch on 737 MAX Flight Navigation

The potential fault appears during a demanding sequence. Pilots fly a precision approach, abort the landing, then alter the aircraft’s pre-programmed flight path; under those conditions, the flight management computer can disconnect vertical guidance, known as VNAV.

That can happen at low altitude. Boeing said existing pilot procedures address the situation, and pilots train to land without that guidance.

“We shared information with operators that reinforced existing pilot procedures for safely handling such cases. Our engineers are working on a software update to permanently address the issue.”

The company tied the problem to versions 14 and 14.1 of the flight management computer operating system. It has told operators about the issue and is preparing revised pilot guidance alongside a software correction.

A route change after a missed approach can drop vertical guidance

The fault concerns vertical navigation, not a complete loss of aircraft control. The autopilot remains available, according to Boeing, while the crew may have to fly without the automated vertical guidance function during the affected scenario.

The sequence involves a crew changing the programmed flight path after going around from an approach. The flight computer can then cause vertical guidance to disengage. Boeing described the risk as limited to a specific landing scenario, rather than a problem present throughout a flight.

The company’s initial bulletin characterized the glitch as not an immediate safety risk. Boeing said pilots already have procedures for handling such cases, and flight crews are trained to land without VNAV.

The FAA also said it is monitoring the problem and working with the company and airlines. The agency’s review could lead to further action if it identifies a safety concern.

“The FAA is aware of a potential issue in a software update for the flight computers on certain Boeing 737 MAX airplanes and is working closely with Boeing and the airlines.”

The agency said it would convene a Corrective Action Review Board (CARB) and take immediate action if it identifies a safety concern. That review is now part of the response alongside Boeing’s software work.

Four U.S. carriers say their current aircraft avoid the affected software

The carriers’ statements distinguish aircraft already in service from future deliveries. Their current fleets, they said, are not operating with the affected software versions.

AirlineCurrent fleet positionNew-aircraft position
SouthwestSays its fleet is not affected; none is equipped with Version U.14Will not accept aircraft with the affected software and wants an earlier version
UnitedSays its current fleet is not affectedWill not accept aircraft with the affected software and wants an earlier version
AlaskaSays its current fleet is not affectedNo additional delivery position stated
AmericanSays its current fleet is not affectedNo additional delivery position stated

Southwest and United have told the manufacturer they want new aircraft delivered with an earlier software version rather than the affected one. Alaska and American also said their current aircraft are not affected.

The statements address those airlines’ fleets, not every aircraft in service worldwide. The software issue is linked to particular computer-system versions, rather than being reported across all aircraft of the type.

The company learned of the problem in 2024 and first targeted 2028 for a fix

Boeing said it learned of the glitch in November 2024. In February 2025, it determined the issue was not a safety concern, according to the company’s account.

After receiving additional feedback from airlines, Boeing began a formal review in September 2026 and shared its findings with the FAA. The manufacturer informed all 737 operators in late August 2026, nearly two years after first learning about the problem.

The permanent software fix had originally been expected in early 2028. Boeing is now working to accelerate the correction, while preparing updated pilot guidance for operators.

The longer timetable gives the FAA’s review and the manufacturer’s revision work a role in the next steps. The agency has said it will act immediately if its review identifies a safety concern.

The issue could also affect certification timing for the 737 MAX 10 and the introduction of the MAX 7. Those aircraft programs add a separate schedule concern as Boeing works on the navigation software fix.

Keep reading

More in Airlines →

People also ask

Answers from VisaVerge guides
How did the January 2024 Alaska Airlines incident affect other airlines operating Boeing 737 MAX planes?

The January 2024 Alaska Airlines incident led to a temporary grounding of all MAX 9 planes in the United States, affecting airlines that heavily relied on the MAX 9 for their operations.

Read: United vs American vs Alaska: Who Leads with the Boeing 737 MAX?
When did the FAA start reviewing Boeing's enhanced alerting system for the 737 MAX 10?

The FAA started reviewing Boeing’s proposed enhanced flight crew alerting system for the 737 MAX 10 on December 12, 2025.

Read: FAA Reviews Boeing's Enhanced MAX 10 Alerting System for Certification
What technical issue caused the delay in Boeing 737 MAX 7 certification?

The certification was delayed due to an engine anti-ice concern flagged by the FAA, related to a potential risk to passenger safety via airflow disruption or decompression.

Read: Southwest 737 MAX 7 Certification Expected in 2026, Service Later
What did Boeing agree to in July 2024 regarding the 737 MAX case?

In July 2024, Boeing had agreed to plead guilty to criminal fraud conspiracy and pay a fine of up to $487.2 million.

Read: DOJ signals Boeing 737 MAX fraud trial may end in settlement
How did the FAA respond to the door plug incident involving Boeing's 737 MAX 9?

The FAA grounded all 737 MAX 9 planes for inspections and implemented new safety protocols before allowing flights to resume.

Read: Alaska Airlines Flight Attendants Sue Boeing Over Door Plug Incident
What do you think? 0 reactions
Useful? 0%
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Jim Grey

Jim Grey serves as Senior Editor at VisaVerge.com, where he leads the site's aviation and air-travel coverage — airlines, airports, TSA rules, and the operational disruptions that affect millions of journeys. With a keen eye for detail and deep knowledge of the travel sector, Jim ensures every report is accurate, timely, and genuinely useful to travelers. His guidance keeps VisaVerge readers informed and prepared from booking to boarding.

Oliver Mercer

As Chief Editor at VisaVerge.com, Oliver Mercer steers the site's editorial direction with a particular focus on Canadian and Oceania immigration — from Express Entry and provincial programs to Australian and New Zealand visa routes. He curates and edits content, guides the writing team, and safeguards factual accuracy across every article. Under Oliver's leadership, VisaVerge has become a trusted source for clear, comprehensive immigration guidance.