- The IRS expects to announce a revised Voluntary Disclosure Program later in 2026.
- The draft would replace the 75% civil-fraud penalty with a 20% accuracy-related penalty for each year in the six-year disclosure period.
- Conditional approval could start a three-month compliance deadline for filing returns, paying amounts due, and signing agreements.
The IRS is preparing a revised Voluntary Disclosure Program (VDP), but taxpayers who come forward could still face criminal exposure. IRS Criminal Investigation said in August 2026 that it was finalizing the overhaul, with an official announcement expected later in 2026.
The proposal would ease some penalties and simplify the application. It would not guarantee immunity from prosecution. Disclosure could still require taxpayers to reveal conduct that the government might view as intentional.
Free toolCSPA Age-Out Calculator Online
As of October 7, 2026, the overhaul had not been described as formally implemented. The IRS’s final rules will determine the protection available.
The draft would also demand fast action after conditional approval. Taxpayers could have three months to file delinquent or amended returns, pay outstanding amounts and sign required agreements.
The draft removes an express admission but not the disclosure burden
The planned revision would remove the willfulness checkbox from Form 14457. That certification characterized a taxpayer’s conduct as an “intentional, purposeful, or deliberate violation” of tax law.
Critics have argued that such language could provide evidence for a criminal case. Removing it would avoid asking applicants to make that express certification, but it would not prevent their disclosures from describing facts that could suggest deliberate conduct.
The American Bar Association urged the IRS to keep taxpayers with potential criminal exposure eligible, even when the facts might be treated as evidence of willfulness. The proposal’s ultimate eligibility rules remain unsettled.
That distinction leaves applicants weighing what they must disclose against the risk that the details could be used to assess intent. The revised process would not automatically erase that risk.
One submission would start a three-month compliance clock
The IRS proposes combining preclearance and preliminary acceptance into one application. Applicants would submit a single form rather than move through those stages separately.
Conditional approval would trigger the proposed three-month period. Taxpayers would generally need to file amended or delinquent returns, pay tax, penalties and interest, and execute required agreements within that window.
The agency also proposes a 120-day target for resolving accepted cases. That is a target, not a guarantee that every case would close within that period.
The American Bar Association said three months could be unrealistic. Applicants may need to rebuild records, prepare returns covering multiple years, calculate offshore reporting penalties, raise funds and negotiate payment arrangements before the deadline.
Penalty relief would come with separate foreign-reporting charges
The proposal would replace the 75% civil-fraud penalty with a 20% accuracy-related penalty for each year in the six-year disclosure period. The reduction could lower the civil bill for eligible participants.
Foreign-account and information-reporting penalties would follow separate rules. Amended Reports of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts would carry per-year penalties adjusted for inflation.
Penalties for international information returns would be capped at $10,000 per year. Those proposed limits do not resolve the overall cost for a taxpayer whose disclosure involves several years, unpaid tax, interest and multiple reporting obligations.
Record reconstruction and cash access could determine who can participate
The short deadline and payment terms could present different obstacles. Taxpayers may have to assemble years of financial records while preparing returns and calculating foreign reporting exposure.
The proposal also requires full payment of tax, penalties and interest within the compliance period. Taxpayers with substantial available funds may be able to meet that condition upfront. People with limited liquidity could be unable to secure the program’s potential criminal protection, even if they are willing to disclose and correct their filings.
The American Bar Association’s concern includes the work needed to raise money and arrange payment, not only the preparation of returns. Applicants could face several tasks at once, with the proposed deadline running after conditional approval.
Eligibility and protection await the IRS announcement
The final version will set the application language, eligibility standards, deadlines and scope of criminal protection. Until then, the proposed penalty reductions and process changes are not settled program terms.
Potential applicants would need to assess whether their conduct might be viewed as willful, whether they can prepare required returns and international information forms within three months, and what their six-year tax, interest and penalty exposure would be. They would also have to consider whether full payment is realistic.
Other possible routes include a nonwillful certification or amended-return filing. The appropriate choice depends on the facts and the taxpayer’s ability to meet the disclosure, filing, payment and agreement requirements.
The IRS expects to announce the final program later in 2026. The details released then will determine how the revised process treats applicants whose disclosures raise questions about intent.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute tax advice. Consult a qualified tax professional or CPA about your specific situation.