- Spain’s National Court widened the Schengen visa racket probe to examine BLS International’s appointment and document handling.
- Authorities allege families paid up to €25,000 per family for visas, residence permits, and self-employment work permits.
- The case remains open as of August 24, 2026, with five suspected offenses under review.
Spain’s Audiencia Nacional has widened a criminal investigation into an alleged Schengen visa racket at the Spanish consulate in Algiers to examine BLS International’s role in appointment scheduling and document processing. Families allegedly paid as much as €25,000 for visas and other permits.
Judge María Tardón of Juzgado Central de Instrucción No. 3 is directing the case. The inquiry began after two consular employees were arrested in April 2026.
Free toolSchengen Short-Stay Visa Calculator
Authorities arrested Vicente Moreno, the consulate’s chancellor and second-in-command, and Mohamed Boutouchent, a local employee. The arrests brought the alleged network inside the consulate into the court’s focus.
Judicial sources say the investigation now refers to processing platforms such as BLS. They allege that unverified, altered, or falsified documents entered applications handled through the system.
| India | China | ROW | |
|---|---|---|---|
| EB-1 | Oct 15, 2022 | Jul 01, 2023 | Current |
| EB-2 | Unavailable | Sep 01, 2021 | Current |
| EB-3 | Jan 01, 2014 | Jan 01, 2022 | Sep 01, 2024 |
| F-1 | Jan 22, 2020 ▲403d | Jan 22, 2020 ▲403d | Jan 22, 2020 ▲403d |
| F-2A | Aug 22, 2026 ▲31d | Aug 22, 2026 ▲31d | Aug 22, 2026 ▲31d |
BLS said it “categorically” rejects any involvement in the alleged €25,000 scheme. The company said its role remains “strictly administrative,” while Spanish diplomatic and consular authorities alone decide whether to approve or refuse a visa.
The court is examining permits beyond ordinary tourist visas
The alleged network concerned more than short-stay travel documents. Officials say it may have profited from fraudulent Schengen visas, residence permits, and self-employment work permits.
The applicants were Algerian citizens who allegedly did not meet the formal requirements for those documents. Families reportedly paid up to €25,000 per family to obtain access to the process.
Some proceeds allegedly moved into Spain through vehicle purchases, according to the account of the investigation. The court is also examining whether intermediaries helped prepare applications and identified families that had paid.
The alleged conduct remains unproven. The case is still at the investigation stage.
Five offenses define the current criminal inquiry
The court has identified five offense categories in this phase of the case:
- Money laundering.
- Crimes against the rights of foreign nationals.
- Continuous falsification of documents by a public official.
- Influence peddling.
- Membership in a criminal organization.
The allegations combine suspected document fraud with claims that public officials and outside service structures may have worked together. The inquiry does not establish that every person or company under examination committed an offense.
Moreno’s position inside the consulate is central to the public account of the case. Boutouchent was identified as a local employee. Both were arrested in Spain in April 2026.
The inquiry reaches the administrative layer of visa processing
The court is examining companies that provide administrative services, including appointment scheduling and document management. Investigators are also looking at whether employees helped prepare applications or selected families who had paid.
That focus places the agency’s alleged role before the consular decision itself. Appointment access and file preparation can support a visa application, but Spanish authorities retain the power to grant or refuse the document.
Spain’s Foreign Ministry awarded the company a contract in 2016 to manage visa appointments and document processing at selected Spanish consulates worldwide. The contract was reported at €175 million.
The arrangement reflects a division of functions. Private providers can handle administrative tasks at designated locations, while consular officials make the sovereign decision on visa adjudication.
Judicial sources described the suspected outside structures as “processing platforms such as BLS.” The court is assessing whether any employees or associated service arrangements crossed that administrative boundary.
BLS faces scrutiny without a reported finding of liability
BLS said the investigation contains no evidence establishing wrongdoing by the company or its employees in relation to visa issuance. It also said all approvals and refusals rest solely with the relevant diplomatic and consular authorities.
The agency’s response contests both its alleged involvement and any suggestion that it controlled visa outcomes. Its position is that its functions were limited to administrative handling.
The current case describes an investigation, not a final finding of liability. No corporate conviction has been reported, and the materials do not reflect a final judicial determination against the company.
Reports of the probe have nevertheless brought reputational and market pressure. The scrutiny centers on appointment and document-handling operations, rather than on the legal power to adjudicate visas.
That distinction is reflected in the company’s defense. BLS does not make the final consular decision, according to its public response.
The National Court investigation remains open as of August 24, 2026
The investigation followed official communications from the Spanish Embassy in Algeria, specifically from the Consejería de Interior. Those communications triggered the judicial inquiry into the alleged network.
As of August 24, 2026, the matter remained under investigation by Spain’s National Court. The court is examining whether employees or associated administrative structures participated in the alleged scheme.
The broader inquiry forms part of a crackdown tied to suspected irregularities in visa processing at the Spanish consulate. Its next legal significance will depend on what investigators establish about the documents, payments, and roles of the people and service providers under review.
This article provides general information and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified immigration attorney about your specific case.