Larry C. Conner Admits Role in $43M Abusive Trust Tax Shelter Scheme

Texas promoter Larry Conner pleaded guilty to a $43 million tax shelter scheme involving abusive trusts. Sentencing is set for January 26, 2027.

Key Takeaways
  • Texas man Larry Conner pleaded guilty to tax fraud involving a forty-three million dollar loss to the United States Treasury.
  • The scheme utilized abusive trust tax shelters to falsely shield one hundred fifty-six million dollars in taxable income.
  • Conner faces a maximum five-year prison sentence with a formal court sentencing hearing scheduled for January twenty-sixth, twenty twenty-seven.

Larry C. Conner, a 69-year-old man from Frisco, Texas, pleaded guilty August 12, 2026, to conspiring to defraud the United States through an abusive trust tax shelter that caused an estimated $43 million tax loss. The Justice Department announced the plea August 13, 2026.

The promoter admitted selling the arrangement to taxpayers nationwide and using it himself. He faces a maximum of five years in prison.

Free toolCSPA Age-Out Calculator Online
Larry C. Conner Admits Role in M Abusive Trust Tax Shelter Scheme
Larry C. Conner Admits Role in $43M Abusive Trust Tax Shelter Scheme

The scheme ran from at least February 2018 through September 2023. Conner and others caused false returns to be filed for approximately $156 million in income, prosecutors said.

He also acknowledged using the structure from 2016 through 2021 to evade taxes on roughly $5.2 million of his own income. A federal district court judge is scheduled to sentence him January 26, 2027.

The charge is conspiracy to defraud the United States, an offense commonly brought under 18 U.S.C. § 371. The case was investigated by IRS Criminal Investigation.

The trust structure promised control while shifting reported income

Conner promoted the arrangement through The Business Solutions Group, which held in-person seminars around the country and in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico. Clients typically paid between $25,000 and $50,000 to establish the trusts and foundation.

The marketing slogan was “own nothing, control everything.” Promoters told high-net-worth business owners they could eliminate as much as 98% of their tax liability while retaining control of their assets.

The system used several layers. Clients were instructed to route income through three purported “non-grantor” trusts and a so-called “private family foundation.”

The filings also claimed deductions for personal living expenses that were not deductible and for charitable contributions prosecutors described as bogus. The structure therefore affected both the reporting of income and the expenses taxpayers claimed against it.

The Justice Department’s Office of Public Affairs said Conner received repeated warnings before continuing to promote the shelters.

“Conner admitted that he knew the tax shelters he promoted were fraudulent based on repeated warnings he received from attorneys and accountants. and his knowledge and receipt of materials that the IRS publishes to educate the public about the illegal nature of abusive trust tax shelters.”

The admission described a promoter who had access to professional warnings and IRS educational materials while continuing to market the arrangement.

The operation relied on promoters, preparers and financial professionals

The investigation identified a network that helped market, document and administer the structure. Timothy McPhee and Marcia Predmore, a Colorado couple, helped host seminars. McPhee is serving a 151-month prison sentence for his role.

Weldon Wulstein, a Nevada-based CPA, prepared hundreds of false tax returns for clients. Suzanne Thompson, a Wyoming-based bookkeeper, prepared fraudulent financial statements.

Roderick Prescott, a Mesquite, Nevada man, promoted the private family foundation layer. Kent Ellsworth, an Arizona-based tax preparer, also participated in the network.

The roles covered the scheme’s main operating needs. Some participants promoted the structure directly, while others prepared returns or produced financial records used to support it.

Chief Jim Lee of IRS Criminal Investigation has emphasized in related convictions that agents will “hold those involved in abusive tax shelter schemes accountable.” The agency’s investigation into the trust arrangement produced a case involving both the people who sold it and the taxpayers whose income passed through it.

Conner’s own tax reporting formed part of the guilty plea

Conner was not only a promoter. He admitted applying the same structure to his personal income during a five-year period.

That income totaled roughly $5.2 million between 2016 and 2021. His admission tied his personal tax reporting to the arrangement he marketed to clients.

The government’s case also alleged that the broader operation used the purported trusts and foundation to make taxable income appear shielded and to support deductions that taxpayers could not lawfully claim. False returns covered approximately $156 million in income.

The figures show the difference between the scheme’s reach and the loss calculated by the government. Taxpayers reported approximately $156 million through the structure, while the resulting loss to the U.S. Treasury reached about $43 million.

Conner’s sentencing will follow the guilty plea. The scheduled date is January 26, 2027, and the statutory maximum remains five years in prison.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute tax advice. Consult a qualified tax professional or CPA about your specific situation.

People also ask

Answers from VisaVerge guides
Who was indicted for running a Ponzi scheme in December 2023?

Siddharth Jawahar, an Indian-American former investment advisor from Texas, was indicted for running a $35 million Ponzi scheme.

Read: Siddharth Jawahar: Indian-American’s Ponzi Luxury Scam Unveiled
What is the potential impact of tax evasion cases like this one on taxpayers?

Tax evasion can have a negative impact on taxpayers as it deprives public services of essential funding, according to HMRC officials.

Read: British Indian Dentist Receives Tax Fraud Conviction and HMRC Penalties for Tax Evasion
What are the potential criminal consequences of tax evasion for individuals?

Criminal Tax Evasion can result in fines up to $100,000 and up to 5 years in prison, plus costs of prosecution in many cases.

Read: Penalties, Interest, and Immigration Consequences of Tax Noncompliance
What is the penalty for tax evasion due to fraud according to IRC § 6663?

The penalty for tax evasion due to fraud under IRC § 6663 can be up to 75% of the portion of the underpayment attributable to fraud.

Read: Understanding IRC Fraud Penalties and Tax Evasion Consequences
What are the potential consequences of tax evasion for L1 visa holders?

L1 visa holders who engage in tax evasion may face civil and criminal penalties, including fines, imprisonment, deportation, denial of re-entry, and financial burdens such as back taxes with interest.

Read: Tax Evasion Consequences for L1 Visa Holders
What do you think? 0 reactions
Useful? 0%
Nadia Hassan

Nadia Hassan covers immigration policy and legislation for VisaVerge.com, decoding the bills, executive actions, agency rule changes, and fee structures that reshape the system. With a sharp eye for how Washington's decisions reach ordinary applicants, she translates dense policy into practical context. Nadia's analysis gives readers the "what it means for you" behind every major immigration announcement.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments