Eswatini Takes 2 More US Deportees Under Third-Country Deal

Eswatini said it received two more U.S. deportees on August 27, 2026, under its third-country deal. The government calls the custody temporary, but rights...

Key Takeaways
  • Eswatini received two more deportees from the United States on August 27, 2026, bringing the latest batch under the deal.
  • The government says the transfers are temporary, but rights groups question detention conditions and legal access for earlier arrivals.
  • The arrangement has now moved more than 30 people, with payment reported at about $5.1 million.

Eswatini said on August 27, 2026, that it received two more third-country nationals deported from the United States. The arrivals marked the fifth batch sent under the bilateral arrangement since the first group reached the kingdom in July 2025.

The government described the men as Latin American. It did not disclose their nationalities or say how long they would remain.

Eswatini Takes 2 More US Deportees Under Third-Country Deal
Eswatini Takes 2 More US Deportees Under Third-Country Deal

The transfers have now exceeded 30 people. The latest pair are the newest US deportees sent to the southern African kingdom under the third-country deal.

Rights groups and lawyers have challenged the arrangement. They say some people remain detained there after completing their U.S. criminal sentences.

The government says the migrants are being held temporarily. It expects them to return to their countries of origin.

Two earlier transfers have already left the kingdom

On August 18, 2026, the government said two previously transferred migrants had gone home. It identified their destinations as Mauritania and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Acting government spokesperson Thabile Mdluli said the Mauritanian national sought voluntary repatriation. The man also wanted to reunite with his family.

“following his request for voluntary repatriation and his expressed desire to reunite with his family”

Mdluli’s statement concerned the earlier departures. The government has continued describing the remaining transfers as temporary while it arranges returns.

A court order followed a nine-month lawyer-access dispute

Amnesty International said on August 5, 2026, that four of the first people transferred from the United States lacked in-person access to a local lawyer for nine months. The Supreme Court later upheld an order requiring that access.

Pro-democracy and civil rights groups have opposed the arrangement through protests, lawsuits and public statements. Their objections focus on detention conditions and the treatment of people whose U.S. criminal sentences have ended.

The government’s latest announcement did not identify the new arrivals. Their Latin American description leaves their citizenships undisclosed.

The arrangement combines payments with a temporary-transfer promise

Program elementReported detail
Payment associated with the arrangement$5.1 million
Planned capacityUp to 160 deportees
Government description of custodyTemporary, pending return arrangements
Stated use of fundsManaging the program and strengthening border and migration capacity

The payment figure has two related descriptions. The agreement has been reported as valued at $5.1 million, while the government has said it received about $5.1 million from the Trump administration for program management and migration capacity.

Men transferred earlier came from Vietnam, Jamaica, Cuba, Yemen and other countries. The arrangement forms part of a wider U.S. practice of sending some migrants to third countries when their governments will not accept them.

The new arrivals therefore extend an existing policy, rather than opening a new transfer route. The fifth batch also shows that the arrangement remains operational.

The transfers fit a wider payment-backed removal policy

A Senate Foreign Relations Committee minority report found at least $32.3 million in direct payments to five foreign governments for third-country deportation arrangements as of January 2026.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security defended such agreements in a statement addressing their legal and security rationale.

“These third-country agreements, which ensure due process under the US Constitution, are essential to the safety of our homeland and the American people”

The statement contrasts with the access dispute documented by Amnesty International. That organization said the Supreme Court order ultimately required in-person legal access for four early arrivals.

The latest transfer keeps the agreement active as of August 28, 2026. The government continues to frame the custody as temporary, with repatriation arrangements pending.

This article provides general information and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified immigration attorney about your specific case.

People also ask

Answers from VisaVerge guides
How many deportees has Eswatini confirmed under the U.S. deal?

Eswatini has confirmed the arrival of 10 more deportees, bringing the total to at least 15 people.

Read: Eswatini confirms 10 more deportees under U.S. deal
How many men were deported to Eswatini by the U.S. in July 2025?

In July 2025, the U.S. reportedly deported five men with criminal histories to Eswatini under related arrangements.

Read: Trump administration Plans Deportation of Abrego Garcia to Eswatini, Not El Salvador
How much money did the United States give Eswatini to accept deportees?

The United States gave Eswatini $5.1 million to accept up to 160 deportees.

Read: Eswatini confirms over $5m from US to accept deportees
When did the U.S. send deportees to Eswatini under this program?
Why did the US choose Eswatini for these deportations?

Eswatini was chosen because it is a country that promised not to persecute or torture the deportees, even though they have no ties to that country.

Read: US Expands Deportations, Sends Migrants to Eswatini Amid Campaign
What do you think? 0 reactions
Useful? 0%
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Nadia Hassan

Nadia Hassan covers immigration policy and legislation for VisaVerge.com, decoding the bills, executive actions, agency rule changes, and fee structures that reshape the system. With a sharp eye for how Washington's decisions reach ordinary applicants, she translates dense policy into practical context. Nadia's analysis gives readers the "what it means for you" behind every major immigration announcement.