- Ulises Peña López sued the U.S. government alleging violent abuse and medical neglect during immigration detention.
- The lawsuit claims agents left him seriously disabled following an arrest in February twenty twenty-five.
- Defendants include DHS, ICE, and private operators GEO Group and CoreCivic for civil rights violations.
Ulises Peña López sued the U.S. government on July 6, 2026, alleging that immigration agents beat him during an arrest and that months of ICE detention left him seriously disabled. His wife, Aby Peña, and their daughter joined the lawsuit.
The complaint seeks unspecified damages. It names the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, private detention operators GEO Group and CoreCivic, and other defendants tied to his custody.
Free toolCSPA Age-Out Calculator Online
Peña López worked as a carpenter in Sunnyvale before his arrest. The lawsuit says agents used force against him on February 21, 2025.
His family says he lost consciousness. The complaint also alleges that officials failed to provide adequate medical care during detention, allowing his health to deteriorate.
The lawsuit links the arrest to lasting disability
The family’s case describes a violent encounter followed by prolonged confinement. Its allegations include physical abuse during the arrest, medical neglect while Peña López remained in custody, and disability-rights violations.
The complaint also raises due process claims under the Fifth Amendment. Those claims challenge the procedures used during his detention and removal, alongside the allegations about his treatment.
The lawsuit invokes several legal authorities. They include the Federal Tort Claims Act, state and federal disability laws, and California’s Accountability in Detention Act.
Each claim presents a different legal theory. The tort claims concern alleged government wrongdoing, while the disability claims address the treatment of a person who the family says became seriously disabled in custody.
The case seeks financial compensation and accountability. It does not identify a dollar amount in the material describing the filing.
Peña López spent about eight months in custody before deportation
Peña López remained detained for about eight months after the February arrest. Immigration authorities deported him to Mexico in October 2025.
The deportation separated him from his family in the Bay Area. His wife and daughter are plaintiffs alongside him.
The complaint places the detention conditions at the center of the family’s claims. It alleges that the harm began with the arrest and continued through confinement, including the medical problems that the family says left him disabled.
The timing also forms part of the lawsuit’s account. Peña López’s detention lasted for months, and his removal came before the family filed the damages action in July 2026.
The defendants include federal agencies and private prison companies
The lawsuit names the Department of Homeland Security and ICE as defendants. It also names GEO Group and CoreCivic, two private companies identified in the filing as connected to detention operations.
That group of defendants reflects the different actors the family seeks to hold responsible. The complaint directs allegations at federal enforcement and detention institutions, as well as private companies involved in the custody system.
The filing relies on the Federal Tort Claims Act for part of its legal case. It separately cites disability protections and California law, creating multiple routes for the family’s claims.
The lawsuit asks for damages rather than only a change to future detention practices. Its allegations will have to be evaluated through the litigation process.
The family filed the case after Peña López’s removal
Advocates representing the family described the action as a federal lawsuit seeking damages and accountability for the arrest and detention conditions. The filing came after Peña López had already been deported to Mexico.
His family’s allegations cover both the initial use of force and the care he received afterward. They say the treatment during the arrest and confinement produced serious physical consequences.
The case therefore combines an arrest claim with detention-related allegations. It also asks the court to consider whether officials violated disability protections and constitutional due process while Peña López remained in custody.
The complaint’s outcome could depend on the evidence concerning the arrest, medical treatment, detention conditions and the roles of each named defendant. The lawsuit itself sets out allegations, not a final finding of liability.
Peña López’s removal does not end the damages claims described in the filing. The action continues to seek compensation for the alleged injuries and violations tied to his custody.
This article provides general information and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified immigration attorney about your specific case.
