- The European Commission rejected the Save Europe Act for discriminating against non-Western migrants based on race and origin.
- A separate digital rights initiative was approved for signature collection to oppose mandatory digital ID systems.
- Organizers of the rejected migration proposal had already gathered over 535,000 signatures on an independent platform.
The European Commission refused to register the Save Europe Act on July 22, 2026, saying its proposed moratorium on new non-Western immigration channels discriminated on the basis of race and ethnic origin.
The initiative sought to suspend new immigration routes, including study and family reunification visas. The Commission said the proposal conflicted with fundamental EU values and could not proceed under the European Citizens’ Initiative system.
Free toolUSCIS Receipt Number Decoder
Its decision cited Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union, Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and settled case-law. The legal test came before any formal EU signature campaign could begin.
The Commission also registered a separate initiative opposing digital identity and age-verification requirements for online services. That group now has six months to start a 12-month signature-collection period.
The migration initiative was organized by Eva Vlaardingerbroek, Martin Sellner and Dries Van Langenhove. Vlaardingerbroek is a Dutch political commentator and nationalist activist, Sellner leads Austria’s Identitarian Movement, and Van Langenhove is a Belgian activist and former Member of Parliament.
The Commission described the proposal’s central framework as incompatible with EU law.
“manifestly contrary to the values enshrined under the Treaty and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.”
The statement said the proposed moratorium relied on the “ethnic, cultural or civilizational origin” of the people affected rather than migration-management criteria. It therefore “would discriminate on the basis of race and ethnic origin.”
The decision referred to a September 6, 2017, judgment in Slovakia and Hungary v Council. That case-law supported the finding that migration measures cannot rest solely on ethnic origin.
The initiative stopped before the official signature threshold
Organizers said they had gathered more than 535,000 signatures through an independent platform before registration. They had planned to seek the formal threshold of 1 million signatures after receiving approval.
That approval did not come. Registration is the gateway to the formal collection process under the European Citizens’ Initiative framework.
Vlaardingerbroek called the decision an “outrageous violation of the democratic rights of the native peoples of Europe.” In a post on X, formerly Twitter, she added: “our mere existence is racist to them.”
Herman Tertsch, a member of the European Parliament, also criticized the decision. He said the Commission “only recognizes as Citizens’ Initiatives the NGOs of the far left.”
The organizers had tested the proposal publicly before the ruling. On July 15, they held a rally at Place du Luxembourg in Brussels.
Romain De Reusme, the Mayor of Ixelles, initially banned the gathering and called the group’s presence “democratic suicide.” Belgium’s Supreme Administrative Court, known as the Council of State, overturned the ban only hours before the rally, citing the right to peaceful assembly.
A digital-rights initiative cleared the same eligibility check
On the same day, the Commission registered “Stop Killing The Internet: No Digital ID & No Age Verification.” The initiative carries registration number ECI(2026)000011.
Its organizers want EU legislation requiring digital identity and age-assurance systems used to access online services to remain “voluntary, privacy-preserving, and non-discriminatory.” The Commission said the proposal met the formal admissibility conditions in the European Citizens’ Initiative Regulation.
Moritz-Maximilian Katzner is listed as the representative and director of the movement. David Frantisek Wagner is the substitute. Open Rights Group, Big Brother Watch and Index on Censorship are affiliated organizations.
The initiative was processed under Michael McGrath, the Commissioner for Democracy, Justice, the Rule of Law, and Consumer Protection, and Maroš Šefčovič, the Commissioner for Transparency.
The organizers must collect at least 1 million signatures from at least seven EU Member States during the 12-month campaign. They first have six months to begin that period.
The group emerged from the “Stop Killing Games” movement. That campaign reached 1.3 million signatures earlier in 2026, but the Commission declined to propose mandatory legislation and instead favored a voluntary industry code of conduct.
EU age checks are moving toward a 2026 rollout
The registration decision comes as the EU develops its own age-verification tools. The Commission made its age-verification blueprint available on 14 July 2025 and turned it into a feature-ready solution on 15 April 2026.
Member States are expected to roll out age-verification tools by the end of 2026. The proposed system would allow users to prove they are over 18 without disclosing other personal information.
The Commission says the technology is designed to protect privacy and work across systems. It is also intended to interoperate with future EU Digital Identity Wallets.
The registered initiative challenges mandatory or restrictive use of such systems. Its organizers frame the issue around voluntary participation, privacy safeguards and equal treatment.
The Commission’s age-verification policy is described on its official digital-strategy page.
The ruling draws a line around immigration criteria
The two decisions applied different outcomes to initiatives submitted under the same European framework. The migration proposal failed because the Commission found its category of migrants rested on ethnic, cultural or civilizational origin. The digital-rights proposal passed the eligibility check and can move toward signatures.
The rejected initiative’s wording referred to preserving the “ethnic and cultural continuity” of the “native peoples of Europe.” It also characterized migration by “demographic replacement” involving “non-Western” and “non-European” migrants.
The Commission’s reasoning treated those descriptions as the basis for the proposed policy, rather than as political messaging separate from the requested moratorium. The decision therefore tied the registration refusal to non-discrimination rules in EU primary law.
Van Langenhove’s role also carries a recent Belgian legal history. On May 13, 2026, he was convicted in Belgium of hate speech over remarks linking mass migration to crime.
Vlaardingerbroek faced a separate travel-related decision in January 2026, when the United Kingdom revoked her Electronic Travel Authorisation. UK officials said her presence was “not conducive to the public good.”
The Commission’s July 22 decision leaves the migration proposal outside the formal EU petition process, while the digital initiative can begin preparing its signature campaign within the six-month window.
