Chidimma Adetshina Challenges Deportation in Cape Town Regional Court Over Home Affairs Order

Former Miss South Africa finalist Chidimma Adetshina challenges a deportation order in court, seeking citizenship based on her birth in Soweto.

August 2026 Visa Bulletin
36 advanced 0 retrogressed F-2A Mexico ▲568d
Key Takeaways
  • Chidimma Adetshina is challenging a deportation order in the Cape Town Regional Court to remain in South Africa.
  • Home Affairs officials allege illegal entry and misrepresentation after her South African identity documents were revoked in twenty twenty-four.
  • Her legal team seeks citizenship based on her birth and eighteen-year residence under the South African Citizenship Act.

Chidimma Adetshina appeared in the Cape Town Regional Court on Monday to challenge a South African deportation order that could send her and her minor son to Nigeria and potentially bar her from returning.

The closed-door hearing resumed Monday, July 20, 2026, after proceedings began on Thursday, July 16, 2026. The case pits the former Miss South Africa finalist against the Department of Home Affairs over her right to remain in the country where she was born.

Chidimma Adetshina Challenges Deportation in Cape Town Regional Court Over Home Affairs Order
Chidimma Adetshina Challenges Deportation in Cape Town Regional Court Over Home Affairs Order

The department alleges illegal entry, unlawful residence and misrepresentation of nationality. Officials also say she has no valid South African residential status after authorities revoked her identity documents in late 2024.

Free toolUSCIS Receipt Number Decoder

The dispute reaches beyond immigration paperwork. Adetshina was born in Soweto to a Nigerian father and a Mozambican mother, and became a national flashpoint during the 2024 Miss South Africa pageant.

Home Affairs says Adetshina has no lawful status

Immigration officer Adrian Jackson said in an affidavit filed in June or July 2026 that database checks showed Adetshina “does not hold any lawful RSA [Republic of South Africa] residential status.” He also alleged that she had “wilfully and intentionally remained resident unlawfully” in the country.

August 2026 Final Action Dates
India China ROW
EB-1 Oct 15, 2022 Jul 01, 2023 ▲30d Current
EB-2 Unavailable Sep 01, 2021 Current
EB-3 Jan 01, 2014 Jan 01, 2022 ▲10d Sep 01, 2024 ▲31d
F-1 Dec 15, 2018 ▲317d Dec 15, 2018 ▲317d Dec 15, 2018 ▲317d
F-2A Jul 22, 2026 ▲567d Jul 22, 2026 ▲567d Jul 22, 2026 ▲567d

Jackson further alleged that Adetshina returned through the Lebombo border from Mozambique after presenting herself as a South African citizen, despite her prohibited status. The department is using that alleged re-entry as part of its case for removal.

Home Affairs Minister Leon Schreiber said authorities declared Adetshina a “prohibited person” under the Immigration Act on December 19, 2024. He said she failed to respond to a September 2024 notice that proposed cancelling her identity documents and those of her son.

Her South African identity document and passport were revoked after an investigation into her mother, Anabela Rungo. Authorities accuse Rungo of using identity theft to secure South African residency for her family years ago.

Rungo faces separate criminal charges tied to alleged identity fraud in 2001.

A rejected visa application adds another dispute

Schreiber also alleged in July 2026 that Adetshina obtained a Nigerian passport and later sought a South African visitor’s visa. Authorities denied that application after describing a bank statement submitted with it as “fraudulent.”

The department says the rejected visa left Adetshina without a lawful basis to stay. Schreiber said her son likewise has “no independent legal basis” to remain because her visa application failed.

The deportation order therefore covers both mother and child. Adetshina faces immediate removal proceedings and a possible permanent ban from South Africa.

She has asked critics on social media to “stop frustrating my life,” while maintaining that she wants to remain in the country of her birth.

Her lawyers are testing a citizenship route

Adetshina’s legal team is examining a provision in the South African Citizenship Act of 1995. The provision may allow people born in South Africa who lived there until age 18 to apply for citizenship, regardless of their parents’ immigration status.

That argument could place her birth and upbringing at the center of the case. It also raises a separate question from whether her mother obtained residency lawfully: whether Adetshina herself can qualify under a citizenship route available to people born in the country.

The material before the court includes competing accounts of her nationality and residence. The department alleges that she misrepresented her nationality at the border. Her legal team is pursuing a statutory basis for citizenship.

A court’s treatment of those issues may determine whether the deportation order proceeds or whether the case moves into a citizenship application process.

Pageant success made the immigration dispute public

Adetshina withdrew from the Miss South Africa contest in 2024 after public outcry over her heritage. She later represented Nigeria and won Miss Universe Nigeria 2024.

She became the first runner-up at the global Miss Universe 2024 pageant in Mexico. Her rise kept attention on the underlying citizenship dispute and on South Africa’s immigration enforcement system.

The case has also become associated with debates about xenophobia and national identity. Her supporters focus on her birth in Soweto and life in South Africa, while the department’s filings focus on documents, entry records and immigration status.

The court proceedings are continuing behind closed doors. The minor son remains named on the deportation order, and the possible citizenship application remains part of Adetshina’s legal strategy.

This article provides general information and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified immigration attorney about your specific case.

People also ask

Answers from VisaVerge guides
What was the legal challenge against Dr. Rasha Alawieh's deportation?

A federal judge issued an urgent order requiring 48 hours’ notice before proceeding with Dr. Rasha Alawieh’s deportation, but she was deported the next day despite the court order.

Read: Brown Professor Rasha Alawieh Held at Boston Airport Despite Valid Visa
What legal challenge was raised against the deportation of migrants to Ghana?

A lawsuit was filed on September 12, 2025 by Asian Americans Advancing Justice on behalf of five Nigerians and Gambians alleging multiple due process failures.

Read: Judge Refuses Relief for Ghana Deportees as Torture Fears Persist
Why is Bruna Caroline Ferreira facing deportation?

According to the Department of Homeland Security, Bruna Caroline Ferreira overstayed her B2 tourist visa after June 1999 and is now facing formal removal proceedings for deportation to Brazil.

Read: Authorities Investigate Bruna Caroline Ferreira, Revere, Massachusetts, South Louisiana ICE Processing Center
What was Vaneet Kaur Chadha banned from doing by Home Affairs?

Home Affairs banned Vaneet Kaur Chadha from providing immigration assistance for five years after cancelling her registration for serious misconduct.

Read: Home Affairs Bans Indian Immigration Agent Vaneet Kaur Chadha for Misleading Visa Filings
What triggered the clarification from South Africa’s Department of Home Affairs?

The clarification was issued to address confusion following Deputy Minister Njabulo Nzuza's comments on April 14, 2026, which were misinterpreted as indicating a new policy allowing ZEP holders direct access to permanent residency.

Read: Home Affairs Clarifies ZEP Status as Permanent Residency Claims Spark Confusion
What do you think? 0 reactions
Useful? 0%
Nadia Hassan

Nadia Hassan covers immigration policy and legislation for VisaVerge.com, decoding the bills, executive actions, agency rule changes, and fee structures that reshape the system. With a sharp eye for how Washington's decisions reach ordinary applicants, she translates dense policy into practical context. Nadia's analysis gives readers the "what it means for you" behind every major immigration announcement.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments