- Wyden and Neal criticized Treasury’s proposed rules, warning the scholarship tax credit could shift federal revenue away from public schools.
- Treasury estimates about ninety-six percent of children in participating states could meet the proposed income eligibility standard.
- States must opt in by January first, twenty twenty-seven, to participate in the program’s first year.
Sen. Ron Wyden and Rep. Richard Neal criticized Treasury’s proposed rules for the new Federal Scholarship Tax Credit in a letter to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on October 6, 2026. They argued the department’s interpretation could move federal tax revenue away from public schools.
The lawmakers called it a “blatant attempt” to steer taxpayer funds from public education. They warned the rules could “subsidize the private school education of children from wealthy families.”
Free toolSubstantial Presence Test Calculator
Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, is the Senate Finance Committee’s ranking member. Neal, a Massachusetts Democrat, ranks first among Democrats on the House Ways and Means Committee.
Their objection centers on access and oversight. The proposal could let families use scholarships at private and religious schools, while leaving states little room to narrow participation.
Eligibility could reach most children in participating states
A household could qualify with income up to three times the median income for its county or metropolitan area, adjusted for family size. Treasury and Education officials estimate approximately 96% of children in participating states could meet that standard.
That breadth concerns Democrats who say the program may benefit families who are not low-income. Rep. Gwen Moore, a Wisconsin Democrat, argued that directing the credit to private academies does not amount to an investment in public education.
The proposal also limits state authority over participating organizations and schools. States generally could not exclude specific scholarship-granting organizations, restrict eligible schools or expenses, or add certification standards intended to narrow participation.
Democratic Gov. J.B. Pritzker of Illinois has raised concerns about safeguards against discrimination and the program’s academic accountability. The rules allow scholarship money to cover private-school tuition, including at religious schools, as well as other eligible education costs.
Donors claim credits for contributions to scholarship groups
Congress enacted the program in 2025 through the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. It is scheduled to begin in 2027.
An individual may contribute up to $1,700 annually to a qualifying scholarship-granting organization and claim a dollar-for-dollar federal tax credit. The credit cannot exceed the donor’s federal income-tax liability.
Married couples filing jointly may claim up to $3,400. Scholarship organizations can support private-school tuition, certain home-school expenses and some expenses for public-school students.
The rules do not make the aid available nationwide automatically. A student can receive assistance only if the student’s state participates.
States face a January deadline to join the first program year
A governor, or another authority designated by state law, must opt in for each calendar year. States have until January 1, 2027, to join for the program’s first year.
Donations are also scheduled to begin January 1, 2027. Participating states must submit their lists of eligible scholarship organizations by February 15, 2027.
Treasury’s proposed regulations are undergoing a 60-day public-comment period before final rules are issued. State officials are assessing the rules as they consider whether to participate.
Governors weigh scholarship access against limits on state control
Opting in could bring scholarship money to residents, including contributions from taxpayers in other states. A state that declines could leave its families ineligible even as donors there give to organizations elsewhere.
Democratic governors in North Carolina, Virginia, Colorado and New York have indicated they intend to participate. They and other state officials continue to assess the final rules.
The Trump administration says the initiative will “supercharge” access to education options for millions of families. Democratic lawmakers argue the federal credit would subsidize private education without comparable support for public schools.
Teachers’ unions and public-school advocates warn that moving students into private education could reduce public-school funding tied to enrollment or attendance. The funding concern follows from how those allocations are linked to student counts.
Scholarship organizations must undergo annual audits of student-selection procedures and fund tracking. States are responsible for reviewing them.
