- The State Department expanded social media screening to 14 additional visa categories starting March 30, 2026.
- Applicants must disclose five years of handles and set all social media accounts to public visibility.
- Failure to comply or limited visibility could result in visa denials and future ineligibility for entry.
(UNITED STATES) — The U.S. Department of State expanded social media screening effective March 30, 2026, to K-1 fiancé visas, R-1 religious worker visas, and 12 additional visa categories, widening a vetting program that now reaches a broader range of applicants seeking entry to the United States.
The move marks the third and largest expansion of the social media vetting program to date. It adds fiancé visa, religious worker and other classifications to categories already covered in earlier phases rolled out in June 2025 and December 2025.
Under the latest expansion, the newly added categories include K-1, K-2 and K-3 visas; R-1 and R-2 visas; H-3; A-3 and C-3; G-5; Q; S; and T and U. Those groups now join H-1B and H-4 workers, as well as F, M and J visa applicants, who were already subject to social media vetting.
The State Department uses the screening to identify applicants who may be inadmissible to the United States because they pose threats to national security or public safety. The review also looks for hostility toward U.S. citizens, institutions, or founding principles, support for designated terrorist organizations, and antisemitic harassment or violence.
For many applicants, the practical effect is direct. People applying in the newly added categories now face the same disclosure rules that already applied to students, exchange visitors and some workers.
Applicants must disclose all social media usernames or handles from the past five years on the DS-160 visa application form. The State Department also requires applicants to adjust privacy settings on all social media accounts to “public” to facilitate vetting.
Consular officers have been instructed that limited social media visibility “could be construed as an effort to evade or hide certain activity.” Omitting social media information could lead to visa denial and ineligibility for future visas.
That instruction gives consular officers broad importance in how the policy is applied. Incomplete disclosure can become a ground for refusing a visa, and reduced visibility on an account can draw added scrutiny during the review.
The March 30, 2026 change reaches categories with very different purposes. They include people seeking a fiancé visa to join a partner in the United States, religious workers applying under the R-1 classification, trainees under H-3, and applicants in T and U categories tied to trafficking and crime victims.
It also extends to dependents in several groups. K-2, K-3 and R-2 are among the categories now covered, along with H-4 dependents who were brought into the program in an earlier expansion.
The timeline shows a steady widening of the policy over less than a year. In June 2025, the State Department initially expanded social media vetting to F, M and J visa applicants.
That first phase covered students and exchange visitors. Six months later, in December 2025, the department added H-1B workers and H-4 dependents.
The latest step on March 30, 2026 pushed the program into 14 additional visa categories. By size and scope, it is the broadest expansion yet.
The categories added this week span family-based, employment-related, diplomatic, cultural exchange and humanitarian classifications. K-1, K-2 and K-3 cover fiancé(e) visas and dependents, while R-1 and R-2 cover religious workers and dependents.
H-3 applies to trainees. A-3 and C-3 cover diplomatic and domestic workers, and G-5 applies to international organization employees’ dependents.
Q covers cultural exchange participants. S covers special immigrant witnesses, while T and U cover trafficking and crime victims.
The expansion means the screening framework is no longer limited to the student, exchange visitor and specialty worker groups that formed the earlier rounds. It now reaches applicants whose cases can involve family reunification, religious service, job training, diplomatic households, cultural programs and victim-based protections.
For applicants in those categories, the rules center on disclosure and visibility. They must report all social media usernames or handles used in the past five years, and they must make accounts public for the review.
That combination makes the policy more than a simple form question. It requires applicants to open their social media presence to consular examination and to ensure that the material is visible enough for officers to review.
Limited visibility itself can become part of the assessment. The instruction that such limits “could be construed as an effort to evade or hide certain activity” places applicants in a position where privacy settings may affect how an officer interprets the record.
The State Department has tied that scrutiny to inadmissibility screening. It says the purpose is to identify people who may be barred from entry because they threaten national security or public safety.
The department’s review also targets expressions of hostility toward U.S. citizens, institutions, or founding principles. It includes support for designated terrorist organizations and antisemitic harassment or violence.
Those standards now apply across a wider field of applicants than before. A person applying for a fiancé visa, for example, now enters the same social media screening system already used for an H-1B worker or an F visa applicant.
The same is true for a religious worker seeking an R-1 visa. Religious worker applicants and their dependents now fall inside a vetting process that examines online identities and asks for five years of social media handles.
Because the requirement attaches to the DS-160, it becomes part of the ordinary visa application process rather than a separate screening track. Applicants who leave out social media information risk more than an immediate refusal.
The State Department says omission could lead to visa denial and future ineligibility. That makes accuracy in disclosure central to the application itself.
The sequence of expansions also shows how the department has built the program category by category. First came F, M and J in June 2025, then H-1B and H-4 in December 2025, and now a far larger March 30, 2026 addition that reaches 14 more categories.
Taken together, those phases cover students, exchange visitors, specialty workers, dependents, fiancé(e)s, religious workers, trainees, diplomatic and domestic workers, cultural exchange participants, special immigrant witnesses, and applicants in trafficking- and crime-related visa categories. The reach is now much wider than when the June 2025 phase began.
The newest groups also include applicants whose circumstances can already be sensitive. T and U visas involve trafficking and crime victims, while S visas cover special immigrant witnesses.
K categories can involve couples preparing to marry in the United States. R visas apply to religious workers and their dependents.
Even with those different circumstances, the department has imposed the same core screening demands. Applicants must list five years of usernames or handles, make accounts public, and accept that consular officers may weigh low visibility or incomplete disclosure in deciding whether to issue a visa.
The policy places social media behavior and account access alongside more traditional parts of visa adjudication. Online activity now sits inside the same screening structure as other information that officers review when determining whether an applicant is admissible.
March 30, 2026 therefore stands as a turning point in the scale of the program. By extending social media screening to a fiancé visa, a religious worker application, and a dozen other categories in a single step, the State Department has made online disclosure a requirement for a much larger share of people seeking U.S. visas.
For applicants preparing forms now, the warning is direct: social media accounts must be disclosed, visibility must be set to “public,” and omissions can carry consequences that reach beyond one application to future eligibility as well.