Key Takeaways
• Many asylum seekers earn up to £500 weekly illegally delivering food using rented accounts and modified e-bikes.
• Smuggling debts force migrants into illegal gig work, with profits often funding criminal networks and traffickers.
• Allowing work after six months could save the UK £280 million annually and reduce exploitation, but opposition remains.
Asylum seekers in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 are at the center of a growing debate as reports claim that many are earning money illegally through food delivery services. These developments have led to heated discussions about work rights, the impact on the UK 🇬🇧 economy, and ongoing enforcement challenges. Here, we break down the facts, the people involved, and what it means for the wider community, using simple, clear language to help everyone understand the issue.
Illegal Jobs in the Gig Economy
Recent findings show that a significant number of asylum seekers who are waiting for their claims to be processed are working illegally in the delivery industry. This includes popular services like Deliveroo, Just Eat, and Uber Eats. Reports indicate that some can make up to £500 each week, even though they do not have the right to work. Many of these individuals live in Home Office hotels, where the government houses people while their asylum claims are checked.
Instead of working directly through these companies, some asylum seekers rent accounts from others who are allowed to work. This arrangement allows them to sign up, receive job offers, and get paid, all while staying under the radar. Renting an account can cost between £70 and £100 a week. In addition to this, many use modified electric bikes, which help them to deliver food quickly and avoid being noticed.
This pattern points to a loophole in the system. The gig economy, which relies on people working flexible jobs, has made it possible for those without the right documents to find work. While this offers short-term gains for the workers and food delivery platforms, it creates problems for both the government and the job market as a whole.
Debt and Human Trafficking Connections
Many migrants do not choose this illegal work simply to make a living. A big part of the money they earn goes to repay debts to smugglers who helped them cross into the UK 🇬🇧. For some, these debts can easily reach over £1,000. One trafficker in Dunkirk, France 🇫🇷, reportedly charges £1,370 to help someone cross the Channel. These traffickers advertise the ease of finding jobs as food couriers in the UK 🇬🇧, using messages like “it’s easy money and you can pay us back quickly” to encourage migrants to make the risky journey.
Most of the time, the money made from illegal work is not kept by the asylum seeker, but sent back to smuggling gangs. This means the profits from the gig economy are, in part, helping to fund criminal networks, making the issue even more complex.
Why Is Illegal Work So Common?
British law says that most asylum seekers are not allowed to work while waiting for their cases to be decided. These wait times can be long, sometimes taking years to resolve. Because they cannot work legally, many turn to illegal jobs out of necessity. The government gives support, such as housing (often in Home Office hotels) and small weekly payments, but this is rarely enough to cover basic needs, let alone added debts from smuggling.
Campaigners who believe the current rules are too strict say that allowing people to work after waiting six months would help both migrants and the UK 🇬🇧 itself. For them, the issue is not just about economic gain, but about offering a sense of purpose and reducing the risk of pushing vulnerable people into crime. They point to two main reasons for changing the work ban:
– Public Finances: If half of long-waiting asylum seekers could work, tax payments and lower support costs could save the UK 🇬🇧 up to £280 million a year.
– Exploitation: Without legal work, migrants are often forced to take dangerous or illegal jobs. Allowing them to work legally would mean fewer people are at risk from gangs and fewer illegal jobs on the market.
As reported by VisaVerge.com, these arguments have been supported by data from Refugee Action, which shows that a change in policy could help everyone, including the public budget.
Opposition and Government Concerns
Not everyone agrees that giving more work rights to asylum seekers is the answer. Some politicians and members of the public worry that if the rules were made looser, it would act as a “pull factor”—in other words, it might encourage even more people to make the journey to the UK 🇬🇧. They argue that making it easier to find work could send the wrong message, making the UK 🇬🇧 more attractive to both genuine refugees and those looking for economic opportunities.
These concerns are seriously debated in Parliament. Some MPs fear that giving asylum seekers the right to work could lead to tougher competition for jobs, especially in areas where people already struggle to find stable employment. They also worry that such changes would make it easier for smuggling gangs to sell their services, knowing that “easy jobs” await those making the crossing.
Another argument is that, if the system is opened up, it would create confusion for employers and regulators, making it harder to keep track of who has the legal right to work in the UK 🇬🇧.
Problems with Enforcement
The UK 🇬🇧 Home Office is responsible for checking that employers, including those in the gig economy, only hire people with the correct documents. However, keeping track of who is working for platforms like Deliveroo and Uber Eats is difficult. Unlike traditional jobs, workers in the gig economy often use apps and deliver food using their own vehicles. This makes it easy for people to avoid checks.
In 2023, Home Office checks found that four in ten delivery drivers did not have the right paperwork. This shows just how difficult it is to stop illegal work. New laws and crackdowns are being rolled out, and special police units have started to target businesses and workers acting outside the law. Still, the fact that so many drivers are working without permission suggests that these measures may not be enough.
For many migrants, the threat of being caught is not enough to stop them. Since the risk of immediate deportation is low and the need for money is high, many feel they have little choice but to keep working, even if it is illegal.
Living in Home Office Hotels
Many asylum seekers are placed in temporary accommodation, known as Home Office hotels, while they wait for their cases to be decided. These hotels are often crowded, and migrants can spend months or even years living in limbo. Because they cannot legally work and get only limited financial support, this often leads to boredom, frustration, and financial stress.
The promise of illegal work in the gig economy becomes a tempting way to ease these pressures. Some migrants share contacts and tips about how to rent accounts, use fake identity documents, or find loopholes in the system. This informal network within Home Office hotels can make it easier for newcomers to join the illegal workforce.
At the same time, these hotels are costly for the government to run. Any policy changes that reduce the time people spend in these hotels—or help them support themselves—could save taxpayers a lot of money. Critics, however, believe that making life easier for asylum seekers might undermine the tough message they want to send about illegal migration.
The Human Side
Behind all the statistics and arguments are real people. Many asylum seekers left dangerous situations, hoping to find safety in the UK 🇬🇧. For them, working—even illegally—can mean sending money back to families in need, trying to repay dangerous debts, or simply taking back a sense of control in lives often shaped by waiting and uncertainty.
On the other hand, people living and working in local communities may worry that illegal work undercuts wages, makes jobs more scarce, and puts unfair pressure on services. Delivery companies themselves also face tough choices. While they need drivers to meet high demand, they risk fines if they turn a blind eye to workers without the right documents.
Possible Policy Solutions
There is no simple answer to the problem. Some options being considered include:
– Allowing Work: Let asylum seekers work after a set waiting period, such as six months. This could reduce illegal jobs and help people support themselves.
– Faster Case Processing: By speeding up how quickly claims are decided, fewer people would be left in limbo for years.
– Stronger Checks: Improve technology and enforcement to spot fake accounts, track app use, and penalize those who break the law.
– Support for At-Risk Migrants: Offer debt support or advice to those most at risk from gangs and loan sharks.
None of these options will fix the system overnight. Each one comes with its own costs, risks, and debates. What is clear is that the current system creates real challenges—not just for asylum seekers, but also for government budgets, job markets, and even public safety.
Impacts for Key Groups
- Asylum seekers: Face long waits and little to live on, making illegal work in the gig economy tempting. Many use their earnings to pay off debts from dangerous crossings or support families left behind.
- Employers and Food Delivery Platforms: Must balance high demand for workers with the risk of using illegal labor. They are under pressure from both sides: customers who want fast service and government agencies cracking down on undocumented work.
- The UK 🇬🇧 Public: Some are concerned about jobs and public spending, while others want to see fairer treatment for those fleeing danger. The debate over work rights touches on wider questions of fairness, law, and national identity.
- Existing Migrant Communities: Worry that high-profile debates about illegal work may lead to more suspicion or discrimination, even against those who are following the law.
Conclusion: What Happens Next?
The issue of illegal work among asylum seekers living in Home Office hotels is not just a matter of law or economics. It touches on how the UK 🇬🇧 sees itself: as a fair society, a rule-based country, or a land of opportunity. Policymakers face difficult choices—how to protect vulnerable people, fight crime, keep jobs fair, and spend public money wisely.
Debates in Parliament will continue, and both sides have strong arguments for and against changing the law. In the meantime, the gig economy continues to grow, and enforcement remains a big problem. For anyone interested in learning more about the facts behind asylum seekers and current UK 🇬🇧 refugee policy, detailed information is available on the Refugee Council’s official site.
Staying informed is important as the country decides if and how it will change these rules. What happens next will impact not just those waiting in Home Office hotels, but workers, communities, and the economy for years to come.
Learn Today
Asylum Seeker → A person requesting international protection due to fear of persecution, awaiting decision on their refugee status.
Gig Economy → A labor market with short-term, flexible jobs, often managed through digital platforms like food delivery apps.
Home Office Hotels → Accommodations funded by the UK government for asylum seekers waiting for their claims to be processed.
Account Renting → Illegally using another person’s work platform account for employment, often in food delivery services.
Human Trafficking → The illegal movement of people, often for forced labor or exploitation, frequently involving smuggling networks.
This Article in a Nutshell
UK asylum seekers face long delays and limited support, pushing many into illegal gig economy jobs like food delivery. Smuggling debts and lack of legal work options drive this trend. Policy changes, such as granting work rights after six months, could ease strain and reduce exploitation, sparking national debate.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• Asylum seekers linked to rise in homelessness in United States
• REAL ID is not a national ID card, says Department of Homeland Security
• REAL ID deadline delayed to 2025, says Department of Homeland Security
• Romania removed from US Visa Waiver Program by Homeland Security
• ICE agents raid Oklahoma City home of US citizen family by mistake
