- A new wage-weighted selection system replaces the random H-1B lottery, favoring higher salary levels.
- Beneficiaries with Level IV offers receive four lottery entries compared to one for Level I.
- Employers face a $100,000 supplemental fee for overseas hires and intensified wage level scrutiny.
Employers filing H-1B cases in 2026 face a different system than the one they knew a year ago. The old random lottery has been replaced by wage-weighted selection, and the change rewards higher salaries with better odds while putting Level 1 filings under sharper scrutiny. At the same time, Prevailing wage rules, public access file duties, and a new $100,000 supplemental fee are raising the cost and complexity of sponsorship.
The change matters most for companies that depend on skilled foreign workers, especially technology firms, healthcare employers, startups, and manufacturers. It also affects workers whose job offers sit at different wage levels, because compensation now shapes both selection odds and compliance risk.
Wage-Weighted Selection Replaces the Random H-1B Lottery
The most important shift took effect on February 27, 2026. USCIS replaced the random H-1B lottery with a wage-weighted selection system for the FY 2027 H-1B cap season, whose registration window ran from March 4 to March 19, 2026.[1][3]
Under this system, each beneficiary receives entries tied to the wage level of the offered job:
- Level IV: 4 entries
- Level III: 3 entries
- Level II: 2 entries
- Level I: 1 entry[3]
That gives a Level IV offer four times the selection odds of a Level I offer. The wage level comes from the Department of Labor’s Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS) data, which assigns prevailing wages by SOC code and worksite location.[3] The key question is not the worker’s background alone. It is whether the offered wage meets the OEWS level for that job and place.
Registration, LCA, and Petition Must Match Exactly
Employers now need to treat the wage level as a filing decision, not a rough estimate. At registration, the employer must identify the wage level tied to the offered salary.[1] If the beneficiary is selected, the later H-1B petition must support that level with documentation.[1]
The same wage level, SOC code, and worksite area must appear across the registration, the Labor Condition Application, and the petition.[3] USCIS may deny or revoke a case if it sees wage inflation, a later wage drop, or a mismatch in location or job duties.[1]
That rule matters because employers cannot boost odds by listing one location at registration and another later. When more than one worksite is involved, USCIS looks at the lowest applicable wage level among the listed places.[3] If multiple employers file for the same beneficiary, the beneficiary is entered using the lowest wage level among those registrations.[1]
Level 1 Filings Face Close Review
The new system has intensified attention on Level 1 classifications. USCIS has already been scrutinizing low-wage H-1B cases more closely, and in 2026 that review has become one of the most common triggers for Requests for Evidence.[7]
Officers are checking whether the wage level fits the duties listed in the petition. A title alone is not enough. The job description, required education, experience, and supervision level must align with the selected wage level.[7] Recent policy discussions have also stressed a preference for higher-skilled and higher-paid positions.
That puts entry-level sponsorship at a disadvantage. A Level I beneficiary has one entry, while a Level IV beneficiary has four. Employers that rely on junior hires now face both weaker lottery odds and more compliance questions. The result is a filing environment that pushes sponsors toward higher pay and more detailed job descriptions.
According to analysis by VisaVerge.com, this shift is already changing how employers price jobs and structure H-1B filings. Employers that once treated wage choice as a paperwork step now use it as a central part of talent planning.
Prevailing Wage Levels Shape the Offer
The Department of Labor uses four wage levels:
- Level 1 – Entry Level: routine work under close supervision
- Level 2 – Qualified with Experience: moderately complex tasks with general supervision
- Level 3 – Experienced: complex tasks performed independently
- Level 4 – Highly Skilled: the most complex assignments, often with leadership duties[7]
The prevailing wage varies by occupation and geography. That is why the same salary can land in different levels in different cities. A software engineer earning $120,000 may be Level II in San Francisco but Level III or IV in Austin.[15]
Employers must pay the higher of the prevailing wage or the actual wage paid to similar U.S. workers.[9] That rule remains central even as selection odds now reward higher compensation. The program no longer treats all salaries equally.
The New Cost Burden on Employers
The selection shift is only part of the cost. A $100,000 supplemental fee applies to most overseas hires, effective September 21, 2025.[15] The fee is still tied to ongoing litigation, but it already reshapes budget planning for companies that sponsor abroad-based workers.
When that fee is combined with prevailing wage requirements and compliance documentation, H-1B sponsorship becomes far more expensive. For many employers, especially smaller ones, the choice is no longer only about finding talent. It is also about whether the full cost fits the hiring plan.
Public Access Files Are No Longer a Back-Office Detail
Every employer that files an LCA for H-1B, H-1B1, or E-3 workers must create and maintain a Public Access File (PAF).[2][6] The file is mandatory. It is not optional, and it is not replaced by attorney records or payroll files.[2]
The PAF should be created very early, ideally within one working day after filing the LCA with the Department of Labor.[2][6] Employers must keep it available for public inspection at the principal place of business or the worker’s worksite.[2]
Each PAF must include:
- the certified Labor Condition Application (`Form ETA 9035/9035E`)
- wage rate documentation and how the wage was set
- proof of the prevailing wage source
- notice records showing posting or electronic notice
- a benefits summary for U.S. workers and the H-1B worker[2][6]
PAFs must exclude personal records such as passports, visas, Social Security numbers, I-94s, home addresses, and Form I-129 materials.[6] Employers should keep files organized so they can be produced quickly during a public request or a Department of Labor review.
For official guidance on wage rules and compliance duties, employers can review the Department of Labor’s Foreign Labor Certification resources at the official DOL wage and labor certification page. The agency’s pages are the most direct public reference for LCA and prevailing wage questions.
Future Wage Rules May Rise Again
The Department of Labor has also proposed a rule that would revise wage rules for the H-1B and PERM programs.[5] The proposal has cleared the Office of Management and Budget and is expected to move to the Federal Register for public comment.[5]
That process matters because it could raise wage minimums again. In early 2026, the department was expected to post a notice of proposed rulemaking to increase the pay employers must offer to H-1B workers.[11] Employers watching only the lottery are missing half the picture. The wage floor itself may move upward.
Which Employers Feel the Pressure First
Technology and engineering firms remain the biggest H-1B users, and they face pressure to offer higher salaries to improve odds. Healthcare employers may benefit more often from higher wage levels, though smaller providers still feel the cost jump. Startups and small businesses face the toughest path, because many cannot sustain Level III or Level IV pay. Manufacturing employers and other margin-sensitive industries may also scale back sponsorship or shift hiring plans.
The H-1B program in 2026 now rewards high wages, strict document control, and clean filing records. Employers that match salary, job duties, location, and paperwork in every filing are positioned to stay in the program. Those that treat wage levels casually face lower odds, more RFEs, and a harder road to approval.
I have zero complaints about foreign workers getting paid higher wages based upon their education and experience; however, as an American Citizen, even after obtaining a Bachelor of Science from an accredited institution and two certificates of completions from non-accredited institutions, I have zero protections on the amount of wages I receive. Businesses can choose to pay me minimum wage, or in the case of businesses such as LiveOps, DoorDash and Uber, these businesses get away with having a person do the work for free. Yes, it’s work when there is required training to perform the job which LiceOps chooses not to pay their contractors. For drivers making deliveries, the trip to the restaurant or to pickup a person is work, for which these companies choose not to pay the contractor. There needs to be consequences for companies who believe that writing a one-sided contract forcing people to work for free.