- USCIS and DHS launched a policy to bypass asylum interviews for certain applicants, moving cases directly to court.
- The rule targets a massive one point four million case backlog to speed up immigration enforcement and adjudications.
- Referrals without interviews affect late filings or individuals with serious criminal convictions or security concerns.
The Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services announced Affirmative Asylum Referrals Without Interview on July 27, allowing officials to send some asylum applications directly to immigration court without a USCIS interview.
The interim final rule took effect on July 28, 2026. It applies to Nigerians and other foreign nationals seeking asylum affirmatively, meaning they are not already in deportation proceedings.
Free toolUSCIS Receipt Number Decoder
USCIS can now refer certain applications to the Executive Office for Immigration Review based only on the written record. The agency said the change will help reduce a backlog that reached 1.43 million pending cases by mid-2026.
Applicants could reach a judge sooner. They may also lose an opportunity to explain their claims verbally before entering the formal court process.
USCIS Director Joseph Edlow said the asylum system had been used for delay and work authorization rather than protection in some cases.
“For far too long the asylum system has been exploited for purposes of delay and work authorization, not legitimate claims of protection. America’s asylum system exists to protect individuals who genuinely fear persecution and this rule will help ensure that resources are directed to the timely adjudication of those claims instead of to those seeking to use the system as a loophole.”
Edlow said the rule should direct agency resources toward claims that warrant protection. The Department of Homeland Security described the backlog as the main reason for the faster process.
Written records can now trigger a direct referral
Under the previous affirmative process, most applicants received a non-adversarial interview with a USCIS asylum officer. If the officer declined to grant asylum, USCIS referred the case to an Immigration Judge.
The new policy removes the interview requirement for cases that appear barred or ineligible on their face. USCIS can instead forward the application directly to the Executive Office for Immigration Review.
The written application now carries more weight at the first stage. Applicants file their claims through Form I-589, which must set out the basis for protection and the relevant facts supporting the request.
The rule does not require USCIS to skip every interview. It gives the agency authority to bypass that step in covered cases.
Late filings and serious convictions are among the listed cases
The policy identifies several categories that are most likely to receive a referral without an interview:
- Applications filed more than one year after the applicant’s last arrival in the United States.
- Applicants with “particularly serious” criminal convictions.
- Cases in which an asylum officer determines that the applicant poses a threat to public safety or national security.
Those categories concern eligibility barriers and security or safety assessments. An applicant whose written record appears to fit one of them could move into removal proceedings before presenting the claim in a USCIS interview.
The USCIS policy manual updates, posted in July 2026, describe the asylum process and the new procedure. The agency also published the updated asylum guidance.
Nigerians may face an earlier courtroom process
Nigerians form a significant portion of African asylum seekers in the United States, according to the policy material. The change means applicants may need a more detailed written application from the outset.
A live interview previously gave applicants a chance to address inconsistencies, describe trauma, or provide context about conditions in Nigeria. A direct referral removes that preliminary opportunity in cases selected under the rule.
The next setting may come before a judge. The process is adversarial rather than the non-adversarial USCIS interview used in the earlier stage.
The government also expects the policy to reduce the time that applicants it considers to have non-meritorious claims remain in the country with pending status and work eligibility. That objective links the referral change to both case processing and employment authorization.
DHS General Counsel James Percival framed the change as part of a broader enforcement effort.
“One of the greatest barriers to effective immigration enforcement is intentional delay by illegal aliens and the open borders attorneys who represent them. My office works every day with the immigration components of DHS to improve efficiency and fulfill the [administration's] mandate.”
Percival’s statement places the policy within DHS efforts to speed enforcement. The rule itself focuses on the initial USCIS review and the route an application takes after that review.
The rule starts with the agency’s written review
USCIS announced the change with DHS on July 27, 2026. The Federal Register interim final rule identifies the policy as an immediate change to affirmative asylum referrals.
Applicants who avoid the interview stage do not receive a USCIS grant through that stage. Their cases move to the Executive Office for Immigration Review, where they face the next part of the protection and removal process.
The timing is tied to the size of the pending docket. DHS cited 1.43 million affirmative asylum cases by mid-2026, while USCIS said faster referrals would allow the agency to move cases off its docket more quickly.
The department’s July 27 announcement therefore combines two objectives: processing facially ineligible claims faster and limiting delays associated with pending asylum applications and work authorization. The new procedure took effect the following day.
