Barnaby Joyce Backs Pauline Hanson’s Call for Mass Deportations, Denies One Nation Wants White Australia Policy Return

Barnaby Joyce backs One Nation's 2026 plan to deport 75,000 visa overstayers, suggesting medical visits could trigger removals while denying racial motives.

August 2026 Visa Bulletin
36 advanced 0 retrogressed F-2A Mexico ▲568d
Key Takeaways
  • Barnaby Joyce supports One Nation’s plan for mass deportations of 75,000 visa overstayers in Australia.
  • The proposal suggests using medical appointments as triggers for the immediate removal of unlawful non-residents.
  • Joyce denies seeking a return to White Australia policies, focusing instead on cultural assimilation and compliance.

Barnaby Joyce backed Pauline Hanson’s call for mass deportations of visa overstayers on July 20, 2026, while denying that One Nation wants to restore Australia’s former White Australia policy.

Joyce, who defected to One Nation in late 2025, supported the party’s proposal to remove 75,000 people described in its policy as “illegal migrants.” The group includes visa overstayers and unlawful non-residents.

Barnaby Joyce Backs Pauline Hanson’s Call for Mass Deportations, Denies One Nation Wants White Australia Policy Return
Barnaby Joyce Backs Pauline Hanson’s Call for Mass Deportations, Denies One Nation Wants White Australia Policy Return

He said authorities should act when people without valid visas “present themselves for medical issues or other things.” Those people should then be “put on a plane and sent back,” he said.

Free toolUSCIS Receipt Number Decoder

The comments came after footage showed Hanson meeting far-right UK figures during a high-profile trip to Europe. The meetings brought the party’s removal proposal together with a separate argument about national identity.

Joyce appeared on Sunrise and other Australian media outlets as he defended the policy. One Nation has gained political influence following a surge in 2026 polling.

August 2026 Final Action Dates
India China ROW
EB-1 Oct 15, 2022 Jul 01, 2023 ▲30d Current
EB-2 Unavailable Sep 01, 2021 Current
EB-3 Jan 01, 2014 Jan 01, 2022 ▲10d Sep 01, 2024 ▲31d
F-1 Dec 15, 2018 ▲317d Dec 15, 2018 ▲317d Dec 15, 2018 ▲317d
F-2A Jul 22, 2026 ▲567d Jul 22, 2026 ▲567d Jul 22, 2026 ▲567d

“We don’t support the White Australia policy. the end of the policy was a good thing.”

Joyce said the party’s position concerned “assimilation” and “Australian culture,” rather than race. The White Australia policy operated from 1901 to 1973.

Hanson’s European meetings connected deportation demands to migration history

The debate followed Hanson’s meetings with Tommy Robinson and Rupert Lowe, the leader of Restore Britain. During those encounters, she reportedly expressed support for pamphlets advocating mass deportation.

She also reflected on the end of the White Australia policy as the beginning of Australia’s migration “problems.” Joyce’s response accepted the removal proposal but rejected the historical interpretation attached to those remarks.

One Nation’s stated target covers people who have overstayed visas and other unlawful non-residents. The proposal therefore reaches beyond a single category of visa breach.

The party’s policy describes the intended group as “illegal migrants.” Joyce’s comments gave a specific enforcement scenario: contact with authorities during medical appointments or other matters could lead to removal.

Medical contact could become a removal trigger

Human rights advocates have raised concerns that the proposal could discourage people without valid visas from seeking essential healthcare. Some fear it could create a “shadow population” that avoids medical services because contact with authorities might expose their immigration status.

The Australian Human Rights Commission issued a message in April 2026 warning that “demonising migrants” and calls to revive White Australia-era rhetoric increase the risk of community division and violence.

That warning addressed the social effects of the language surrounding migration. The proposed use of medical contact adds a practical concern, because people who need treatment could weigh care against the risk of removal.

The proposal has also drawn criticism from Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke. Australian critics have described recent One Nation and Coalition migration proposals as “Trumpian” or influenced by United States enforcement styles, including ICE-style taskforces.

U.S. pressure forms part of the wider migration debate

The Australian argument is unfolding alongside broader international pressure over migration. In late 2025, the U.S. State Department sent cables to embassies in Australia, Canada and the UK directing diplomats to lobby those governments against “mass migration.”

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the department would “urge governments to take bold action and defend citizens against the threats posed by mass migration.”

That international activity provides a wider political setting for the Australian debate, but Joyce’s proposal remains focused on people in Australia who lack valid visas. The stated target is 75,000 people, including visa overstayers and unlawful non-residents.

Joyce’s position leaves One Nation defending a large-scale removal plan while rejecting the claim that it seeks a return to the White Australia policy. The party’s proposal would apply when people without lawful status come to authorities for medical issues or other matters.

People also ask

Answers from VisaVerge guides
What are the main arguments of Pauline Hanson and Matt Canavan in their push for tighter border settings?

Hanson and Canavan argue that Labor’s decision to allow about 3,000 people from Gaza to come to Australia during the conflict could open the door to infiltration by hostile actors, and they want to err on the side of caution regarding security risks.

Read: Canavan backs Hanson's call to send Gaza asylum seekers home
What is one of the key changes in Australia's immigration policy proposed by Peter Dutton?

Dutton proposed a reduction in the permanent migrant cap from 185,000 to 140,000 and returning the refugee and humanitarian intake program to a planning level of 13,750.

Read: Peter Dutton outlines plans for lower energy costs and more homes in budget response
What are some political implications of Australia's decision to deport 'NZYQ' group members?

The decision has strong political undertones, influenced by upcoming elections, and reflects ongoing criticism from opposition parties regarding the government's handling of asylum seekers with criminal histories.

Read: Australia's Deportation of 'NZYQ' Group Sparks Human Rights Concerns
How many unlawful non-citizens does the Coalition plan to deport under the new policy?

The Coalition plans to provide additional funding for authorities to identify and deport approximately 65,000 unlawful non-citizens who have exhausted legal avenues.

Read: Coalition Unveils Australian Values Migration Plan, Angus Taylor Promises Tougher Vetting
What does the Australian opposition Coalition plan to do regarding immigration?

The Coalition plans to sharply cut migrant intake, including international student visas, aiming for around 100,000 permanent migrants annually.

Read: Coalition Says Immigration Is Still Too High, Plans Sharp Cuts
AU flag
Australia
Oceania · Canberra · Passport Rank #23
● Level 1 — Exercise Normal Precautions
What do you think? 0 reactions
Useful? 0%
Oliver Mercer

As Chief Editor at VisaVerge.com, Oliver Mercer steers the site's editorial direction with a particular focus on Canadian and Oceania immigration — from Express Entry and provincial programs to Australian and New Zealand visa routes. He curates and edits content, guides the writing team, and safeguards factual accuracy across every article. Under Oliver's leadership, VisaVerge has become a trusted source for clear, comprehensive immigration guidance.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments