- IRCC corrected a policy error regarding Reciprocal Employment Code C-20 instructions on August sixth, twenty twenty-six.
- The department removed the prior foreign employment requirement that was mistakenly added in late July.
- Officers will now focus on the employer’s global hiring pattern rather than an individual’s specific work history.
Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada corrected its July 29 Reciprocal Employment Code C20 instructions on August 6, 2026, after the earlier version said applicants had to be currently employed abroad. The change came within a week. It was a fast reset.
The July 29 wording had tightened an LMIA-exempt pathway inside the International Mobility Program. It would have turned the route into a check on prior overseas employment, not on the employer's wider reciprocity. New hires were the immediate problem. Extensions were caught in the same net.
Free toolDS-160 Form Filling Online Helper Tool
Multinational companies and academic institutions use C20 to move people between Canada and the U.S. The category helps preserve similar opportunities for Canadians abroad. That cross-border use mattered. The narrow wording reached far beyond one office note.
An IRCC official later addressed the mistake in a statement circulated to immigration stakeholders. The department said:
"The update, which appeared on the department's website on July 29, 2026. was posted in error due to a version control issue and does not reflect the intended policy."
The explanation pointed to a version control issue. The wrong draft went up.
By August 6, 2026, the corrected instructions had removed the foreign-employment requirement and returned to the earlier reading. Officers now judge the employer's broader hiring pattern, not the applicant's own work record. The updated page appears on Reciprocal employment (C20) – International Mobility Program. The legal basis remains R205(b).
The broader reciprocity test is back
| Feature | July 29, 2026 version | August 6, 2026 correction |
|---|---|---|
| C20 eligibility | Treated as narrower, tied to prior overseas employment | New hires can qualify |
| Foreign employment | Read as required | Not required |
| Officer focus | Heavy attention on the applicant's current job abroad | Attention returns to the employer's wider reciprocal hiring pattern |
| LMIA | Exempt | Exempt |
| Legal basis | R205(b) of the IRPR | R205(b) of the IRPR |
The category still sits inside the International Mobility Program, where Canada uses work permits to exchange knowledge, workplace practices and experience. The correction restores that wider logic. Reciprocity can be global. It does not depend on a single bilateral pairing.
Under the corrected reading, a company can show reciprocity by hiring a U.S. citizen for a Canada role while also employing Canadians in European offices. The test can be general and global. It is broader than one applicant's job history. That was the point the July 29 wording had obscured.
The week of scrutiny came from the legal community, and the department moved back to its earlier interpretation. For applications refused or delayed during the July 29 to Aug. 6 window, IRCC said they will now be assessed under the previous, broader guidelines. That window lasted eight days. Files from that stretch will not stay under the narrow version.
