- USCIS received nearly 17,000 U visa petitions in the first half of fiscal year 2026.
- Preliminary benefits fell sharply, with 8,785 petitioners approved and 5,330 qualifying relatives covered.
- The principal-case backlog topped 461,000 cases, and new filings may wait at least 20 years.
Nearly 17,000 U visa petitions arrived during the first six months of fiscal year 2026, while slower preliminary decisions narrowed access to protections for applicants and their qualifying relatives.
USCIS statistics released September 16, 2026, show that the agency approved preliminary benefits for 8,785 petitioners and 5,330 qualifying family members during the same period. The total was described as more than 70 percent lower than the prior year.
Free toolI-94 Expiration Calculator Online
The slowdown affects benefits that can arrive before a final decision. Applicants may receive deferred action and work authorization while they wait.
Demand continues to exceed the program’s annual capacity. Federal law limits principal U-1 visas to 10,000 each fiscal year.
About 11,000 derivative petitions were also filed during the first six months of FY 2026. Those filings add pressure around family members whose protection depends on the principal petitioner’s case.
A September 16 analysis said the filing volume and slower processing are unfolding against a much larger queue. It described the program as created for noncitizen victims of certain crimes who assist law enforcement.
Slower preliminary decisions postpone work authorization
Bona fide determination processing slowed during the first half of 2026. That preliminary review can connect eligible petitioners and family members to deferred action and employment authorization before final adjudication.
The delay therefore reaches beyond the principal applicant. A qualifying relative may also wait longer for the protections tied to the underlying petition.
The agency approved benefits for 8,785 petitioners and 5,330 family members in the period covered by the figures. The reported decline from the prior year shows fewer people receiving that early protection even as new requests continued to arrive.
The program’s final visa limit remains separate from the preliminary benefits process. Applicants can move through early protection procedures while still facing a much longer wait for a visa number.
The filing line is growing faster than annual availability
| Measure | Figure | Period or limit |
|---|---|---|
| Principal petitions filed | Nearly 17,000 | First six months of FY 2026 |
| Derivative petitions filed | About 11,000 | First six months of FY 2026 |
| Principal U-1 visas available | 10,000 | Each fiscal year |
| Additional family-member approvals | 16,000-18,000 | Each year |
| Principal-case backlog | More than 461,000 | As of March 2026 |
The backlog had exceeded 461,000 principal cases by March 2026. At the pace described in the analysis, the newest pending cases could take at least 20 years to reach adjudication.
That estimate concerns the final queue, not every stage of interim protection. The analysis said early benefits continue to reach many applicants, but the slower preliminary processing has reduced access for others.
Receipt dates control the wait for final decisions
USCIS uses receipt-date cutoffs to manage the line for final approvals under the annual cap. Applicants therefore continue to wait in filing order as available principal visas are allocated.
Family members face a related constraint. The research identifies an additional 16,000-18,000 annual approvals for family members of petitioners, but those approvals do not remove the 10,000-visa limit for principal applicants.
The cap has not changed in the figures reviewed here. High filing volume continues to outpace annual principal-visa availability.
Critics and supporters split over interim protection
Andrew R. Arthur of the Center for Immigration Studies said the program remains oversubscribed “for decades to come” without action by Congress or the states.
Critics argue that interim protections give large numbers of applicants benefits long before officials complete merits review. Supporters describe those protections as necessary safeguards for crime victims facing years of delay.
The competing views focus on the same procedural gap: applicants may need protection while the final visa queue remains far longer than the annual supply.
