Income Tax Department Probes 60 Top Restaurants in Nagpur for Tax Evasion

Nagpur tax authorities reopen assessments for 60+ restaurants after AI analysis reveals widespread sales suppression and billing data manipulation in 2026.

Key Takeaways
  • Over sixty Nagpur restaurants face reopened tax assessments following a massive investigation into reported income gaps.
  • Authorities used AI to compare billing platform data against official income tax and GST filings.
  • Allegations include bulk deletion of bills and routing digital payments to personal bank accounts.

More than 60 prominent restaurants and food outlets in Nagpur face reopened tax assessments after investigators found alleged gaps between their reported income and transaction records, according to a July 13, 2026 report. The Income Tax Department is examining claims that businesses suppressed sales and under-reported turnover. Notices have gone to the identified establishments.

The cases emerged from an analysis of restaurant billing and payment data. Officials compared records from PetPooja, a restaurant billing platform, with income-tax returns and GST filings. Significant differences prompted the Investigation Wing to forward its findings to officers responsible for reopening completed assessments.

Income Tax Department Probes 60 Top Restaurants in Nagpur for Tax Evasion
Income Tax Department Probes 60 Top Restaurants in Nagpur for Tax Evasion

The department has not published the full list of outlets. The cases center on alleged tax evasion through deleted bills and payments routed outside business accounts.

Free toolSubstantial Presence Test Calculator

A Central Board of Direct Taxes press release dated March 9, 2026, described the national exercise this way:

"During the exercise, it was found that several restaurants were engaged in deletion of bulk bills and other modifications to suppress the actual sales."

The local review follows a nationwide data operation that examined 60 terabytes of transaction information from approximately 1.77 lakh restaurants. Officials used artificial-intelligence analytical tools to compare the data with tax filings.

Deleted bills and private UPI accounts form the core allegations

Investigators are examining whether restaurants used PetPooja functions to remove entire blocks of cash-sale records before filing returns. The material reviewed by officials indicates that some businesses could delete as much as 30 days of billing data.

The inquiry also identified a separate payment pattern. Some outlets allegedly directed UPI payments to the personal bank accounts of relatives or associates instead of their registered business accounts.

PetPooja founders and directors Parthiv Patel and Apurv Patel are named in the investigation’s background. The software, founded in 2011, allegedly contained a concealed function that allowed users to edit or delete billing records in bulk.

The investigation began with a routine check in Hyderabad in late 2024. That review involved a local biryani chain and found nearly ₹13,317 crore in allegedly suppressed sales through invoice deletion.

National data points to a wider restaurant review

The wider exercise produced several figures cited by tax authorities and government officials:

MeasureFigure or date
Restaurants whose data underwent analysisApproximately 1.77 lakh, or 177,000
Transaction data analyzed60 terabytes
Restaurants surveyed on March 8, 202662 across 46 cities
Preliminary sales suppression from that survey₹408 crore
Estimated concealed turnover since the 2019–20 financial year₹70,000 crore
Restaurants identified for SAKSHAM NUDGE outreach63,000

The March 8 survey found preliminary sales suppression of ₹408 crore across 62 restaurants in 46 cities. Officials estimated that restaurants had concealed ₹70,000 crore in turnover nationwide since the 2019–20 financial year.

The agency also used the SAKSHAM NUDGE campaign, short for “Non-Intrusive Usage of Data to Guide and Enable,” to ask 63,000 restaurants to voluntarily update their returns. The voluntary-compliance deadline was March 31, 2026.

Voluntary corrections preceded the Nagpur assessments

Pankaj Chaudhary, Minister of State in the Ministry of Finance, told the Rajya Sabha that SAKSHAM NUDGE campaigns had produced more than ₹7,000 crore in revenue impact through voluntary updates.

The campaign’s approach initially emphasized voluntary compliance. Officials later signaled that businesses ignoring the advisories could face stricter legal action.

Deepak Prakash, a Rajya Sabha member, raised questions about scrutiny of returns and delays in refunds connected with the NUDGE campaigns. Those questions added parliamentary attention to the department’s use of data-led outreach.

The current cases represent the next stage: completed assessments may be reopened where billing records, bank transactions, returns and GST filings do not align. The July 13 findings were forwarded to Nagpur’s cadre controlling officers for action involving the 60-plus restaurants.

Officials are shifting from notices to enforcement

The investigation’s methods reflect a broader move toward automated comparisons rather than relying only on physical inspections. Billing software records, digital payments and tax filings can expose differences across several reporting systems.

Simran Shrivastava’s July 13 account documented the local findings and the officials’ explanation of the PetPooja comparisons. The review remains focused on establishments where the discrepancies were large enough to justify reopening assessments.

The restaurant sector is also facing pressure from a crackdown on mandatory service charges and higher commercial LPG costs. Those pressures form part of a wider reckoning for India’s food and beverage businesses in 2026, but the assessments will turn on each outlet’s records.

The March 31 voluntary-update deadline has passed. The next step for the identified businesses is the reassessment process, as officers examine whether deleted bills, redirected UPI receipts or other differences changed the income reported to tax authorities.

People also ask

Answers from VisaVerge guides
What was the outcome of the GST Department's inspections on immigration firms?

The UT Administration revealed that significant findings from these efforts will have serious consequences for compliance standards in the immigration sector.

Read: GST Raids Chandigarh Immigration Firms for Tax Evasion
How does the Income Tax Department track taxpayers' data to ensure compliance?

The Income Tax Department tracks data from banks, mutual funds, property registrars, employers, TDS returns, GST systems, and foreign asset disclosures.

Read: Legal Tax Savings Require Real Transactions and Evidence as Income-Tax Department Tightens
What happens if an income-tax department flags purchases as bogus but accepts some sales in a dispute?

If accepted sales are proven, the entire purchase amount may not be treated as taxable income, with courts often taxing only the profit element or benefit arising from the disputed purchases.

Read: Assessing Officer Flags Bogus Purchases, but Accepted Sales Can Limit Tax Additions
What types of financial data can tax officials access under the new Income Tax Bill (No.2), 2025?

Tax officials can analyze transfers, invoices, wallet balances, trading records, or messages that directly confirm payments or assets, but they are not meant to comb through unrelated personal chats, photos, or family conversations.

Read: CBDT clarifies: tax officials will analyse only financial data
What changes are coming to NRI tax scrutiny under the new Income Tax Bill?

The new Income Tax Bill, 2025 introduces stricter residency and reporting requirements, closing DTAA loopholes, and increasing scrutiny for large transactions and mismatches in filings.

Read: NRIs may still face tax scrutiny under new Income Tax Bill
What do you think? 0 reactions
Useful? 0%
Nadia Hassan

Nadia Hassan covers immigration policy and legislation for VisaVerge.com, decoding the bills, executive actions, agency rule changes, and fee structures that reshape the system. With a sharp eye for how Washington's decisions reach ordinary applicants, she translates dense policy into practical context. Nadia's analysis gives readers the "what it means for you" behind every major immigration announcement.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments