What Pending I-485 Applicants Must Check Before Submitting Form I-131 for Advance Parole

New BIA ruling warns that Advance Parole travel now triggers inadmissibility bars for those with unlawful presence history; USCIS fees and filing rules updated.

Key Takeaways
  • A new BIA ruling treats advance parole departures as triggers for three- and ten-year inadmissibility bars.
  • Applicants with over one hundred eighty days of unlawful presence face significant risks when traveling abroad.
  • Filing fees have changed, now requiring separate payments of six hundred thirty dollars for most new adjustment applicants.

Pending I-485 applicants should review their unlawful-presence history before filing Form I-131 or leaving the United States with Advance Parole. A new Board of Immigration Appeals ruling says that departure can trigger the three- and 10-year inadmissibility bars.

The decision came August 13, 2026. In Matter of Delcarmen-Lara, 29 I&N Dec. 830 (BIA 2026), the BIA overruled 14 years of precedent under Matter of Arrabally and Yerrabelly.

What Pending I-485 Applicants Must Check Before Submitting Form I-131 for Advance Parole
What Pending I-485 Applicants Must Check Before Submitting Form I-131 for Advance Parole

The ruling treats departure under a grant of advance parole as a departure for section 212(a)(9)(B)(i) of the INA. Applicants who accrued more than 180 days of unlawful presence could face a bar to returning and may be unable to obtain permanent residence through the pending case.

Free toolSubstantial Presence Test Calculator

USCIS added a warning to its travel-document page August 14. The agency wrote:

"As of Aug. 13, 2026, departing the United States after obtaining an Advance Parole Document is a departure for purposes of inadmissibility. Aliens considering a departure with an Advance Parole Document should be aware that they may be inadmissible. if they have accrued more than 180 days of unlawful presence."

Before submitting the application, applicants should determine whether they have ever accumulated more than 180 days of unlawful presence. The new rule concerns travel after approval, too. An already-issued document does not remove the need to assess that history before departure.

The filing fee now depends on when the adjustment case began

USCIS eliminated the former bundled-fee structure for most applicants. People whose adjustment applications were filed on or after April 1, 2024, generally must pay a separate travel-document fee.

The current amount is $630 for a paper filing or $580 online. Applicants can check the agency’s fee schedule before submitting payment.

A separate immigration parole fee may also apply. DHS established a $1,000 charge effective October 16, 2025, under Pub. L. 119-21, known as “HR-1.” The charge may be collected at the port of entry or when the request receives approval.

USCIS said August 14 that it is currently “pausing the collection” of some HR-1 fees for specified class members in Ms. L. v. ICE. General applicants should account for the possible fee while reviewing the filing cost.

Payment rules changed as well. Beginning October 28, 2025, USCIS stopped accepting paper checks or money orders for many paper submissions. Applicants must use Form G-1450 for credit-card payments or Form G-1650 for ACH debit.

A work permit card may not authorize a return trip

USCIS has largely moved away from issuing combination cards. Most applicants now receive a plastic employment authorization document and a separate paper travel document, Form I-512L.

The card may say “NOT VALID FOR REENTRY.” That wording is not a substitute for the paper document. Leaving with only the employment card, without the paper Form I-512L, will result in automatic abandonment of the pending adjustment application.

Applicants should therefore verify the document in hand before traveling. Approval of employment authorization alone does not establish that the person has the required travel document.

Initial evidence must carry the case without an RFE

A USCIS Policy Alert issued August 5, 2026, says officers may deny cases without first sending a Request for Evidence or a Notice of Intent to Deny when the initial submission is incomplete or lacks “clear and convincing” proof of eligibility.

That standard affects requests based on humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit. Applicants in those categories should include supporting third-party records with the first submission, including medical records and death certificates when those documents support the request.

The filing should also use the 01/20/25 edition, or a later edition, of the travel-document form. Using an outdated edition can create a separate filing problem.

Five checks should come before filing or departure

The following points bring the current requirements together:

CheckWhat the applicant should verify
Unlawful presenceWhether the applicant has accumulated more than 180 days before traveling under the new BIA rule
Travel documentWhether the applicant has the paper Form I-512L, rather than only an employment card carrying a reentry disclaimer
Immigration statusWhether valid H-1B or L-1 status remains available, since people maintaining those statuses may not need advance parole
Filing chargeWhether the adjustment application began on or after April 1, 2024, requiring a separate travel-document fee
Form editionWhether the submission uses the 01/20/25 edition or a later version

H-1B and L-1 workers still must maintain status eligibility if they rely on that route instead of seeking travel permission. A pending adjustment case does not eliminate that requirement.

The BIA decision and USCIS warning make the unlawful-presence review the most consequential step. Applicants with a complicated entry, departure, or status history should resolve that issue before booking travel or relying on an approved document.

USCIS maintains the travel-document filing page, while the Department of Justice publishes the Delcarmen-Lara decision.

People also ask

Answers from VisaVerge guides
What are some risks associated with traveling on Advance Parole while processing I-485?

Traveling without Advance Parole or before its approval can lead to the abandonment of your I-485 application, and unexpected delays in returning due to personal circumstances or political climate changes may disrupt your presence.

Read: Understanding the Risks of Travel with Advance Parole During I-485 Processing
Who needs Advance Parole for travel in 2025?

People with pending Form I-485 applications, DACA recipients, TPS holders, asylum applicants, and some others who do not yet have permanent resident status need Advance Parole to travel outside the United States while their immigration application is pending.

Read: 7 Essential Facts About Traveling on Advance Parole in 2025
What are the consequences of traveling without Advance Parole for someone with a pending I-485 application?

Traveling outside the U.S. without Advance Parole can lead to your I-485 application being abandoned by USCIS, difficulties or impossibility in re-entering the U.S., and potential negative impacts on future immigration applications.

Read: Traveling outside the U.S. without Advance Parole: consequences for pending I-485
What are the risks of traveling without Advance Parole for a pending I-485 application?

Travelers with a pending Form I-485 should not depart until they hold valid Advance Parole obtained by filing Form I-131, as leaving during a pending case can count as abandoning that application.

Read: Top 5 Thanksgiving Travel Mistakes Immigrants Make and How to Avoid
What should applicants do before traveling on Emergency Advance Parole with a pending regular Advance Parole application?

Applicants should notify USCIS of their travel and consult an immigration attorney to safeguard their cases.

Read: Traveling on Emergency Advance Parole May Risk Abandonment of Pending Regular Application
What do you think? 0 reactions
Useful? 0%
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Robert Pyne

Robert Pyne is a Professional Writer at VisaVerge.com specializing in USCIS processes — case status, receipt notices, forms, documentation, and step-by-step application guidance. His detailed, methodical explainers demystify the paperwork and procedures that trip up applicants at every stage. Robert's work gives readers the confidence to handle their immigration filings accurately and on time.