Key Takeaways
• Minnesota federal prosecutors charged 32 illegal reentry cases in 2025, a sharp increase from prior years.
• Five counties joined ICE’s 287g program, deepening local-federal cooperation on immigration enforcement.
• Sanctuary jurisdictions face legal threats and potential loss of federal funding for resisting immigration collaboration.
Federal prosecutors in Minnesota have stepped up their efforts on immigration cases, following a strong push from President Trump’s administration to tighten immigration rules across the country. This change marks a big move from what people saw in recent years, bringing Minnesota in line with broader, nationwide goals for stronger border control and enforcement.
Sharp Rise in Immigration Cases
So far in 2025, federal prosecutors in Minnesota have charged 32 cases of illegal reentry — this means people who came back to the United States 🇺🇸 after being told to leave. This number is much higher compared to the past eight years, showing just how much the focus on immigration law has changed in the state.
This isn’t just happening in one state. Across the country, federal prosecutors filed more than 990 immigration cases in just one week. For a sense of scale, the Southern District of Texas 🇺🇸 alone handled 237 of those cases during that period. These numbers support what Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove outlined in a memo in January 2025. In this document, Bove told federal prosecutors to “take all steps necessary to protect the public and secure the American border by removing illegal aliens from the country and prosecuting illegal aliens for crimes” inside U.S. borders.
The increase in Minnesota immigration cases fits into this larger trend nationwide, where President Trump’s policies continue to shape how and where federal prosecutors focus their efforts. It’s clear that Minnesota is now much more involved in enforcing federal immigration laws than it has been for a long time.
Local Law Enforcement Joins Federal Efforts
A major part of this new approach is the teamwork between local sheriffs and federal immigration agencies. Five Minnesota sheriff’s offices have made new agreements with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement — often called ICE. These partnerships fall under the “287g program,” which allows local police to help enforce federal immigration laws. Here’s what’s happening in those counties:
- The sheriffs in Cass, Crow Wing, and Itasca Counties have agreed to be part of a task force with ICE.
- Freeborn County has chosen to use what’s called the “warrant service officer” model, where certain officers can serve ICE warrants.
- Jackson County has decided on both the “warrant service officer” and “jail enforcement” models, which means more chances for local officers to work closely with ICE.
At the same time, three counties — Freeborn, Kandiyohi, and Sherburne — continue their ongoing contracts with ICE to hold people with immigration issues in their local jails. This shows how local law enforcement agencies in Minnesota are becoming more involved in supporting federal immigration prosecutors as they tackle more immigration cases.
You can read more about these agreements and how they work by visiting the official ICE 287g program page.
Pushback from Sanctuary Areas
Even as some law enforcement agencies join with federal prosecutors, other parts of Minnesota are taking a very different approach when it comes to immigration cases. Some cities and counties have what are called “sanctuary” policies. These are special rules that limit how much local police and officials can work with federal immigration authorities or help them with immigration cases.
Minneapolis, for instance, has chosen to keep a distance from federal immigration efforts. Its police chief, Brian O’Hara, says that city officers aren’t allowed to ask people about their immigration status unless it’s part of a bigger investigation, like a case involving human trafficking. The city also supports a Sanctuary City Task Force that focuses on helping local immigrant communities and making sure deportations are fair.
Minnesota’s Attorney General, Keith Ellison, has also voiced strong concerns about President Trump’s immigration policies. Ellison points out, “There’s nothing in American law that requires local officials to cooperate with federal law enforcement officials.” Because of this, Ellison joined other state attorneys general to take legal action against certain Trump policies, saying they violate the U.S. Constitution.
This pushback from cities like Minneapolis and officials like Ellison is important. It highlights a big divide in Minnesota — where some places are helping federal prosecutors with more immigration cases, while others are fighting to protect their immigrant communities.
Federal Response: More Pressure on Local Governments
President Trump’s administration isn’t backing down when it comes to making sure all states and local governments help with federal immigration enforcement. The Justice Department has told federal prosecutors, including those in Minnesota, to investigate when state and local officials “obstruct or impede federal functions” tied to immigration. The January 2025 memo from Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove clearly states: “Federal law prohibits state and local actors from resisting, obstructing, and otherwise failing to comply with lawful immigration-related commands and requests.”
This instruction could potentially put local officials who don’t help federal agents at risk of legal trouble. It raises the stakes for cities and counties that have decided to act as sanctuary jurisdictions or have policies that limit cooperation with immigration authorities.
To add even more pressure, the administration is threatening to withhold federal funding from places that refuse to help with immigration cases and law enforcement. This could put hundreds of millions of dollars in federal grants at risk for Minnesota’s cities and counties. Such a financial threat can cause serious worry for local leaders, who depend on federal funds for things like schools, health care, and public safety.
Ongoing Tensions and Legal Challenges
These changes have turned Minnesota into a sort of battleground over federal immigration policies. According to University of Minnesota political science professor Larry Jacobs, it has become “a sustained partisan battle between Washington and Minnesota.” Some local officials want to follow President Trump’s orders, while others feel the state and its cities should make their own choices about immigration.
The legal battles aren’t just happening in courtrooms. They also play out in day-to-day policing, the way county jails are run, and in the lives of thousands of immigrants who call Minnesota home. Federal prosecutors find themselves in the middle, with pressure from Washington to act, and local resistance making their job harder.
For federal prosecutors in Minnesota, this situation means an even closer look at how they handle immigration cases. Each decision — to charge, to seek jail time, to cooperate with a local sheriff, or to push back against a “sanctuary” city — can have lasting effects on real people and the relationship between federal and local government.
What the Numbers Show
The spike in illegal reentry cases gives a clear sign of how policy has changed. Before 2025, these numbers were much lower, suggesting that immigration enforcement was not as much of a focus for federal prosecutors in Minnesota. With the new approach, these cases have become a top priority.
Across the country, the weekly number of new immigration prosecution filings (over 990 in a single week) supports the idea that this is a national, not just a local, trend. The leadership of President Trump and the Justice Department has driven these changes, with specific instructions to federal prosecutors like those in Minnesota to increase immigration actions.
Competing Views on What Works Best
Supporters of the increased enforcement say it’s a needed step to protect the country’s borders and keep people safe. They argue that putting more resources behind immigration cases will deter illegal reentry and discourage people from breaking immigration laws.
On the other hand, critics — including local mayors, police chiefs, and attorneys general — often say that these strict policies create fear in immigrant communities, make it harder for people to trust the police, and may lead to unfair treatment. Sanctuary cities argue that their approach helps keep everyone safer because witnesses and victims feel more comfortable calling police, even if they’re worried about their immigration status.
Analysis from VisaVerge.com suggests that this back-and-forth between the federal government and Minnesota’s local officials is unlikely to stop anytime soon. As long as both sides believe they’re doing the right thing — whether it’s enforcing the law or protecting rights — the arguments and legal fights will probably keep going.
How This Affects Minnesota Families and Communities
For families in Minnesota — especially those with mixed immigration status — these changes in enforcement can bring a lot of worry. Even people with legal status may be confused about what the new rules mean, what happens if they interact with the police, and what rights they have.
Employers in Minnesota might also see the effects. Some fear that stricter immigration enforcement could lead to worker shortages, especially in industries that depend on migrant labor such as agriculture and food processing.
Schools and local services may feel the impact if federal funding is cut because of resistance to Trump administration immigration policies. These are real concerns for people who count on government help in their everyday lives.
Looking Forward: What Comes Next?
It’s clear that federal prosecutors in Minnesota will stay focused on immigration cases as long as the Justice Department keeps up its strong enforcement strategy. The number of prosecutions may rise even further if local law enforcement agencies continue to work closely with federal officials.
At the same time, battles over “sanctuary” laws and local resistance will likely continue, both in court and in how day-to-day law enforcement is carried out. Local leaders may keep challenging federal policies they see as unfair, and the Justice Department may keep looking for ways to make all jurisdictions comply.
Anyone living in Minnesota, especially those affected by immigration cases, should closely follow updates from trusted sources and official government sites. For general information about immigration law and forms, it’s helpful to check the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services website for up-to-date resources.
Key Points
- Federal prosecutors in Minnesota are filing many more immigration cases, especially illegal reentry charges, since President Trump set stricter immigration rules.
- Cooperation between certain county sheriffs and federal immigration agencies has grown, while other parts of Minnesota, like Minneapolis, maintain sanctuary policies and resist federal efforts.
- The Justice Department is warning local officials that blocking or refusing to help with immigration enforcement could have legal consequences.
- Threats to cut federal funding from non-cooperative areas put extra pressure on local governments and could affect basic services.
- The situation in Minnesota is part of a wider national debate about the best way to handle immigration enforcement while respecting individual rights.
For the latest news and detailed guidance on Minnesota immigration cases and other legal updates, continue to watch for reliable information from sources such as government pages and VisaVerge.com.
Learn Today
Illegal Reentry → Returning to the United States after being deported or removed, which is a federal crime under immigration law.
ICE → U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a federal agency responsible for enforcing immigration policies and apprehending undocumented individuals.
287g Program → A program allowing local law enforcement to partner with ICE and help enforce federal immigration laws in their communities.
Sanctuary Jurisdiction → A city or county limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities, often to protect undocumented immigrants from deportation.
Warrant Service Officer → A local officer authorized to serve federal immigration warrants as part of cooperation agreements with ICE.
This Article in a Nutshell
Immigration enforcement in Minnesota is intensifying under Trump’s renewed policies. Federal prosecutions, especially for illegal reentry, are surging, reflecting national priorities. Local sheriffs increasingly cooperate with ICE, while sanctuary jurisdictions push back, risking funding. This evolving landscape affects immigrants, families, and communities throughout the state, with ongoing legal and social consequences.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• University of Minnesota student wins deportation case against ICE
• Detentions and deportations rise in Minnesota under Trump’s new term
• Dogukan Gunaydin’s deportation hearing delayed in Minnesota
• Doğukan Günaydın of University of Minnesota faces immigration court
• 5 Students in Minnesota Deported Citing DUI and Past offenses
