Key Takeaways
• California faces a $12 billion budget deficit driven by unexpectedly high immigrant health care costs.
• Governor Newsom proposes freezing Medi-Cal enrollments and adding a $100 monthly premium for undocumented immigrants.
• Other states like New York and Minnesota also confront rapidly rising costs from immigrant health and social services.
California is facing major financial challenges as the state government, under Governor Gavin Newsom, works to close a $12 billion budget deficit. A large part of this shortfall comes from higher costs tied to health care for immigrants living in California without legal status. As these budget pressures mount, the state is rethinking how much support it can give. Other places, like New York City and some states around the U.S., are dealing with similar problems because of spending on new arrivals and undocumented immigrants.
To put these issues in clear perspective, let’s look at why California’s budget deficit is causing so much concern, what the proposed solutions might mean for immigrants, and how the debate is playing out in other states like New York and New Jersey.

California’s Budget Deficit and Immigrant Health Care Spending
Governor Gavin Newsom recently explained just how serious the situation is. The state now faces a $12 billion deficit. Why has this happened? It comes down to a few key problems:
– Medicaid costs for immigrants in California have ended up much higher than state officials expected from the start.
– There is wider economic uncertainty. Factors like federal tariffs and rapid changes in the stock market have disrupted revenue streams.
– California spends close to $8.5 billion each year from the general fund to cover health care for immigrants who live in the state without proper legal status.
But the costs keep going up. The money spent to cover people with “unsatisfactory immigration status” (basically, those who do not have legal documents) has increased to about $10.8 billion per year now. Only a few months ago, officials thought this number would be about $6.4 billion. Those projections have missed the mark by a wide margin.
For the state, this sudden jump in spending during a time of overall budget trouble has created a tough situation. Gavin Newsom and his team now have to make hard decisions about what the state can pay for and what might need to be cut in the coming years, especially when it comes to care for immigrants.
Proposed Cuts to Immigrant Services
To respond to the budget deficit, Governor Gavin Newsom’s administration is putting forward a set of proposals aimed mainly at reducing the state’s spending on health care for immigrants. These proposals are part of what’s known as the “May Revision” budget.
Here are the main ideas being considered:
– Freeze on new enrollment: Starting January 2026, the state would stop allowing any new undocumented immigrants to sign up for Medi-Cal, the state’s main health care program for low-income people.
– Monthly premium: Undocumented immigrants would have to pay a $100 monthly fee to keep their Medi-Cal coverage.
– Service cuts: The state would stop offering long-term care benefits and dental benefits. In-Home Supportive Services—a program paying caregivers to help disabled and older people at home—would also be eliminated for those without legal status.
– Health center funding: Spending on health centers and clinics, which often serve immigrant communities, would go down.
The Newsom administration says these steps would save California about $5.4 billion by the 2028-29 fiscal year. At the same time, the governor is putting forward a $194.5 billion Medi-Cal budget for 2025-26, showing just how large the state’s health care system is.
Political Debate Surfaces
Newsom’s proposals have triggered heated debate inside California politics. Some Republicans blame Governor Gavin Newsom’s leadership for the problems. Assembly Republican Leader James Gallagher stated, “Newsom’s finger-pointing on the budget shortfall is the biggest load of crap I’ve ever seen from a politician, and he shovels out a lot of it. We’re in this mess because of his reckless spending, false promises, and failed leadership.”
Assembly member Joe Patterson, also a Republican, added: “It’s laughable that he’s trying to blame Trump for anything. He overpromised to them, and he’s pulling the carpet out from underneath them.”
These statements reflect a larger debate about who is responsible for California’s budget woes—including the costs tied to services for immigrants and how to balance these needs with other priorities.
A Problem Shared by Other States
California is not alone in its struggle. Other parts of the United States 🇺🇸 are also facing increased costs as they expand health and social services to cover immigrants. Here are a few examples that illustrate what’s happening elsewhere:
– In Minnesota 🇺🇸, officials projected that 5,700 residents without legal status would sign up for the state-run Medicaid program at a cost of $200 million. Now, both the number of people signing up and the costs have tripled.
– Illinois 🇺🇸 is ending services for most adult immigrants, except for seniors, starting July 1. The reason given is the higher-than-expected enrollment and the increased price tag that comes with it.
These cases show that the challenge of paying for immigrant health benefits goes far beyond California.
New York City’s Large Migrant Spending
Of all the U.S. cities, New York City faces a very large—and growing—bill as more new arrivals come seeking protection and help. The city estimates it will spend $10.9 billion in total for asylum seekers across 2024 and 2025. The city itself will pay $8.9 billion of that amount.
Broken down, the city expects to need another $6.5 billion in new funding over just two years—$2.3 billion in 2024 and $4.1 billion in 2025. Looking ahead, spending is set to remain high, with $4.4 billion projected for new arrivals in 2025 and $4.0 billion in 2026.
To help, the New York State 2023-2024 Enacted State Budget provided $1 billion to the city for new arrivals, using a reimbursement model. This approach means New York City must spend the money first and then apply for funding back from the state. Even with state help, the city bears the largest share of costs.
How New Jersey’s Budget Stands Apart
Compared to California and New York, New Jersey 🇺🇸 has taken a different approach so far. The budget for the 2025 fiscal year, introduced by Governor Murphy, does not focus as much on immigrant-specific costs. Instead, it looks at broader “fiscal priorities,” including:
– Continuing investments in property tax relief for residents
– Funding education and expanding economic possibilities
For the 2025 budget year, New Jersey recommends spending $55.9 billion, with expected revenues of $54.1 billion. These numbers show the state is also dealing with tough choices but, at least publicly, is not facing as much pressure from the rising costs tied to immigrants as California and New York are.
What Do These Changes Mean for Immigrants and the State?
For immigrants living in California without legal status, the changes proposed by Governor Gavin Newsom would have real and likely harsh effects:
– Losing Access to Health Care: Freezing new Medi-Cal enrollments and imposing monthly fees would mean many immigrants could lose access to basic, preventive, or emergency health care. Health centers and clinics that serve these communities would also lose funding, making care harder to find even for those who remain eligible.
– No Long-Term Care or In-Home Support: Many elderly or disabled immigrants rely on in-home services to live independently. Losing these services could force some into emergency rooms or more expensive care settings, driving up costs elsewhere.
– Dental Care Cuts: Dental health is important for overall health. Ending dental care will likely cause more untreated problems in these communities over time.
For California as a whole, these proposals could mean lower state spending, helping close the current budget deficit. On the other hand, advocates warn that taking away health services could backfire by pushing immigrants into emergency care settings, which can end up being even costlier for the state in the long run.
Broader Context and Background
In recent years, California has led the way on offering social and health benefits to immigrants who live in the state without legal permission. These moves have been praised by some for promoting public health and helping families, while others see them as a major strain on the budget—especially during times when the economy is shaky.
This situation is not new. Whenever states face budget deficits—like the one now hitting California—the costs and benefits of offering support to immigrants always come under the spotlight.
Analysis from VisaVerge.com suggests that more states may soon find themselves in similar situations, as the numbers of new arrivals across the U.S. continue to grow. States that have welcomed large numbers of immigrants over the past few years are likely to face rising costs for health care and social services, which could strain their own budgets.
Different Perspectives and Ongoing Debate
The debate over the right level of support for immigrants is far from settled. Supporters of more generous benefits argue that public health benefits everyone, and that immigrants—many of whom pay taxes and hold jobs—should be able to see a doctor or get care when they need it.
Those on the other side see these programs as adding too much to the state’s financial problems. They say programs for immigrants, especially when not tied to legal status, are unfair to taxpayers, especially during times of deficit.
This same argument plays out at every level of government, from city halls and state houses to national debates about federal support for sanctuary cities and states.
What’s Next for California and Other States?
California’s decisions in the next months will have a major impact on hundreds of thousands of people who rely on Medi-Cal and other programs. Lawmakers in Sacramento will have to decide which parts of Governor Gavin Newsom’s proposed cuts to accept, change, or reject. These choices will not only affect immigrants but could also change how California prioritizes its spending in the future.
Other states will be watching closely. If California’s cuts lead to lower costs and no big problems, officials in other states might feel stronger about making similar changes. But if health and community problems get worse or costs show up elsewhere, states may look for different answers.
For readers interested in the technical details and the official rules around these health care programs, more information can be found on the California Department of Health Care Services – Medi-Cal program. This site explains who can apply, what benefits are covered, and how new rules could affect services moving forward.
Key Points to Remember
- California’s budget deficit is now $12 billion, driven by both economic forces and much higher-than-expected costs for health care for immigrants.
- Governor Gavin Newsom proposes a freeze on new signups for Medi-Cal by immigrants without legal status, fee increases for those who remain, and cuts in many health programs.
- Other states like Minnesota and Illinois are also running into higher costs than planners expected when expanding care to immigrants, sometimes forcing cutbacks.
- New York City is spending close to $11 billion on new arrivals across 2024 and 2025, projecting even more in coming years.
- New Jersey remains focused on broad fiscal priorities and has not reported major problems with costs tied directly to immigrants.
- The debate over spending on immigrant services is growing more intense as budget gaps widen, and decisions in the next few months will affect policy well beyond California.
As the debate grows, the eyes of the country are on California, the nation’s most populous and diverse state. How the state deals with its budget deficit under Governor Gavin Newsom could set the tone for how other states, and perhaps the entire nation, handle the hard choices between welcoming newcomers and balancing the books.
Learn Today
Medi-Cal → California’s state-funded health insurance program for low-income residents—including undocumented immigrants, pending policy changes and restrictions.
May Revision → The updated version of California’s annual proposed state budget, released each May to adjust for economic changes.
General Fund → The main pool of discretionary funds California uses for operating the state and funding programs like Medi-Cal.
In-Home Supportive Services → A government program paying caregivers to assist elderly or disabled people with daily activities at home.
Asylum Seekers → Individuals who request international protection but whose claims for refugee status have not yet been determined.
This Article in a Nutshell
California’s $12 billion deficit is reshaping immigrant health benefits. Governor Newsom targets Medi-Cal, proposing to freeze new enrollments and add monthly premiums for undocumented immigrants. Other states, including New York, grapple with similar cost surges. These decisions may influence how the U.S. balances immigration spending and fiscal responsibility.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• 2025 Budget Reconciliation may cut health coverage for immigrant families
• JFK Workers Score Big Win in New York State Budget
• Portland Cinco de Mayo Fiesta drops naturalization ceremony over budget cuts
• Coalition’s net migration cuts questioned over Australian budget impact
• Peter Dutton outlines plans for lower energy costs and more homes in budget response