Key Takeaways
• House Bill 318 expands immigration status checks to all felonies and more misdemeanor crimes in North Carolina.
• Senate Bill 153 requires state agencies and UNC schools to formally cooperate with ICE and check immigration status.
• Critics argue the laws increase fear, risk racial profiling, and may violate constitutional rights, sparking strong debate.
North Carolina 🇺🇸 is at the center of a new debate over immigration enforcement. State lawmakers are pushing for even stricter rules, building on a law that took effect in December 2024. These changes have ignited strong opinions on both sides and could shape how the state handles immigration in the years ahead.
Background: The 2024 Immigration Law and House Bill 10
In December 2024, North Carolina 🇺🇸 rolled out House Bill 10, which changed how sheriffs and jails across the state work with federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Under this law, sheriffs now have to check the immigration status of people accused of certain serious crimes. If someone is accused of violent felonies, specific misdemeanors, or domestic violence, jail staff must try to find out their legal residency status. On top of that, if ICE sends a detainer (a written request asking a jail to hold someone) and an administrative warrant, sheriffs have to keep the person for up to 48 hours.
These rules were not easy to pass. After years of debate, House Bill 10 became law because Republicans won enough seats in the General Assembly to override the veto of Governor Roy Cooper, a Democrat. Governor Cooper had blocked similar bills in the past, including in 2019 and 2022.
According to a report by VisaVerge.com, this law signaled North Carolina’s 🇺🇸 intent to be more involved with federal immigration enforcement, especially when it comes to violent crime and public safety. The law targets specific crimes and requires sheriffs to work closely with ICE, even if their own county wants a different approach.
The Push for Stricter Immigration Enforcement in 2025
Despite these new requirements, many Republicans in North Carolina 🇺🇸 say House Bill 10 does not go far enough. They argue that some sheriffs do not comply fully with the law’s purpose. House Speaker Destin Hall pointed out that at least five sheriffs across the state are, in his words, “certainly violating the spirit” behind House Bill 10.
As a result, lawmakers have introduced more bills to further tighten immigration enforcement. Two bills are shaping the debate in 2025: House Bill 318 and Senate Bill 153.
House Bill 318: Expanding the List of Crimes
House Bill 318 was approved by the North Carolina 🇺🇸 House of Representatives on April 30, 2025, by a 70-45 vote. It is designed to strengthen the existing law by broadening which crimes lead to immigration checks.
If House Bill 318 becomes law, the following changes will take place:
- Immigration status checks will not be limited to violent felonies and domestic violence but will cover all felonies.
- The law would add crimes like impaired driving, fraud, embezzlement, forgery, and theft to the list that requires immigration checks.
- Jail officials will be required to contact ICE when a detainee has a pending detainer, and they must tell ICE when that person might be released.
- Supporters say these moves close what they call “perceived loopholes” in House Bill 10.
House Speaker Destin Hall said the changes are a response to concerns that the current law is not being enforced equally across all counties. He believes making the rules more clear and wide-reaching will make it harder for any sheriff to avoid working with federal immigration officials.
Senate Bill 153: The Border Protection Act
Senate Bill 153, known as the North Carolina Border Protection Act, was passed in the Senate in March 2025 and is now in the House. This bill takes a wider approach, focusing not just on jails but also on other parts of state government.
If approved, Senate Bill 153 would require the following:
- Several state agencies would have to enter into formal partnerships with ICE, making it official that they will work together.
- These state agencies must check the immigration status of everyone in their custody.
- The state will conduct reviews (audits) of public benefit programs to make sure people without legal immigration status do not get benefits.
- University of North Carolina (UNC) schools would not be allowed to have campus policies that make it harder for ICE to do their job.
Bill supporters such as State Senator Phil Berger say these measures are needed because of rising concerns about violent crime and possible misuse of state-paid services. They feel these tighter rules will help keep communities safe and ensure that taxpayers’ money is used only for eligible residents.
Supporters’ Perspective: Why Tighten Immigration Enforcement?
Many Republican lawmakers believe that stronger state-level immigration enforcement is critical for public safety and managing state resources. They give several reasons for pushing these bills:
- They believe the risk of violent crime is too high, and stricter laws can stop criminals from staying in the country.
- There is worry that people without legal status might misuse public benefit programs, even though they are already excluded by law.
- House Speaker Destin Hall and other lawmakers argue that some county sheriffs are not doing enough to cooperate with ICE, and these new rules would make the system more consistent across the state.
- Supporters also say North Carolina 🇺🇸 needs to act because of uncertainty over national border policy and questions about whether the federal government will continue its current approach.
State Rep. Carson Smith even pointed to the federal Laken Riley Act to show that state efforts line up with federal policies on removing people convicted of certain crimes.
Critics Raise Concerns
On the other hand, Democratic lawmakers, health experts, and advocacy groups such as the ACLU of North Carolina 🇺🇸 have raised many objections to these new enforcement bills. Their concerns include:
- They say the laws are divisive and may be motivated by politics, especially in an election year.
- Some argue the bills could be against the United States 🇺🇸 Constitution, making them open to legal challenges.
- State Senator Graig Meyer pointed out that the new rules would create extra costs for state agencies, even though people without legal status are already not allowed to use state services.
- Groups like the ACLU of North Carolina 🇺🇸 stress that stricter laws will increase fear and uncertainty among immigrant families, even if they have done nothing wrong.
- Health experts warn that increased fear and anxiety can lead to worse health outcomes for immigrants and their families.
- Others fear the risk of racial profiling, where people may be targeted based on how they look or sound, and the possibility that families could be split up over minor offenses.
These concerns add to the wider debate about what is the right balance between public safety and protecting civil rights. Some lawmakers say the bills unfairly target entire communities and could have negative effects far beyond what the sponsors intend.
Wider Context: North Carolina in a National Debate
North Carolina’s 🇺🇸 efforts are part of a pattern seen in several states across the United States 🇺🇸. As immigration remains a hot topic at the national level, many states are passing their own rules to work more closely with federal agencies or to set their own approach, especially when they feel federal action is slow or uncertain.
Recent years have seen many states try to take a firmer stance on immigration enforcement, sometimes leading to lawsuits or clashes between local and federal governments. North Carolina’s 🇺🇸 situation is similar to other states where state lawmakers want a bigger role in deciding how to cooperate with ICE and enforce immigration law.
Impact on Immigrants and Their Families
These fast-moving changes leave many immigrants in North Carolina 🇺🇸 feeling uncertain about the future. For those in mixed-status families — where some members are U.S. citizens and others are not — the fear of being separated from loved ones has grown. Even people who have not broken any laws may worry about interactions with law enforcement, uncertain if a simple traffic stop could lead to more serious problems.
Health care providers and advocacy groups see these fears spill over into mental health issues. People might avoid seeking medical help or public health services out of fear that any encounter with government agencies could put them or a family member in danger.
Meanwhile, those who support the laws argue that these fears are overstated and say that only people accused of serious crimes are likely to be affected. But critics point out that expanding the list of offenses — for example, adding all felonies or even impaired driving — means more people could end up in the system, even for mistakes that are not violent.
Impact on Local Law Enforcement
The push for more state involvement in immigration enforcement creates new pressures for sheriffs and jail staff across North Carolina 🇺🇸. Some counties may have to hire more staff, train current officers, or spend more on facilities to hold people when ICE sends a detainer. These changes could strain county budgets, especially in smaller or rural areas.
Some local leaders worry that this focus on immigration could distract from other important areas of law enforcement. Others say building trust in immigrant communities is harder when families fear reporting crimes or working with police because of possible consequences for someone’s immigration status.
University Campuses and the Impact on Students
Senate Bill 153’s rules about the University of North Carolina (UNC) system have also caused concern. Many UNC schools have programs or guidelines aimed at helping students from immigrant backgrounds feel safe on campus. The new bill would not allow these protections if they make it harder for ICE to do their job. Critics argue this could discourage students from reporting harassment or violence or using support resources.
Looking Ahead: What’s Next for North Carolina?
Both House Bill 318 and Senate Bill 153 are still moving through the North Carolina 🇺🇸 legislature. If passed, they could bring even stricter requirements for state and local government involvement in immigration enforcement. The bills could also be challenged in court if critics believe they violate rights or go against federal law.
As North Carolina 🇺🇸 continues to debate these measures, the conversation reflects wider questions about immigration policy throughout the United States 🇺🇸. Supporters believe more enforcement will make communities safer, while opponents worry about fairness, family separation, and the possibility of targeting people who have not committed serious crimes.
For now, immigrants, their families, and local officials across North Carolina 🇺🇸 wait to see how the laws will change and what effect those changes will have in daily life. The debate over House Bill 10, House Bill 318, and the North Carolina Border Protection Act is likely to shape state policy — and the lives of thousands — for years to come.
If you want to read the official text of House Bill 10 and learn more about North Carolina’s 🇺🇸 immigration enforcement laws, you can visit the North Carolina General Assembly’s official website, which provides up-to-date information on legislation, bill history, and committee actions. For more facts and updates, reputable immigration news sources like VisaVerge.com also offer regular coverage and analysis.
In summary, North Carolina’s 🇺🇸 new and proposed laws spotlight the challenges and choices states face as they deal with immigration issues. As lawmakers weigh security, fairness, and the well-being of communities, every decision will have long-lasting effects for residents across the state.
Learn Today
ICE → Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a federal agency responsible for enforcing immigration laws and detaining/removing non-citizens.
Detainer → A request from ICE asking local law enforcement to hold an individual for up to 48 hours for immigration review.
Felony → A serious crime, such as violent offenses or embezzlement, often subject to stricter legal consequences than misdemeanors.
Administrative Warrant → A document from ICE requesting authorities to detain a person for immigration reasons, not signed by a judge.
Sanctuary Policy → Local or state policy limiting cooperation with federal immigration enforcement to protect immigrants from deportation.
This Article in a Nutshell
North Carolina lawmakers are considering tougher immigration enforcement. House Bill 318 broadens crimes prompting status checks; Senate Bill 153 mandates state-ICE partnerships. Supporters cite public safety, while critics warn about civil rights and family separation. The outcome could transform North Carolina’s approach to immigration, impacting thousands for years to come.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• How Australia’s points-based immigration system selects skilled migrants
• DOJ challenges New York Sanctuary Law over immigration enforcement
• AI transforms Immigration and Customs Enforcement tactics under Trump
• Judge allows AAUP case over Trump Administration immigration rules to proceed
• White House losing public confidence on immigration policy
