Key Takeaways
• In March 2025, the Trump administration cut legal funding for 26,000 unaccompanied migrant children in immigration courts.
• Federal judges issued emergency orders in April 2025 requiring continued funding for children’s legal representation temporarily.
• Congress is considering the Fair Day in Court for Kids Act to guarantee attorneys for all unaccompanied children in immigration proceedings.
Children Sitting Before Federal Judge: Scene Highlights Larger Crisis
In a small courtroom on May 7, 2025, a Federal Judge spoke softly to a scared child, telling him, “Don’t be scared… The government cannot remove you until I tell them they can.” This event gives a clear window into a growing crisis in the United States 🇺🇸 immigration courts, where unaccompanied children must face complicated legal battles with little help and few protections. These children, some barely able to speak, are finding themselves thrust into rooms where the rules are not made for them—and where the stakes could not be higher.
Loss of Legal Help and Its Roots
This crisis did not happen overnight. In March 2025, the administration under President Trump ended a key program that paid for lawyers to protect some of the country’s most vulnerable children. This single change wiped away access to legal help for about 26,000 unaccompanied children. These children are called “unaccompanied” because they cross borders alone, without parents or legal guardians, often in search of safety or family.
Without this program, the scene in many immigration courts changed immediately. Now, children as young as one year old must try to understand rules no adult would choose to face alone. They do so without a lawyer by their side, making it almost impossible for them to explain why they should be allowed to stay in the United States 🇺🇸 or even to know how to answer an immigration judge’s questions.
Statistically, legal service providers noted that in Arizona alone, there have already been cases where a one-year-old and a three-year-old have been forced into court without anyone to speak for them. These cases are not rare—they are becoming the new normal.
Emergency Action in the Courts
After the administration terminated the legal services program, the calls for action were swift. Advocates, lawyers, and community leaders raised alarms about what would happen if children were left to stand before Federal Judges on their own. On April 1, 2025, these worries made their way to Northern California, where a federal judge listened and reacted.
This Federal Judge granted an emergency ruling, called a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO), to force the government to keep funding some of the legal help children need. Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín explained that stopping the money for legal services “without any plan to ensure continuity in representation, potentially violates Congress’ express directive” found in a law called the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA).
The TVPRA is supposed to protect children from abuse, exploitation, and harm. It also directs the government to pay for legal representation when possible. Judge Martínez-Olguín made it clear that cutting funding without a backup plan goes against what Congress intended and what the law demands.
On April 30, 2025, another Federal Judge in California extended this order. This move means that, for now, the government must continue paying for legal help for unaccompanied children in immigration courts—as long as money is available. Congress created strict rules that say these funds must be used as long as they have not run out.
Real-World Effects on Children
In practice, the effects of these changes are being felt across the country each day in many courtrooms. One child, Nicolas, missed his chance to appear in court because he was transferred to a new placement, and there was nobody there to track his case or explain his rights. Nicolas was at risk of getting a deportation order simply because he could not be in the right place at the right time. He was lucky—an attorney volunteered their time as an unpaid “friend of the court” and helped him avoid deportation.
Other children have not been so fortunate. According to reports, many minors now face fast-tracked court hearings. These speed-ups mean children and their supporters have even less time to prepare or find legal counsel. Without guidance, these children might say something by mistake or fail to say what’s needed to stay safely in the United States 🇺🇸.
Laura St. John, who leads the Florence Immigrant & Refugee Rights Project’s legal work, captured the seriousness of the problem: “It is impossible for any child—never mind babies—to have a fair day in court without an attorney.”
Why Having a Lawyer Matters
Immigration laws are not written in simple language. The courtroom is full of rules, forms, and deadlines that can confuse anyone—not just children. Without representation, children might not know how to apply for protection, explain their situation, or challenge evidence. They could easily lose their chance to stay, even if they have a valid reason for protection under U.S. law.
In many cases, having a lawyer makes all the difference. Data and expert analysis both show that unaccompanied children are much more likely to win their cases or find the help they need when they have an attorney. Without legal help, the chances drop steeply.
Legal experts are careful to point out that, under current federal law, minors are allowed to fight their cases in removal (deportation) proceedings—even if they have no help at all. There is no guarantee for legal counsel in these situations. Because of this gap, Federal Judges often find themselves in the strange role of teaching children about the law in the middle of hearings.
Congressional Moves to Protect Children
Recognizing that the law has not kept up with reality, a group of U.S. Senators has responded. On April 3, 2025, Senators Edward J. Markey and Mazie K. Hirono, together with 25 other lawmakers, introduced the Fair Day in Court for Kids Act of 2025. This bill’s purpose is clear: to make sure every unaccompanied child in these proceedings gets a lawyer.
Senator Hirono made the point simply: “Children cannot represent themselves in Court—it’s that simple.” Senator Tammy Duckworth added, “Having attorney representation can make the difference between safely remaining in the United States or being deported back to the same dangerous conditions they fled in the first place.”
This push in Congress is meant to close the dangerous gap now facing thousands of young people in the United States 🇺🇸.
The Human Face of the Crisis
The law and politics involved in this fight are complex, but behind every statistic is a human story. The children coming to immigration courts have often faced dangers in their home countries—violence, gang threats, persecution, or desperate poverty. Many are fleeing alone, hoping for a better chance at life.
Imagine being a five-year-old in a room full of adults, with no one to help, explain, or comfort you. For some, the judge is the only adult offering even the smallest bit of reassurance. But reassurance is not the same thing as having legal protection.
The main idea is that these children are dealing not just with hard-to-understand legal systems, but also with fear, separation from family, and the risk of being sent back to unsafe environments. In many cases, the stakes are nothing short of life or death.
Legal Providers Stretched Thin
The loss of funding did not just affect the children—legal service providers are struggling too. Nonprofit groups, lawyers who take these cases, and “friends of the court” are now forced to handle heavier workloads. Some have had to step forward without pay, knowing that a child’s future may rest in their hands.
With thousands of new cases and fewer resources, some lawyers can only handle the most urgent cases. Others must choose which children to help, knowing that each decision has deep consequences.
The growing backlog in immigration courts, already large before this crisis, has become worse. As reported by VisaVerge.com, delays in hearings, missing paperwork, and a lack of legal resources put even more pressure on children, legal workers, and judges alike.
Due Process and Fairness
At the center of these changes is a core question: Is it fair for small children to have their futures decided without someone who can fight for them? The United States 🇺🇸 has a long tradition of offering a fair hearing, or “due process.” With legal aid vanishing, that promise now looks less certain for many unaccompanied children.
Federal Judges are stepping in—not because it is the ideal solution, but because, in many cases, no one else will. In some hearings, judges have been recorded explaining the basics of immigration law, asking children to speak up if they are scared, and even pausing cases so children can try to find a lawyer. This is a sign of the true work being asked of the courts—and the deep need for change.
Wider Impact and Next Steps
The current challenge has immediate effects for children and their families, but it also shapes the wider debate about the immigration courts. If more children are forced to go through hearings alone, more could face deportation without a fair chance to make their cases heard. This affects not just families, but also schools, service providers, and neighborhoods across the country.
Groups working on behalf of children and immigrants continue to call for action. They want Congress to fund legal representation for every child, pointing to international standards and basic ideas of fairness found in U.S. law. Some hope that the Fair Day in Court for Kids Act will shift the situation back toward justice.
Information for those affected by or interested in these processes, including emergency legal help and steps to take before court, is available through the U.S. Department of Justice’s Executive Office for Immigration Review, which oversees the immigration courts.
Looking Forward
As things stand, the Temporary Restraining Order keeps some legal funding in place for children, but it is not a permanent fix. Advocates warn that unless Congress acts, or unless the Executive Branch steps in with new funding or rules, many unaccompanied children may once again find themselves alone in court—confused, scared, and at risk.
Every hearing, every ruling, and every story from the immigration courts is a reminder that laws are not just about paperwork—they are about people. Children appearing before a Federal Judge are not just numbers in a report; they are kids who deserve safety, a chance to be heard, and someone to stand up for them when they cannot stand up for themselves.
Summary and Call for Change
This ongoing crisis in the immigration courts shows what happens when funding is pulled and protection for unaccompanied children becomes uncertain. With Federal Judges now explaining immigration law directly to small children, the system’s limits are exposed. The future of thousands of children hangs in the balance, dependent on urgent legal reforms and continued public attention.
For families, advocacy groups, and anyone following these events, it is clear that responding to this crisis means restoring access to legal help, fighting for fairness, and making sure no child faces court alone. As Congress debates new laws and the courts struggle to keep up, the central question will remain: will the United States 🇺🇸 live up to its promise of justice and protection, even for its youngest—and most vulnerable—newcomers?
Learn Today
Unaccompanied Children → Minors entering the U.S. without a parent or legal guardian, often seeking safety or family reunification.
Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) → An emergency court order temporarily preventing an action until a more permanent decision can be made.
Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA) → A U.S. law designed to protect child victims of human trafficking and ensure legal representation.
Removal Proceedings → Legal processes in immigration court to determine whether a non-citizen should be deported from the U.S.
Fair Day in Court for Kids Act → Proposed legislation to guarantee every unaccompanied child in immigration proceedings receives a lawyer.
This Article in a Nutshell
A federal judge calming a frightened child in court symbolizes the crisis facing unaccompanied children in U.S. immigration courts. With legal aid for 26,000 children cut in 2025, many now face judges alone. Emergency judicial orders and proposed laws strive to restore fairness and justice for these vulnerable children.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• Supreme Court weighs challenge to birthright citizenship for US-born children
• U.S. citizen children deported to Honduras by New Orleans ICE office
• Office of Refugee Resettlement shifts focus from immigrant children care
• American Children Deported After Immigration Arrests on the Hi-Line
• Karnataka High Court denies visa extension for Pakistani children
