Chicago Judge Rules Salah Sarsour of Islamic Society of Milwaukee Removable Under Foreign-Policy Provision

A Chicago judge ruled that Salah Sarsour may be deported under a rarely used foreign-policy provision, while rejecting a separate green-card...

Key Takeaways
  • A Chicago immigration judge ruled Salah Sarsour may be deported on foreign-policy grounds, but did not order immediate removal.
  • His lawyers have thirty days to appeal and sixty days to seek protection based on the risk of torture.
  • The judge rejected the government’s separate claim that Sarsour misrepresented information on his green-card application.

A Chicago immigration judge ruled on September 30, 2026, that Salah Sarsour may be deported on foreign-policy grounds. The ruling does not order his immediate removal.

Judge Jayme Salinardi rejected a separate government allegation that Sarsour misrepresented information on his green-card application. The decision came from the Chicago Immigration Court.

Free toolUSCIS Receipt Number Decoder
Chicago Judge Rules Salah Sarsour of Islamic Society of Milwaukee Removable Under Foreign-Policy Provision
Chicago Judge Rules Salah Sarsour of Islamic Society of Milwaukee Removable Under Foreign-Policy Provision

Sarsour was born in Ramallah and has held lawful permanent resident status. He has lived in the United States since 1993 and leads the Islamic Society of Milwaukee, which operates Wisconsin’s largest mosque.

The decision leaves legal proceedings open. His lawyers can appeal and seek protection from removal.

Two deadlines leave room to challenge the ruling

Sarsour’s lawyers have 30 days to appeal the decision. They also have 60 days to seek relief based on the risk of torture.

An appeal would pause deportation while it remains pending. Removal cannot proceed until available legal proceedings conclude.

His lead immigration attorney, Patrick Taurel, said the defense will appeal. The case could therefore continue beyond the immigration judge’s ruling.

Rubio’s memo invoked a rarely used immigration-law ground

The government relied on a seldom-used provision of immigration law tied to foreign policy and national security. The provision dates to the Cold War era and allows removal when a noncitizen’s presence is considered harmful to U.S. foreign-policy interests.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio invoked the provision in a June 2025 memo. It said Sarsour’s presence could have “potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences” and undermine U.S. efforts to combat antisemitism.

The judge found a basis for removability under that provision, not a U.S. criminal conviction. The ruling applies to Sarsour’s case; it is not a published Board of Immigration Appeals or federal appeals court decision that establishes broader precedent.

His earlier detention brought his speech claims before a federal judge

Immigration and Customs Enforcement detained Sarsour in Milwaukee in March 2026. He was released in mid-June 2026 after a federal judge found he had raised a “substantial” claim that the administration targeted him for speaking against Israel and advocating for Palestinian rights.

Sarsour has no criminal record in the United States. Accounts of his case also describe his imprisonment in Israel in 1988, after a conviction involving the throwing of stones or a Molotov cocktail at Israeli military personnel.

That history is part of the backdrop to his removal case. His lawyers argue that sending him to the West Bank would expose him to torture by Israeli authorities.

A torture claim could still block removal

Sarsour has said a return to the West Bank “means the end of my life.” His lawyers plan to press a claim under the Convention Against Torture, seeking protection from removal based on the risk they describe.

The immigration judge has not resolved that request. The process gives the defense a separate route to challenge deportation after the ruling on removability.

DHS welcomed the decision as Sarsour promised to keep fighting

The Department of Homeland Security welcomed the ruling and said the judge “sustained multiple grounds of removability.” The department also said: “All illegal aliens receive due process,” and, “If a judge finds an illegal alien has no right to be in this country, we are going to remove them. Period.”

Sarsour called the decision “deeply disappointing.” He said, “I will continue fighting to defend the right to free speech and to stay in the country I have called home for more than three decades.”

The appeal deadline runs from the September 30 ruling. The torture-based relief application has its own 60-day filing window.

This article provides general information and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified immigration attorney about your specific case.

People also ask

Answers from VisaVerge guides
What is the basis for Mahmoud Khalil's deportation claim by ICE?

ICE claims that Mahmoud Khalil’s presence carries 'adverse foreign policy consequences' based on an assertion made by Secretary Rubio without reviewing the evidence behind it.

Read: Israelis Back Palestinian Green Card Holder Detained Amid Citizenship Interview Controversy
What are the legal and political implications of using INA 237(a)(4)(C)(i) to deport Mahmoud Khalil?

The use of INA 237(a)(4)(C)(i) against Mahmoud Khalil is rare; it has been used only 15 times out of more than 11 million immigration deportation cases, and critics argue that using it in his case raises concerns about political targeting.

Read: Mahmoud Khalil Fights Deportation in Louisiana Immigration Court
When did Judge Garcia rule on the deportation of Mohamed Sabry Soliman's family?

On July 2, 2025, Judge Orlando Garcia ruled that the deportation process for Soliman’s wife and children could move forward.

Read: Judge Rules Family of Boulder Molotov Attack Suspect Can Be Deported
When did the federal judge block Badar Khan Suri's deportation?

Federal Judge Giles blocked Dr. Suri's deportation on March 20, 2025, pending further court review.

Read: Badar Khan Suri faces deportation fight as Trump administration intervenes
How have federal judges responded to the deportation of Mahmoud Khalil?

Federal judges have blocked immediate deportation and demanded clear reasoning from Trump officials, viewing possible violations of constitutional rights seriously.

Read: Trump Officials Grilled Over Palestinian Activist Deportation
What do you think? 0 reactions
Useful? 0%
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Nadia Hassan

Nadia Hassan covers immigration policy and legislation for VisaVerge.com, decoding the bills, executive actions, agency rule changes, and fee structures that reshape the system. With a sharp eye for how Washington's decisions reach ordinary applicants, she translates dense policy into practical context. Nadia's analysis gives readers the "what it means for you" behind every major immigration announcement.