USCIS Questions H-1B Workers’ B-1/B-2 Switch After Layoff Risk

New 2026 USCIS policies and $100,000 fees have turned H-1B to B-1/B-2 'bridge' filings into high-risk strategies for laid-off tech workers.

USCIS Questions H-1B Workers’ B-1/B-2 Switch After Layoff Risk
Key Takeaways
  • USCIS archived permissive guidance for H-1B workers using B-1/B-2 bridges, increasing legal uncertainty.
  • New policies impose a $100,000 consular fee for certain H-1B petitions following employment termination.
  • Presidential Proclamation 10998 restricts travel for 39 countries, complicating visa re-entry for many nationals.

A new, more hostile environment for laid-off H-1B workers trying to bridge an employment gap with B-1/B-2 status is taking shape in the United States. What used to be a fairly common stopgap now carries sharper legal and practical risk.

For years, many laid-off H-1B holders used a B-1/B-2 bridge to stay in status while looking for a new employer. The basic idea was simple: if the H-1B job ended, the worker could file a change of status to B-1/B-2, stay lawfully for a period, attend interviews, and later move back to H-1B change of status if a new offer arrived.

USCIS Questions H-1B Workers’ B-1/B-2 Switch After Layoff Risk
USCIS Questions H-1B Workers’ B-1/B-2 Switch After Layoff Risk

That path still exists on paper. In practice, it has become much harder.

USCIS has pulled back from earlier language that many workers and lawyers relied on. Agency messaging has grown tougher. New Presidential Proclamations have added heavy costs and wider travel limits. Together, those changes make a B-1/B-2 bridge less like a safety valve and more like a bet that can fail badly.

Official policy shifts and statements

One of the biggest changes is quiet but powerful. USCIS archived its guidance page titled “Options for Nonimmigrant Workers Following Termination of Employment.” That page had stated that searching for employment and interviewing could be permissible B-1 or B-2 activity.

Once archived, that language lost much of its practical force. Adjudicators now treat it as non-controlling. workers can no longer assume an officer will follow that older guidance.

Matthew Tragesser, a USCIS spokesperson, then reinforced a stricter tone in late 2025 and early 2026. On Dec. 23, 2025, he said USCIS would “continue to demand more from both employers and aliens” as part of H-1B reform. On Jan. 16, 2026, he defended the new selection system and said the prior random process had been “exploited and abused.”

Those statements matter. They signal an enforcement posture, not just a paperwork change.

Two Presidential Proclamations added more pressure. On Sept. 19, 2025, a new $100,000 fee was imposed for certain new H-1B petitions through consular processing. Then, on Dec. 16, 2025, Proclamation 10998 expanded travel bans and partial restrictions to 39 countries, effective Jan. 1, 2026, affecting B-1/B-2 and other nonimmigrant visa issuance for many nationals.

That means a denied bridge can now trigger much higher costs and, for some workers, blocked or delayed return travel.

Policy/Policy Change Date/Effective Key Impact Source
USCIS archived “Options for Nonimmigrant Workers Following Termination of Employment” Archived before March 31, 2026 Earlier language allowing job searching on B-1/B-2 is treated as non-controlling by adjudicators USCIS archive
Matthew Tragesser statement on stricter H-1B oversight Dec. 23, 2025 Signals tougher review of employers and H-1B holders USCIS spokesperson
Matthew Tragesser statement supporting new selection system Jan. 16, 2026 Reinforces stricter H-1B oversight and anti-abuse message USCIS spokesperson
New fee for certain new H-1B petitions through consular processing Sept. 19, 2025 Adds $100,000 cost if worker must leave and return through consular processing Presidential Proclamation
Proclamation 10998 expands travel bans to 39 countries Dec. 16, 2025; effective Jan. 1, 2026 Restricts visa issuance, including B-1/B-2, for many affected nationals Presidential Proclamation 10998
Wage-weighted H-1B selection begins Feb. 27, 2026 Gives an edge to higher-paid roles, making reentry harder for some laid-off workers DHS final rule / USCIS

Key policy details driving risk

Immigration lawyers at Reddy Neumann Brown PC and American Visa Law Group report more RFEs and NOIDs tied to two recurring problems.

First is the Permissible Activity problem. B-1/B-2 is for temporary visitor activity, not open-ended job hunting. A worker may still attend interviews or network. But if the filing shows that the main reason for staying is to find a new H-1B employer, officers may say the person does not fit B-2 intent.

Second is the Intent Trap. Here is the basic problem: a worker files for B-1/B-2, then quickly finds a sponsor and that employer files an H-1B petition. USCIS may look backward and argue the worker never truly planned a visitor stay at all. The later H-1B filing can be used as evidence of preconceived intent or even misrepresentation.

That is why timing matters so much. So does how the case is framed.

Risk Factor Explanation Implications for H-1B holders
Permissible Activity challenge USCIS may question whether job searching is a valid primary purpose for B-2 stay Higher chance of RFEs or NOIDs
Intent Trap Later H-1B filing may be used to argue no real tourist intent existed Possible denial for preconceived intent or misrepresentation
Archived guidance Older USCIS language is no longer treated as controlling Workers cannot rely on past website guidance alone
Denial after grace period If bridge is denied after 60 days, the worker may be out of status immediately Unlawful presence risk rises fast
Consular processing exposure Denied change of status may force departure and visa processing abroad Employer may face $100,000 fee
Travel restrictions Nationals affected by bans may be unable to obtain B-1/B-2 or other visas easily Reentry options may shrink or disappear

If considering B-2 bridge, consult experienced immigration counsel about risk of RFEs/NOIDs and potential denial.

Impacts on individuals during bridge periods

Many laid-off workers still think the 60-day grace period works like an automatic buffer. It does not. It is limited, and it does not erase later denial risk.

If a B-1/B-2 bridge request is denied after that grace period ends, the person may be treated as immediately out of status. From there, unlawful presence can start to build. That can affect future immigration benefits and reentry.

A second problem is employer cost. If the worker cannot complete an H-1B change of status inside the United States and must instead leave for consular processing, the $100,000 “importation of labor” fee can enter the picture for a new H-1B petition under the Sept. 19, 2025 rules. For employers, that is not a small filing issue. It can change hiring decisions.

Removal risk is also getting more attention. Lawyers have reported a higher chance of a Notice to Appear, or NTA, after a withdrawal or denial. That starts removal proceedings.

⚠️ Immediate implications: no guaranteed 60-day grace period; potential NTA risk after withdrawal or denial

Key statistics and facts shaping the problem

The numbers explain why this matters right now.

Global tech layoffs in Q1 2026 topped 45,000. Oracle accounted for about 30,000 cuts. Meta accounted for about 15,800. Those layoffs pushed many H-1B holders into the same narrow grace-period window at once.

Hiring conditions also changed. Starting Feb. 27, 2026, the H-1B system began using a wage-weighted selection model, often described as a weight-based lottery. Higher-salary roles now get priority. That makes the search harder for junior and mid-level workers trying to return from B-1/B-2 to H-1B change of status.

Visitor travel now costs more too. As of Oct. 1, 2025, a $250 Visa Integrity Fee applies to visitor visa applications on top of standard fees. For someone forced to leave and apply abroad, even the basic bridge option has become more expensive.

Key dates to watch

  • Sept. 19, 2025: new $100,000 fee for certain new H-1B petitions through consular processing
  • Dec. 16, 2025: Proclamation 10998 announced expanded restrictions
  • Jan. 1, 2026: travel restrictions tied to 39 countries took effect
  • Feb. 27, 2026: wage-weighted H-1B selection started

Each date changes the risk calculation. Put together, they create a much harsher setting for a B-1/B-2 bridge.

Official references

Workers and employers should review the official materials directly:

For laid-off H-1B holders, the main point is stark: a B-1/B-2 bridge is no longer a routine fallback. Archived guidance, stricter USCIS review, the $100,000 consular fee, and travel limits effective Jan. 1, 2026 have turned delay into danger. Before filing, review the case strategy carefully and measure it against the rules now in force, not the ones people used to quote.

What do you think? 0 reactions
Useful? 0%
Shashank Singh

As a Breaking News Reporter at VisaVerge.com, Shashank Singh is dedicated to delivering timely and accurate news on the latest developments in immigration and travel. His quick response to emerging stories and ability to present complex information in an understandable format makes him a valuable asset. Shashank's reporting keeps VisaVerge's readers at the forefront of the most current and impactful news in the field.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments