Key Takeaways
• ICE will increase raids in sanctuary jurisdictions if they don’t help with federal immigration enforcement.
• Over 6,000 undocumented immigrants were arrested by ICE in the first 100 days of Trump’s administration.
• Federal funding could be withheld from cities and states that refuse to cooperate with ICE agents.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is preparing to act more forcefully in cities and states that do not help with federal immigration enforcement. Todd Lyons, Acting ICE director, spoke directly about this during a recent interview with Fox News. He said if areas often known as “sanctuary jurisdictions” continue not to work with ICE, then the agency will put more resources into those places. “The more they’re going to double down or triple down, we’re going to ramp it up more,” Lyons shared, making it clear that ICE will go after people it sees as threats, even if local governments will not help.
Lyons explained that while the agency always prefers to work with local officials, it will not let a lack of cooperation stop it. “If you don’t want to work with us, we’re going to handle the problem,” he said. By this, he meant that ICE will send agents, bring in special law enforcement teams, and do more direct work in these areas. The purpose, he explained, is mainly to address what ICE calls public safety threats. In simple terms, he believes some immigrants put communities at risk, and ICE wants to remove the most dangerous people first.
Recent ICE Actions and Numbers
According to ICE, recent efforts have been extensive. In the first 100 days after President Trump took office, ICE agents arrested over 6,000 illegal immigrants. Lyons was clear about the focus: “removing the worst of the worst,” such as people with criminal records, violent gang members, sex offenders, and those involved in selling dangerous drugs like fentanyl. These actions are part of the agency’s claim that they keep streets safer by arresting people they believe are a threat.
Even in places known for being protective of undocumented immigrants, ICE is looking for some help. For example, Lyons praised California Governor Gavin Newsom. California is called a “sanctuary state” because it usually limits work with federal immigration agents. But recently, Newsom said the state would help ICE in certain serious cases. This change came after many people were upset about an immigrant with a record of serious driving offenses possibly being let out of jail earlier than expected. Lyons saw this as a good sign that some places may cooperate with ICE, at least in the worst cases.
Background: What Are Sanctuary Jurisdictions and Why Do They Matter?
The phrase “sanctuary jurisdictions” includes cities, counties, or states that limit how much they help enforce federal immigration laws. This can mean local police do not tell ICE when undocumented immigrants are released from jail, or they might not hold people extra time so ICE can pick them up. Officials in these places usually say this makes everyone safer, because immigrants are more willing to report crimes or work with police if they do not fear deportation.
From the other viewpoint, federal officials like the acting ICE director argue it makes their job harder and puts communities at risk. They say it means dangerous people might avoid arrest or removal because local officials do not give ICE the information or time needed to act.
Trump Administration’s Broader Immigration Policy
This “ramp up” of ICE work is part of a much larger plan the Trump administration set out on immigration. The government’s main goal: to make it harder for people to stay in the United States 🇺🇸 illegally, especially those accused or convicted of crimes, and to put pressure on local governments to cooperate.
Tom Homan, who served as “border czar,” has spoken about a strategy with two main parts. First, ICE agents will have a bigger presence in sanctuary jurisdictions. Second, there will be more action at work sites, which means ICE will check more businesses to see if they are hiring people not allowed to work in the country.
One of President Trump’s key actions was signing executive orders to force the issue. He ordered federal departments to create and publish lists naming sanctuary jurisdictions. This puts public pressure on those cities and states. The orders also say money from the federal government could be taken away if a place does not cooperate with ICE and other immigration officers.
This move has real money at stake. Federal funding helps support services like police, fire departments, and health programs in many cities and states. If that funding is lost, it could have big effects, not only on city budgets but also on the people who rely on those services. As reported by VisaVerge.com, cities on the list risk both losing money and facing legal trouble from Washington if they do not begin working more closely with federal agents.
How Sanctuary Jurisdictions and Federal Officials See Things Differently
There has long been a split between local and national leaders over how much states and cities must do to help with immigration enforcement. Many city leaders feel local officers should be focused on local crimes, not enforcing federal rules. They argue that their communities become less safe if immigrants are afraid to report crimes or give information to the police.
Those in favor of strict federal enforcement, including the acting ICE director, believe that failure to work together lets dangerous people avoid being removed from the country. They say it puts regular people at risk and slows down the work of keeping communities safe.
Legal experts point to past court decisions for what cities can and cannot do. The 10th Amendment to the United States 🇺🇸 Constitution is often mentioned. It says the federal government cannot “commandeer,” or force, state officials to do its work for them. Based on this, courts have ruled that local governments can choose if they want to use their own resources to help with immigration enforcement. This means that many sanctuary jurisdictions are on firm legal ground, even if federal officials want them to do more.
Other Obstacles Facing ICE and the Administration
It is not just local government resistance that has made immigration enforcement harder. There have been issues inside the agencies themselves. Caleb Vitello, the acting ICE director before Lyons, was reassigned after concerns that deportation efforts were not happening fast enough. This shows that even at the top levels of ICE, there is pressure to show results, and leadership can change quickly if goals are not met.
There have also been problems with leaks. For instance, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem accused two people of wrongly sharing secret details about planned immigration raids. Such leaks can give people time to hide before ICE agents arrive or cause public protests, making the job harder.
Even as these challenges continue, Congress is thinking about giving ICE more help. Lawmakers are considering a plan to pay for 10,000 more ICE agents nationwide. If approved, Lyons says this jump in staff would be a “game changer,” letting the agency cover more ground and respond faster when it decides to move into sanctuary jurisdictions.
For more about ICE and its role, readers can visit the official ICE enforcement and removal operations page.
What Do These Efforts Mean for the Future?
If ICE follows through with its plans, people living in sanctuary jurisdictions may see more immigration raids in their neighborhoods, workplaces, and public areas. These raids target certain groups, including those with crimes on their records or accused of serious offenses. But even those with less serious violations can get caught up in large enforcement sweeps.
Employers in these places might also feel more pressure. ICE says it will visit more job sites to check records and find people working without the right documents. This could lead to fines or even arrests for employers who break the law by hiring undocumented workers.
The fights between local and federal officials are likely to continue. Cities and states can take their case to court if they think ICE or the Trump administration tries to take funding unfairly. In the past, courts have sometimes supported local areas, saying the federal government cannot force them to spend local resources or change their rules. At the same time, the federal government controls visas, deportations, and border crossings, so it has powerful tools to try to push its policies.
Possible Long-Term Effects on Immigrants and Communities
For immigrants living in the United States 🇺🇸 and especially those in sanctuary jurisdictions, these policies bring worry and confusion. Public raids can frighten not only undocumented immigrants but also their families, neighbors, and even United States 🇺🇸 citizens who live in the same communities.
Some people may avoid going to school, the doctor, or reporting crimes because they fear being arrested by ICE or caught up in enforcement sweeps. This can harm public health and safety and strain relationships between police and community members.
On the other hand, supporters of the administration’s approach say it is needed to force local officials to do more and make communities safer from crime. Lyons and others at ICE say their raids focus on the worst offenders, not regular people going about their lives. Still, critics worry about mistakes, cases of mistaken identity, and the effects on families and children.
Different Points of View
There are strong opinions on both sides of this debate. People who support sanctuary jurisdictions argue that local communities know best how to take care of their own safety. They say federal enforcement changes break trust and make it harder for everyone to get along.
Supporters of the acting ICE director’s position say that local leaders should not pick and choose which laws to follow. They believe it threatens the entire legal system if some cities or states refuse to cooperate. For them, removing people with criminal records protects everyone.
What Comes Next?
As funding is debated in Congress and as both sides consider court action, what happens next will shape how immigration laws are enforced for years to come. Will ICE get more agents and resources as the acting ICE director hopes? Or will the courts hold up the rights of cities to make their own rules about working with federal agencies?
ICE says it will keep ramping up raids wherever it needs to, especially in sanctuary jurisdictions, unless those places begin to work more closely with the federal government. No matter what, these actions will impact immigrants, employers, local police, and neighborhoods in deep and often personal ways.
You can read more about how ICE works and its tools for enforcement at the ICE website.
Summary
Todd Lyons, the acting ICE director, says the agency plans to put more pressure on sanctuary jurisdictions by increasing raids if these areas do not help with immigration enforcement. Recent actions include thousands of arrests focused on people with criminal records, and the Trump administration wants to make local governments cooperate, even threatening to pull funding. While supporters say this will keep communities safer, critics argue it can hurt trust and scare families. With legal battles and debates over federal funding ahead, the future of immigration enforcement in the United States 🇺🇸 is uncertain. As the situation develops, immigrants, employers, and local communities will need to keep a close eye on any changes, and those looking for more information about their rights or specific ICE enforcement practices can find updates on the official ICE website.
Learn Today
Sanctuary jurisdictions → Cities, counties, or states that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities and protect undocumented immigrants from deportation.
ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) → A federal agency responsible for enforcing immigration laws and removing individuals considered threats to public safety.
Executive Order → A directive issued by the President that manages operations of the federal government and can affect immigration enforcement.
Detainer → A request by ICE for local law enforcement to hold an individual so federal agents can take custody for immigration matters.
10th Amendment → Part of the U.S. Constitution granting states power to manage local matters not delegated to the federal government.
This Article in a Nutshell
ICE’s new strategy focuses heavily on sanctuary jurisdictions, increasing raids where local governments limit cooperation. With over 6,000 arrests in Trump’s first 100 days, federal officials pressure cities and states using funding threats. The push sparks intense legal debates, community concerns, and uncertainty for immigrants, families, and employers nationwide.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• ICE raids wrong Oklahoma City home, traumatizes U.S. citizens
• ICE Workplace Raids rise under Trump as Tom Homan vows tougher action
• Immigration Raids Stir Anxiety Among Workers in Restaurant Industry
• DEA raids Colorado Springs club, arrests over 100 undocumented immigrants
• ICE raids target more employers as 2025 I-9 audits increase
