(UNITED KINGDOM) — The UK Home Office imposed visa restrictions on the Democratic Republic of Congo on December 28, 2025, and announced new return agreements with Angola and Namibia as Britain stepped up pressure on countries to accept deportations.
Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood warned the measures against the DRC could escalate to a “complete halting of visas” unless cooperation improves, after the Home Office stripped DRC nationals of fast-track visa processing and revoked preferential “VIP” access for senior officials and politicians.
Government rationale and immediate measures
- The Home Office described the steps as sanctions intended to change the country’s approach to taking back its citizens.
- For the DRC, measures include:
- Removal of fast-track processing for visa applicants.
- Ending VIP access for senior officials and politicians.
- Angola and Namibia avoided sanctions by agreeing to “improve their processes” and accept the return of thousands of irregular migrants and criminals.
“We expect countries to play by the rules. If one of their citizens has no right to be here, they must take them back. I thank Angola and Namibia and welcome their cooperation. Now is the time for the Democratic Republic of Congo to do the right thing: take your citizens back or lose the privilege of entering our country,” Mahmood said.
Context: UK strategy and international coordination
- Britain’s actions reflect an intensified late-2025 push to use visa restrictions as a diplomatic lever with African governments over deportation deals.
- The Home Office frames this as a more “transactional” approach to returns.
- Mahmood has linked the strategy to coordination inside the Five Eyes alliance (U.S., Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the UK), suggesting “considering more coordinated action among the Five Eyes nations” to pressure countries that decline to repatriate nationals. She said this at a summit in London on September 9, 2025.
Political and operational outcomes claimed by the UK
- The Home Office called the Angola and Namibia deals the “first delivery success” of its November 2025 asylum reforms.
- Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper reported on December 28, 2025 that the UK has removed over 50,000 people with no right to remain since July 2024, a 23% increase over the previous period.
Wider scope and countries under review
- UK officials indicated that India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan remain under review for potential visa restrictions if return rates do not improve.
- This suggests the policy scope could extend beyond African states.
Changes under the UK’s new asylum framework
| Policy element | Previous rule | New rule (post-reform) |
|---|---|---|
| Refugee status duration | Indefinite/long-term customary practice | Temporary, reviewed every 30 months |
| Qualifying period for permanent residency | 5 years | 20 years |
- The Home Office also introduced rules aimed at preventing individuals from “blocking their own deportations”, including targeting practices such as refusing to sign travel documents.
Potential effects on DRC nationals
- Loss of fast-track services and removal of VIP access may affect:
- Business travel
- Diplomatic engagement
- Family visits
- Visa processing is being used as a pressure point in the deportations dispute.
U.S. measures and parallel strategy
- Official U.S. documents from DHS and USCIS in 2025 described a mirrored strategy relying on visa sanctions and entry suspensions to pressure non-compliant governments.
- A USCIS policy memorandum dated December 2, 2025 directed a comprehensive re-review of immigration benefit requests for nationals from 19 “high-risk” countries, using security-focused language.
“USCIS has determined the operational necessity to ensure that all asylum applicants and aliens from high-risk countries of concern. do not pose a threat. This process ensures that USCIS exercises its full authority to protect national security,” the memorandum said.
- The U.S. also issued entry limits: a White House proclamation dated December 16, 2025 suspended entry for certain nationals of Angola and Zambia, citing high visa overstay rates (including 14.43% for Angola) and a lack of cooperation on enforcement.
- Officials linked the U.S. approach to Section 243(d) of the INA, which permits visa sanctions against countries deemed uncooperative on removals—paralleling the UK’s use of visa access as leverage.
Criticism and civil-society reaction
- Critics called the approach political theatre.
- Over 100 British charities urged the government to end “performative policies” they say fuel racism and damage diplomatic ties with African partners.
Sources and official publications
- Home Office announcements were published via the UK Home Office newsroom: Home Office announcements
- U.S. materials cited were posted via:
- USCIS policy memoranda: USCIS policy memoranda
- DHS news: DHS news
- Federal Register proclamations: Federal Register proclamations
Key takeaway
- Mahmood framed the UK’s position as conditional access tied to cooperation, warning the DRC that Britain could take tougher steps if returns do not improve and reiterating: “take your citizens back or lose the privilege of entering our country.”
The UK has implemented visa restrictions against the DRC and secured repatriation agreements with Angola and Namibia to increase deportations. This strategy, part of a 2025 asylum reform, uses visa access as diplomatic leverage. Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood indicated this approach is coordinated with Five Eyes partners to pressure uncooperative nations. Despite government claims of success, charities have criticized the measures as performative and diplomatically damaging.
