Key Takeaways
• Trump’s 2018 zero tolerance led to nearly 3,000 family separations at the U.S.-Mexico border.
• Rubio’s 2025 one-strike policy revokes legal status for visa holders committing crimes, including students.
• Zero tolerance targeted border crossers; one-strike affects non-citizens inside the U.S. with legal status.
The topic of immigration enforcement in the United States 🇺🇸 often brings strong opinions and widespread attention. Two key policies have shaped this discussion in recent years: the “zero tolerance” policy rolled out by the Trump administration in 2018 and the newer “one-strike policy: Catch-and-Revoke” introduced in 2025 by Secretary of State Rubio. While these policies are sometimes talked about together, they are different in purpose, time frame, and impact.
Let’s break down what really happened with these policies, how they changed the lives of immigrants and their families, and what their effects might be going forward.

The Trump Administration’s 2018 “Zero Tolerance” Policy
On April 6, 2018, the Trump administration made headlines with its “zero tolerance” policy for illegal border crossings. By May 7, 2018, this policy was in full effect. But what did this mean, and who did it affect?
- Who Did the Policy Target?
This policy was aimed directly at people—referred to by officials as “aliens”—who crossed into the United States 🇺🇸 from the Mexico 🇲🇽 border without permission. It did not target people holding valid visas. Instead, it focused on those who entered outside the regular legal process. -
What Did the Policy Do?
The Department of Justice (DOJ) ordered prosecutors to charge every single adult caught entering the country illegally. There were no exceptions made—not for parents with children, not for people seeking asylum. If you were an adult and crossed the border illegally, you would be charged with a federal crime. -
Why Was This Done?
Attorney General Jeff Sessions said this move aimed to stop illegal migration. He argued that many asylum claims were not truthful and that strict enforcement would keep people from trying to cross the border illegally in the first place. -
How Was It Different from Past Rules?
Laws against illegal entry were not new, but earlier administrations used more discretion, sometimes allowing families or asylum seekers to stay together while their cases went through the system. The Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” simply meant no more exceptions. Every adult who crossed the border without permission was to be prosecuted.
Family Separation and Its Impact
One of the most painful results of “zero tolerance” was family separation. Since adults charged with crimes were held in federal jails—where children are not allowed—the authorities ended up separating kids from their parents. News outlets and advocates reported that almost 3,000 children were separated from their families during this time.
Former White House Chief of Staff John Kelly backed this approach, calling it “a tough deterrent.” He said separating families would scare people away from coming to the United States 🇺🇸 without following the official rules. The administration believed that stronger punishment would slow down illegal crossings.
These family separations caused outcry across the country and around the world. Images and reports of frightened children and confused parents struck a nerve, leading to protests, lawsuits, and heavy criticism. Many Americans, along with advocates for immigrants and human rights, said these punishments caused harm that was far greater than the crime of crossing a border without papers.
Did the Policy Achieve Its Goals?
Data from U.S. government reports and analysis from sources like VisaVerge.com show that prosecutions for illegal border crossings rose sharply in 2018 and 2019. However, the policy did not fully stop migrants from trying to enter the United States 🇺🇸. In some months, the numbers even went up, as desperate families felt they had no other choice.
Many experts, including those at the Congressional Research Service, explained that while stricter enforcement might have slowed some migration, it also overwhelmed the courts and created backlogs for immigration cases.
The End of “Zero Tolerance”
After months of criticism and legal battles, the “zero tolerance” policy faced mounting pressure. When President Biden took office, things changed quickly. On January 26, 2021, Acting Attorney General Monty Wilkinson issued a memo ordering an end to the policy. Prosecutors were told to use more judgement and consider each case individually, especially when children or families were involved.
This change brought some relief, but it also left many families struggling to reunite and heal from the trauma. Reports and research, such as those by Human Rights Watch and other academic studies, continue to document the long-term effects and urge ongoing action for children and parents affected by family separation.
What About Visa Holders?
It is important to clear up a common mistake: the 2018 “zero tolerance” policy did not target visa holders. People with valid visas—like students, workers, or tourists—were not affected by this crackdown unless they were also caught crossing the border illegally. The focus was almost entirely on those crossing without permission and without going through any visa or official channel. This had big effects on certain communities but did not touch visa rules or the process for getting a visa.
The “One-Strike Policy: Catch-and-Revoke” (2025)
Fast forward to 2025, where a new player, Secretary of State Rubio, announced an entirely different policy. This policy, which took effect after a press conference on May 2, 2025, is called the “one-strike policy: Catch-and-Revoke.”
- Who Does the Policy Affect?
This time, the focus is on non-U.S. citizens who are living in the United States 🇺🇸 but have some type of legal status—this includes visa holders, students, and immigrants with green cards or other permissions. -
What Is the Policy?
Secretary of State Rubio stated that when the government catches a non-citizen breaking U.S. laws, it will take action to revoke that person’s status—meaning they could lose their right to stay in the country. The rules extend to students who have “supported terrorists or otherwise abused our hospitality.” It also covers people convicted of crimes like domestic violence or assault. -
Why Is It Happening?
The stated purpose is to make sure that those who are invited to live, study, or work in the United States 🇺🇸 respect the laws. Officials say this is about protecting public safety and national security.
How Is It Different from “Zero Tolerance”?
This policy is not about border crossings or illegal entry. It’s about what happens after someone is already inside the country, holding a visa or other legal status. If you break the law—even once—you could now lose your visa or green card under the “one-strike” rule.
What Crimes Lead to Revocation?
So far, the policy lists crimes like:
- Domestic violence
- Assault
- Supporting terrorist activity (for students)
- “Abusing hospitality” (which means not following the rules set for guests in the country)
This “one-strike” approach is stricter than previous standards, where only certain crimes (called “aggravated felonies” or “crimes of moral turpitude”) would automatically trigger deportation. Now, almost any crime on the list could result in losing your status.
Potential Impact on Immigrants and Students
The new rule brings up several questions for immigrants, students, and employers:
- For Immigrants and Visa Holders:
If you are living and working in the United States 🇺🇸 with a visa or green card, you need to be very careful not to break any laws. Even a single offense can put your legal status at risk. -
For Students:
International students are now under greater scrutiny. Any connection to terrorist groups or even breaking university rules can have serious results. Schools must work closely with international students to explain these risks. -
For Employers:
Businesses that hire foreign workers must ensure their employees follow all laws, both inside and outside the workplace. Even off-duty issues can lead to visa revocation. -
For Colleges and Universities:
Schools may need to give clearer guidance to foreign students about American laws and rules, especially those related to safety and security.
Is There Any Room for Mistakes?
With a “one-strike” system, there is little space for errors. Unlike the Trump administration’s focus on border enforcement, this policy is about life inside the country and could affect thousands of lawful residents if not managed carefully.
The Public Response and Ongoing Debate
Both the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” and Secretary of State Rubio’s “one-strike” policy have sparked strong reactions:
- Supporters Say:
These measures are needed to keep the country safe and make sure immigration laws are respected. They argue that strong action against lawbreakers sends a clear message to the world. -
Critics Say:
Such policies cause unfair harm to families, students, and workers who might make small mistakes. They warn that a “one-size-fits-all” approach could punish people more harshly than necessary. -
Legal Experts Weigh In:
Attorneys and advocacy groups are watching closely. They note that while keeping people safe is important, making rules too strict can sometimes lead to unfair results. They also warn that these policies might create more fear among immigrants and discourage students from coming to the United States 🇺🇸.
Key Differences Between the Policies
Although people sometimes mix them up, these two policies are not the same:
“Zero Tolerance” (Trump Administration, 2018) | “One-Strike Policy: Catch-and-Revoke” (Secretary of State Rubio, 2025) |
---|---|
Targeted border crossers without visas | Targets non-citizens already inside the country |
Focused on criminal prosecution at entry | Focuses on revoking legal status after criminal offenses |
Led to family separation | Can lead to removal for many types of crimes |
Ended in January 2021 by President Biden | Launched in 2025 and currently active |
What Should Immigrants and Visa Holders Do Now?
If you’re living in the United States 🇺🇸 or planning to come:
- Make sure you understand all the laws that apply to you.
- Follow school, workplace, and community rules—no matter how small they might seem.
- If you’re unsure, speak with a trusted legal advisor or check the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services website for official updates.
Conclusion: Looking Ahead
Immigration policy in the United States 🇺🇸 continues to change with new leaders and new concerns. The Trump administration’s zero tolerance approach in 2018 and Secretary of State Rubio’s catch-and-revoke rule in 2025 show the trend toward stricter enforcement.
While the goal of keeping the country safe is clear, these policies also remind us of the challenges families, students, and workers face as they try to build new lives in a different country. Following the rules is now more important than ever.
For those affected or worried, keeping up with official guidance and getting good advice is key. As the situation develops, resources like VisaVerge.com and official government listings will remain important places to learn about any new policies, rights, or changes ahead.
Learn Today
Zero Tolerance Policy → A 2018 Trump directive requiring federal prosecution for all adults illegally crossing the U.S. southern border, without exceptions.
One-Strike Policy → A 2025 rule under Secretary Rubio revoking visas or green cards from non-citizens committing certain crimes in the U.S.
Family Separation → The practice of dividing children from parents due to prosecution or detention, affecting nearly 3,000 families in 2018.
Aggravated Felony → A U.S. immigration law term for serious crimes that usually trigger automatic deportation proceedings for non-citizens.
Asylum Claim → A formal request by migrants for protection based on fear of persecution in their home countries, often assessed at border entries.
This Article in a Nutshell
Immigration policies in the U.S. shifted sharply with Trump’s 2018 zero tolerance, separating families at the border, and Rubio’s 2025 one-strike rule, revoking statuses for lawful residents breaking laws. These approaches affect immigrants, students, and families differently and highlight the increasing importance of following every regulation and legal requirement closely.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• ICP waives residency fines for Sudanese nationals in UAE until 2025 end
• Malta work permit scam: Man charged for using fake passport
• IndiGo Airlines cabin crew member assaulted on Delhi-Shirdi flight
• Todd Lyons Warns: ICE Will Arrest Noncompliant
• Florida National Guardsmen could become immigration judges under new proposal