Trump administration invokes Alien Enemies Act in new deportation push

Key Takeaways

• Trump administration uses Alien Enemies Act to expedite removals, targeting Venezuelans tied to Tren de Aragua.
• Over 900,000 migrants lose CBP One parole, required to leave or face long-term bans.
• Daily arrest quotas reach 1,200 undocumented immigrants, fueling increased detention center capacity nationwide.

Deportation in the United States 🇺🇸 has always been a complex topic, but the Trump administration’s latest actions in 2025 have created a new, much stricter environment for immigrants. These recent moves use old laws, strict new rules, and a range of aggressive tools to quickly remove people from the country. The steps taken are broader and more direct than ever before, affecting hundreds of thousands of people and raising concerns about fairness, legal rights, and the impact on families and communities.

Trump Administration Drastically Expands Deportation Policy

The Trump administration has turned up the pressure on immigrants since the start of 2025. Its approach is different from earlier efforts in both speed and size. These are some of the key features:

• Using the old Alien Enemies Act in new ways
• Canceling many protections for people who entered using the CBP One app
• Deputizing more agencies, like the IRS and military, to act as immigration officers
• Pushing daily fines for those who ignore removal orders
  – Setting high arrest quotas and creating new detention sites for mass deportation

Let’s look more closely at how each of these steps works and who is affected.

Alien Enemies Act: Old Law, New Use

A major change comes from how the administration is now using the Alien Enemies Act. This law, passed in 1798, was created during wartime to allow the government to arrest and remove noncitizens seen as threats. The Trump administration is now using it during peacetime, mainly against groups from Venezuela 🇻🇪, linking many to criminal organizations such as Tren de Aragua.

• Who is affected? Venezuelan nationals accused of having ties, sometimes with little proof, to groups like Tren de Aragua are now at risk.
• What makes this different? The act allows the government to skip the usual court process. People can be detained or removed much faster, even before having a chance to see a judge.
• What have courts said? Federal judges quickly stepped in. Some removals have been put on hold because there are concerns that people do not get a fair hearing or enough time to defend themselves. The Supreme Court later confirmed that everyone facing deportation—no matter which law is used—must have a chance to defend themselves and receive due process.
• How big is this? No official number is given here, but the effort is significant, since entire groups are being labeled as “enemies” based only on their nationality or suspected ties.

This use of the Alien Enemies Act has led to heated debate. Some believe using a wartime law in peacetime is unfair and possibly unconstitutional, while others argue it’s necessary to keep the country safe. Groups like the ACLU say this oversteps the government’s authority and can lead to mistakes, such as removing those who pose no actual threat.

CBP One Parole Canceled: What Does This Mean for Migrants?

During President Biden’s time, a system called CBP One made it possible for people to schedule asylum interviews at the border and seek temporary protection from being deported. Many used this app as a safe way to get their case heard.

Now, the Trump administration is canceling parole given to people who entered this way:

• Over 900,000 people may lose their temporary protection and face removal.
• These people are being told to leave on their own before being deported. If they wait and are caught, they risk being banned from reentering the United States 🇺🇸 for a very long time.
• There are some exceptions—Ukrainians allowed under United for Ukraine and Afghans from Operation Allies Welcome still get protection.

This has led to confusion and fear among those who followed legal steps but now face deportation. Supporters of the change say the original program was too broad and created loopholes, but critics say it punishes people who tried to play by the rules. According to the Migration Policy Institute, nearly a million people who used the CBP One app to find safety in the United States 🇺🇸 are now forced to choose between leaving voluntarily or facing a forced removal and a long-term ban.

If you’re affected by this change, the new policies are already in effect, and you may have received a notice to depart. You can check current guidance and legal requirements at the official U.S. Customs and Border Protection site.

Making More Agencies Responsible: Registry Rule and Bureaucratic Expansion

The Trump administration is not only using immigration officers for removals. New steps have deputized other government groups, such as the IRS and DEA, to help find, detain, and remove unauthorized immigrants. Even the military is reportedly assisting federal agents. This move is part of a wider registry rule meant to track noncitizens and speed up enforcement:

• Agencies with no immigration role in the past—like Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)—now help find out who might be living in the country without permission.
• Federal prosecutors, local law enforcement, and even military troops are being told to find and arrest unauthorized immigrants.
• This makes immigration enforcement a top priority for the U.S. 🇺🇸 government across all levels and departments.
• Some critics say that this could create confusion and put people at risk of mistakes or over-policing.

The registry rule’s details are not widely published, but the bigger goal is clear: make it much harder for unauthorized immigrants to live in the United States 🇺🇸 without being detected. The idea is to track where people are, what they do, and catch those who remain after being told to leave.

Fines for Overstaying Removal Orders: Another Form of Pressure

For those who are ordered to leave the country, failure to do so now brings new financial penalties.

• The Trump administration is pushing daily fines for individuals who overstay their final removal order.
• These fines add pressure to leave, as people who ignore the order can quickly find themselves facing large debts.
• These penalties are not spelled out in great detail in current public information, but it’s clear that the approach is to make it costly to refuse to depart.

This system builds on past efforts to make noncompliance with immigration orders too risky and expensive to ignore, encouraging people to depart on their own.

Mass Arrests and Expanded Detention: More Quotas, More Jail Space

To meet its goals, the Trump administration has set demanding quotas and is working quickly to build or secure space to hold thousands more people:

• Federal officers face an arrest quota of 1,200 undocumented immigrants each day. This is more than double that seen before in the United States 🇺🇸, even during President Trump’s first term.
• To support this higher number, new detention centers are being built. Private companies and state governments are stepping in, especially in Texas 🇺🇸, offering space in state-run jails or proposing entirely new facilities.
• These steps raise the total detention capacity to nearly 40,000 people at one time.

This represents a major escalation. It means that, on any given day, tens of thousands of people might be held while waiting for removal, with states like Texas 🇺🇸 eager to provide the space needed.

Legal Pushback: Courts Step In

A key feature of the story is the role of courts. Even with aggressive policy changes, the judicial system has been a check on the Trump administration’s efforts.

• Federal judges have issued restraining orders that stop or slow down some removals, especially those under the Alien Enemies Act. Their main concern is that people need a fair process, even when facing a possible threat claim.
• The Supreme Court has stated that due process is required for all, no matter what law is invoked by the government.
• Many legal battles remain, especially over using old laws for new purposes and over which government powers are allowed without clear evidence of a threat.

Groups supporting immigrants have said many of these steps go too far by skipping the usual checks and protections. They argue that labeling almost any group as “enemy” can lead to mistakes, break up families, and create fear in communities.

Table: Summary of Major Measures

Here’s a simple look at some of the key steps:

Immediate and Long-Term Effects

The changes impact many groups:

• Immigrants: Hundreds of thousands now face faster removal. Venezuelans 🇻🇪, especially those accused of ties to Tren de Aragua, face the harshest risk. Many who believed they were following the law via CBP One are losing their protections.
• Employers: Businesses that hire immigrants may be affected, especially in states where new partnerships with detention centers change who is eligible to work and live locally.
• States & Local Governments: Texas 🇺🇸 and other states are helping build new infrastructure, which changes local budgets and priorities.
• Families: Those with mixed-status families (some members citizens, others not) can be separated, leading to hardship and uncertainty.
• Schools & Communities: Sudden removal and detention risk pulling students from classrooms and causing fear in neighborhoods.

Over time, these changes could lead to larger communities living in fear, greater use of courts to challenge removals, and even a shift in how the United States 🇺🇸 is seen around the world for how it treats noncitizens.

Debate and Controversy

Not everyone agrees about these steps.

• Some believe the Trump administration is finally enforcing immigration laws in a way that protects Americans and keeps out those who might be dangerous, especially in cases linked to groups like Tren de Aragua from Venezuela 🇻🇪.
• Others say the moves are too harsh, target people unfairly, and break with the country’s tradition of fairness, due process, and welcoming those who seek safety.

The debate goes on in courts, in Congress, and across communities. Legal pushback will likely continue for some time, especially since some courts have already stepped in to stop removals until basic rights are protected.

As reported by VisaVerge.com, many fear that using sweeping authorities like the Alien Enemies Act for mass removal—especially for those with only alleged gang ties—may set a precedent for future actions against broad groups of people.

What Comes Next?

If you or someone you know is affected, it’s important to stay informed about your rights, what notices you receive, and what legal help may be available. Court cases and future policies will decide how long these changes stay in place.

For more on the ongoing changes, official information, and rights, visit the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services website.

In Summary

The 2025 strategy of the Trump administration marks a big shift in U.S. 🇺🇸 immigration policy. It uses rare laws like the Alien Enemies Act, ends modern parole programs such as CBP One, and greatly increases detention and removal. Venezuelans 🇻🇪, especially those accused of links to the Tren de Aragua gang, are a main focus. With new arrest quotas and detention centers, the scale is larger than before. Courts have stopped some changes to protect legal rights, but the full impact is still unclear.

The debate will likely shape immigration for years to come, affecting immigrants, employers, states, and families all over the country. While some see the actions as necessary, many others worry about fairness, rights, and what this means for the nation’s future.

Learn Today

Alien Enemies Act → A 1798 law letting the government detain or deport foreign nationals considered threats, now used against Venezuelans.
CBP One Parole → A program allowing migrants to seek U.S. asylum appointments and temporary protection, now revoked for most participants.
Tren de Aragua → A Venezuelan criminal organization cited as justification for targeting certain nationals under new deportation measures.
Registry Rule → A policy expanding which government agencies can participate in immigration enforcement, including non-traditional groups.
Expedited Removal → A quick deportation process where individuals can be removed without a full court hearing under specific laws.

This Article in a Nutshell

The Trump administration’s 2025 deportation policy uses outdated laws, deputizes many agencies, and implements mass removals. Venezuelans, especially those linked to Tren de Aragua, and CBP One parolees are heavily impacted. Courts have intervened partially, but sweeping enforcement and high arrest quotas set an aggressive, controversial new standard affecting families and communities.
— By VisaVerge.com

Read more:

• US judge orders release of Venezuelan couple, halts some deportations
• Fear of Deportation Keeps Many Immigrants from Seeking Medical Care
• Deportations in Connecticut rise as businesses feel the impact
• DHS faces scrutiny over deportations carried out by DoD despite court orders
• Republican Representative calls for immediate deportation of undocumented migrants