Epping Forest Plans to House Asylum Seekers Withdrawn, Council Confirms

The Epping Forest Council has officially withdrawn its plan to convert Loppet Hall into asylum seeker housing following intense public backlash and high renovation costs. The decision follows a 2,300-signature petition and protests. The Home Office is currently scouting alternative locations in nearby towns to help reduce the national hotel backlog and daily costs of £8.3 million.

?Key takeawaysVisaVerge.com
  • Epping Forest District Council withdrew asylum housing plans for Loppet Hall following overwhelming local opposition.
  • A public consultation revealed 92% of residents opposed the proposal due to strained local infrastructure.
  • The former care home will now be marketed for affordable housing instead of migrant accommodation.

(LOUGHTON, ESSEX, UNITED KINGDOM) — Epping Forest District Council withdrew plans on December 23, 2025 to house up to 200 asylum seekers in the former Loppet Hall care home in Loughton after a consultation that drew more than 1,200 responses and heavy local opposition.

Decision and official statements

Epping Forest Plans to House Asylum Seekers Withdrawn, Council Confirms
Epping Forest Plans to House Asylum Seekers Withdrawn, Council Confirms

Chris Whitbread, leader of Epping Forest District Council, said in a council press release published December 23, 2025, at 4:15 PM GMT:

“After careful consideration of the overwhelming public feedback and logistical challenges, the council has decided not to proceed with housing asylum seekers at Loppet Hall.”

Quick facts: Loppet Hall decision
Consultation responses
More than 1,200
92% opposed (as stated by council)
Petition signatures
2,300
Led by local resident Sarah Jenkins
Proposed capacity
Up to 200 asylum seekers
Originally planned under Dispersed Asylum Housing model
Renovation cost
£500,000
Council said building would require this amount in repairs

Council officials said the consultation received over 1,200 responses, with 92% opposing the proposal to use Loppet Hall, a former care home in Loughton (within Epping Forest in Essex).

Background of the proposal

  • The plan had been due to start in January 2026 under the Home Office’s Dispersed Asylum Housing model.
  • The Home Office had contracted Serco to use the site.
  • Loppet Hall closed as a care home in 2023.
  • The council said the building would require £500,000 in renovations, making the proposal uneconomical.

Local opposition and concerns

Local opposition included a petition with 2,300 signatures led by Sarah Jenkins, a local resident. The petition cited concerns about:

  • Pressure on local GP services
  • Strain on schools
  • Impact on local transport

Epping Forest District Council also pointed to broader infrastructure concerns, saying Loughton lacks capacity. The council cited NHS data showing The Loughton Surgery (the nearest GP) already has 4-month wait times.

Residents demonstrated in person as well: on December 20, 2025, about 150 people protested outside Loppet Hall. The protest was organised by the Epping Forest Against Asylum Housing group, chaired by David Murray, a local businessman. Essex Police reported no arrests at the protest.

Home Office response and next steps

The Home Office confirmed on December 22, 2025 in a letter to the council signed by Matthew Rycroft, Director of Asylum Operations, that it would:

“seek alternative accommodations without penalty.”

Home Office officials said alternative sites were being identified in nearby Harlow and Chelmsford for the 200 asylum seekers originally earmarked for Loughton.

National context and pressures

  • The Home Office has been trying to reduce reliance on hotels, which have been widely used to accommodate asylum seekers while claims are processed.
  • Home Office statistics show a national backlog of 108,000 asylum cases as of November 2025. This backlog has driven efforts to find more sites through the Dispersed Asylum Housing model.

A Local Government Association (LGA) report from December 2025 said the Loughton decision aligns with 17 similar rejections by councils in 2025.

The LGA report also noted:
– The Home Office housed 52,000 asylum seekers in hotels as of Q3 2025.
– That cost was £8.3 million per day for hotel use.
– Councils are being asked to accommodate more people to shift away from hotels.

These pressures coincided with legislative changes under the Labour government’s Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill, passed July 10, 2025, which expedites deportations but increases dispersal needs.

Reactions from charities and local government

  • Enver Solomon, CEO of the Refugee Council, criticised the council’s withdrawal on December 23, 2025 in a BBC interview:

    “This knee-jerk reaction exacerbates the hotel crisis and delays integration.”

  • Claire Holland, LGA Asylum Lead, said in a December 24, 2025 statement:

    “Councils face impossible choices with Home Office funding at £49.88 per asylum seeker per night, below actual costs.”

Council’s future plans for Loppet Hall

Epping Forest District Council said it will now market Loppet Hall for affordable housing, abandoning the earlier plan to use the site for asylum accommodation.

Key facts and timeline

Date Event
2023 Loppet Hall closed as a care home
November 2025 National asylum backlog: 108,000 cases
Q3 2025 52,000 asylum seekers housed in hotels; cost £8.3 million/day
July 10, 2025 Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill passed
December 20, 2025 150-person protest outside Loppet Hall
December 22, 2025 Home Office letter from Matthew Rycroft offering to seek alternatives
December 23, 2025 Council withdrew Loppet Hall asylum plan (press release at 4:15 PM GMT)
December 24, 2025 LGA statement from Claire Holland on funding shortfalls

What happens next

  • The council will market Loppet Hall for affordable housing.
  • The Home Office is identifying alternative sites in nearby towns (Harlow and Chelmsford) for the 200 asylum seekers.
  • Councils and the Home Office continue to seek ways to relieve hotel use while managing local capacity and public concern.

Important: The controversy highlights a national tension between the need to reduce hotel use for asylum accommodation and local infrastructure limits and public opposition.

For more information:
eppingforestdc.gov.uk
– gov.uk/asylum-accommodation
– Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill

?Learn today
Dispersed Asylum Housing
A Home Office model where asylum seekers are accommodated in local communities rather than centralized hotels.
Local Government Association (LGA)
The national membership body for local authorities in England and Wales.
Home Office
The UK government department responsible for immigration, security, and law and order.
Serco
A private contractor used by the UK government to manage asylum seeker accommodation and services.

?This Article in a Nutshell

Epping Forest District Council canceled a proposal to house 200 asylum seekers at Loppet Hall after a consultation with 1,200 responses showed 92% opposition. Concerns over GP wait times and a £500,000 renovation bill led to the withdrawal. The Home Office will now look for alternative sites in Harlow and Chelmsford, while the council plans to repurpose the building for affordable housing.

People also ask

Answers from VisaVerge guides
What happened with the Epping Forest District Council's attempt to close an asylum hotel?

Epping Forest District Council secured a High Court injunction to stop a hotel from housing asylum seekers but that order was overturned on appeal, limiting councils’ ability to rely on planning law to block asylum hotels.

Read: Legal action to close asylum hotels largely ruled out
How did Epping Forest District Council respond to the High Court ruling allowing the Bell Hotel to remain open for asylum seekers?

They voted to challenge the court's decision legally and propose stricter measures to control protests around the hotel, aiming to curb disorder and protect local residents.

Read: Epping councillors push tighter protest limits at Bell Hotel asylum
Why did Epping Forest Council seek to stop the use of the Bell Hotel for asylum seekers?

The council believes the hotel’s current use breaches planning rules and poses risks to public safety.

Read: Epping council tells court Bell Hotel asylum housing is ‘very serious problem’
Why did Epping Forest District Council file for an interim injunction against Bell Hotel's use as an asylum accommodation site?

The council argued that using the Bell Hotel to house asylum seekers is not a lawful use and has led to unrest near local schools and residential care homes.

Read: High Court grants temporary ban on arrivals at Epping asylum hotel
What specific concerns does Epping Forest District Council have about the Bell Hotel being used as an asylum seeker accommodation?

The council is concerned that using the Bell Hotel as asylum seeker accommodation breaches planning permission and poses a risk of escalating community tensions, citing recent protests and public disorder.

Read: Fury as Home Office to Move Male Asylum Seekers into Small Market Town Hotel
What do you think? 168 reactions
Useful? 100%
Lukas Brandt

Lukas Brandt covers UK and European immigration for VisaVerge.com, from the post-Brexit UK visa system and Indefinite Leave to Remain to immigration routes across the EU. He follows Home Office and European policy shifts closely, explaining what they mean for workers, students, and families on the move. Lukas's reporting is the go-to resource for readers navigating immigration on both sides of the Channel.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments