Chicago Protesters Rally Against California National Guard Deployment

Key Takeaways

• On June 9, 2025, protesters gathered in Chicago over California National Guard’s deployment to Los Angeles.
• President Trump deployed National Guard troops without California Governor Newsom’s approval using emergency powers.
• ICE raids led to dozens of arrests; protests in LA and Chicago resulted in thousands demonstrating.

On June 9, 2025, hundreds of people gathered at Daley Plaza in Chicago for a protest that drew national attention. The Chicago protest was organized by immigrant advocates, elected officials, and union leaders. Their goal was to speak out against President Donald Trump’s decision to send the California National Guard to Los Angeles. This move came after a weekend of intense immigration raids and growing unrest in several major cities.

What Happened and Why It Matters

President Trump ordered hundreds of National Guard troops to Los Angeles over the weekend, bypassing California Governor Gavin Newsom’s authority. This is the first time in decades that the National Guard has been sent to a state without the governor’s request. The deployment followed a series of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in Los Angeles, which led to dozens of migrant arrests. Protests in LA quickly turned chaotic, with demonstrators blocking highways, setting fires, and clashing with law enforcement. Police responded with tear gas, rubber bullets, and flash-bang grenades.

The Chicago protest was a direct response to these events. Speakers at the rally, including Rep. Jesús “Chuy” García, union leaders, and local immigrant advocates, condemned the use of military force against civilians and called for an end to what they described as fear tactics targeting immigrant communities.

Key Developments and Timeline

• June 8-9, 2025: National Guard troops arrived in downtown Los Angeles to protect federal buildings, especially the main detention center where protests were focused.
• June 9, 2025: Hundreds gathered at Daley Plaza in Chicago to protest the deployment and ongoing ICE raids.
• Dozens of migrants were arrested in Los Angeles during the weekend’s ICE operations.
• Thousands of protesters participated in demonstrations in both Los Angeles and Chicago.

Why Did President Trump Deploy the National Guard?

President Trump described the situation as a national emergency. He said the deployment was necessary to restore order and protect federal property. According to analysis from VisaVerge.com, this action bypassed the usual process, which requires a governor’s request before federal troops are sent to a state. Instead, President Trump used his emergency powers, possibly under the Insurrection Act, to send the California National Guard without Governor Newsom’s approval.

Governor Newsom and Mayor Bass Respond

Governor Gavin Newsom of California strongly condemned the deployment, calling it a “serious breach of state sovereignty.” He formally requested the removal of the Guard troops on June 8. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass also criticized the move, blaming it for making tensions worse and urging protesters to remain peaceful.

Union and Community Leaders Speak Out

Union leaders played a major role in both the Los Angeles and Chicago protests. David Huerta, president of SEIU California, was detained during the LA protests, highlighting the involvement of labor groups. Genie Kastrup, president of SEIU Local 1 in Chicago, called the deployment an “abuse of power” aimed at dividing communities.

Rep. García, speaking at the Chicago protest, accused President Trump of using fear to control immigrant communities and promised continued support for those affected by the raids and military presence.

How the National Guard Deployment Works

The process for deploying the National Guard in this situation involved several steps:

1. Presidential Order: President Trump issued an order under his emergency powers or the Insurrection Act, allowing him to send troops without the governor’s approval.
2. Troop Mobilization: Hundreds of National Guard members were sent to Los Angeles, focusing on protecting federal buildings and detention centers.
3. Coordination with Federal Agencies: The Guard worked alongside federal law enforcement, including ICE and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), to manage crowds and secure facilities.

This approach raised serious legal and constitutional questions about federal overreach and the use of military force in domestic situations.

ICE Raids and Data Subpoenas

At the same time, ICE increased its enforcement actions in major cities like Chicago and Los Angeles. In Chicago, ICE issued subpoenas to city officials, demanding personal information from the CityKey ID program. This program is widely used by immigrants for identification and access to city services.

The steps in an ICE raid typically include:

• Targeted Operations: ICE agents focus on workplaces and neighborhoods with large immigrant populations.
• Detention and Processing: Individuals suspected of immigration violations are detained and processed for possible removal.
• Data Requests: ICE may issue subpoenas to local governments, asking for information that could help identify and locate immigrants.

Chicago officials and advocates have urged the city to refuse these subpoenas, citing privacy and safety concerns for immigrant residents.

Legal and Constitutional Concerns

Legal experts from institutions like the Brennan Center and Emory University School of Law have warned that using military force against protesters and immigrants is a “stunning abuse of power.” They say it could violate constitutional norms, especially the First Amendment, which protects the right to free speech and peaceful assembly.

The use of the Insurrection Act, a law that allows the president to deploy military forces within the United States 🇺🇸 during emergencies, is especially controversial. Critics argue that it sets a dangerous precedent and could erode civil liberties.

Historical Context

California has a long history of controversial National Guard deployments during times of civil unrest. In the past, these actions have sometimes led to overreactions and tragic outcomes, especially during labor strikes and protests. The last major use of the National Guard in California without a governor’s request happened decades ago, making the current situation highly unusual.

President Trump’s administration has increasingly relied on executive orders and emergency powers to bypass traditional checks on immigration enforcement and military deployment. This pattern has led to more frequent confrontations between federal and state governments.

Impact on Immigrant Communities

The recent actions have had a deep impact on immigrant communities in both Los Angeles and Chicago. Many people report feeling afraid and anxious, worried about “forced disappearances,” family separations, and the possibility of being targeted by law enforcement. Advocates warn that these tactics discourage immigrants from participating in civic life, such as attending school, going to work, or seeking medical care.

Union leaders and labor organizations see the crackdown as an attack on working people and a way to silence those who speak out against government policies.

Multiple Perspectives on the Crisis

• Federal Government: Officials say the deployment is necessary to restore order and protect federal property during a national emergency.
• State and Local Leaders: Governors, mayors, and city officials argue that the move is unconstitutional and only makes tensions worse. They urge peaceful protest and legal resistance.
• Immigrant Advocates: Community groups view the actions as part of a larger campaign to intimidate and destabilize immigrant communities.
• Law Enforcement: Police and other agencies must balance public safety with protecting constitutional rights. They often find themselves caught between conflicting orders from federal and local leaders.

Municipal Resistance and Data Privacy

In Chicago, officials are pushing back against federal demands for immigrant data. The CityKey program, run by the Office of the City Clerk, provides identification cards to residents, including many immigrants. ICE’s request for this data has sparked a debate about privacy and the city’s responsibility to protect its residents.

Advocacy groups like the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights (ICIRR) and SEIU Local 1 are urging city leaders to stand firm and refuse to share information that could put immigrants at risk.

Policy Implications and What Comes Next

The deployment of the California National Guard and the increase in ICE raids have intensified the debate over federal versus state authority. The situation has also raised important questions about the use of military force in civil matters and the protection of civil liberties.

Governor Newsom has threatened legal action against the federal government, and lawsuits over the deployment and ICE subpoenas are likely. Both Chicago and Los Angeles advocates have promised to keep up the pressure through public demonstrations and legal advocacy.

The Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Defense are currently under a 90-day review to decide if more military involvement is needed, including the possible broader use of the Insurrection Act. Congress is also expected to hold hearings and investigations into the legality and impact of these actions, especially as the 2026 budget process moves forward.

Practical Guidance for Affected Communities

If you or someone you know is affected by these developments, here are some steps you can take:

• Stay Informed: Follow updates from official sources like the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and local government websites.
• Know Your Rights: Immigrants have certain rights, even if they are not citizens. Learn about your rights during encounters with law enforcement and ICE.
• Seek Legal Help: Contact local advocacy groups or legal aid organizations for support and advice.
• Protect Your Data: Be cautious about sharing personal information, especially with government agencies. Ask city officials about their policies on data privacy.
• Participate Safely: If you choose to join protests or public demonstrations, do so peacefully and follow local laws.

Summary Table: Key Developments

Looking Ahead: What to Watch For

• Legal Challenges: Expect lawsuits and court battles over the National Guard deployment and ICE’s data requests.
• Continued Protests: Advocates in Chicago, Los Angeles, and other cities plan to keep organizing rallies and public events.
• Policy Reviews: Federal agencies are reviewing their use of military force in domestic situations.
• Congressional Action: Lawmakers will likely investigate the events and consider new laws to clarify the limits of presidential power in these situations.

Where to Find More Information

For the most up-to-date information, check official government websites, such as the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and follow trusted news sources. Local advocacy groups like ICIRR and SEIU Local 1 can also provide support and updates for affected communities.

As reported by VisaVerge.com, the events in Chicago and Los Angeles mark a turning point in the national debate over immigration enforcement and the use of military force in civil matters. The outcome of these protests, legal challenges, and policy reviews will shape the future of immigration policy and civil rights in the United States 🇺🇸 for years to come.

Action Steps for Readers

• Stay connected with local organizations for support and updates.
• Contact your elected officials to share your views on these issues.
• Learn about your rights and responsibilities if you are part of an immigrant community.
• Monitor official government sources for changes in policy or law.

The Chicago protest and the deployment of the California National Guard highlight the ongoing struggle over immigration policy, state versus federal authority, and the rights of all people to live without fear. As the situation develops, it is important for everyone—immigrants, advocates, and the general public—to stay informed and engaged.

Learn Today

National Guard → A state-based military force that can be federalized for national emergencies or state duties.
ICE → Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the federal agency enforcing immigration laws and conducting raids.
Insurrection Act → A federal law allowing the president to deploy military forces domestically during emergencies.
Governor → The elected state leader who typically must approve National Guard deployment within their state.
CityKey → Chicago’s municipal ID program used by residents, including immigrants, for access to city services.

This Article in a Nutshell

The deployment of California’s National Guard in Los Angeles without gubernatorial approval sparked nationwide protests, including a significant rally in Chicago protesting federal overreach and ICE raids. This unprecedented action raises constitutional concerns over military use in civil matters, igniting fierce debate on immigration policy and state versus federal powers.
— By VisaVerge.com