Key Takeaways
• In June 2025, FBI arrested immigrant organizer Alejandro Orellana in Los Angeles amid activist protests.
• The FBI investigates protest funding, focusing on CHIRLA and CARECEN for possible illegal or foreign influence.
• Congress probes billionaire Neville Singham’s alleged support for far-left groups tied to LA protests.
Federal Scrutiny of Immigrant Justice Organizers in Los Angeles: FBI Actions Raise Alarm Among Advocates
Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How

In June 2025, tensions in Los Angeles reached new heights as immigrant justice advocates accused the FBI of targeting protest organizers involved in immigrant rights activism. The situation unfolded after a series of anti-ICE protests and federal immigration enforcement actions in the city. The FBI, led by Director Kash Patel, launched investigations into both the organizers and the funding behind these protests, raising concerns among activists, legal experts, and community groups about the impact on civil liberties and the future of immigrant advocacy.
Key Incidents: Arrests and FBI Actions
The most notable recent event occurred on June 12, 2025, when Alejandro Orellana, a well-known immigrant rights activist and organizer with Centro CSO, was arrested during a home raid. Orellana faces charges of conspiracy to commit civil disorders and aiding and abetting civil disorders. Two weeks later, FBI agents executed a search warrant at the home of Verita Topete, another Centro CSO member. During the operation, agents seized her phone and, according to reports, left her with visible bruises. These actions have sparked immediate backlash from immigrant justice advocates, who are calling for all charges to be dropped and for an end to what they describe as federal intimidation tactics.
Historical Context: A Pattern of Federal Surveillance
The concerns voiced by today’s immigrant justice advocates are not new. Centro CSO, the organization at the center of recent events, traces its roots to the original Community Service Organization founded in 1947. This group counted civil rights icons like Fred Ross, Edward Roybal, Cesar Chavez, and Dolores Huerta among its members. FBI documents from past decades show that both Chavez and Huerta were heavily monitored by the bureau. Many current activists see the recent FBI actions as a continuation of this long history of federal scrutiny and surveillance of civil rights and immigrant rights organizations.
Wider FBI Investigation: Focus on Protest Funding
In June 2025, the FBI announced a broader investigation into the funding sources behind the anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles. The stated goal is to determine whether any of the money supporting these protests was used to fund illegal activities, such as violence or property damage. The FBI has clarified that it is not investigating the act of funding protests itself, which is legal, but rather the intent behind the funding—especially if it supports criminal acts.
Two major organizations have come under scrutiny:
- Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA): Receives almost $34 million annually in government grants and private donations.
- Central American Resource Center (CARECEN): Also receives significant federal and state grants, as well as private funding.
The FBI is examining whether any of these funds were used for illegal purposes or if there is any foreign influence involved. This investigation is being conducted jointly with the IRS, which is looking into the financial aspects of protest funding.
Political and Congressional Investigations
The situation has also drawn attention from Congress. Republican members of the House Oversight Committee, led by Chairman James Comer, are investigating Neville Singham, a U.S. billionaire with alleged ties to the Chinese Communist Party. Singham is accused of financially supporting far-left groups, including the Party for Socialism and Liberation, which has been linked to organizing protests and riots in Los Angeles. The committee has requested documents and briefings from the Department of Justice about investigations under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) and other laws. This adds another layer of complexity, as lawmakers seek to determine whether foreign money is influencing domestic protest movements.
Law Enforcement and Prosecutorial Response
Los Angeles prosecutors have responded to the protests by filing numerous charges against individuals accused of violent acts, including arson, assault with deadly weapons, and attempted murder. Over eight days of protests, more than 550 people were arrested, mostly for curfew violations and failure to disperse. Alejandro Orellana was specifically charged for allegedly providing face shields to protestors, which authorities claim were used to protect agitators from law enforcement munitions. Law enforcement officials stress that their focus is on those who incite or participate in violence, not on peaceful protestors.
Broader Context: Protests and Federal Response
The protests in Los Angeles erupted after a series of immigration raids in early June 2025. These raids led to widespread demonstrations, which included both peaceful rallies and violent incidents such as assaults on immigration officers, vehicle burnings, and looting. Federal officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and FBI Director Kash Patel, have warned that anyone involved in violence or illegal acts during protests will face prosecution. They have emphasized the government’s commitment to maintaining order and protecting public safety.
Activists’ Perspective: A History of Surveillance and Repression
Immigrant justice advocates and civil rights groups argue that the FBI’s actions are part of a long-standing pattern of federal surveillance and repression of minority and activist communities. They point to the infamous COINTELPRO operations under J. Edgar Hoover, which targeted groups like the Black Panthers and Brown Berets, as evidence that today’s surveillance is not an isolated incident but part of a broader historical trend. Many activists feel that the current investigations are designed to intimidate and silence those who speak out against federal immigration policies.
Organizations Under Scrutiny: Funding and Operations
The FBI’s investigation into protest funding has put organizations like CHIRLA and CARECEN under a microscope. Both groups play a major role in providing legal support, advocacy, and resources to immigrants in Los Angeles. The scrutiny of their funding streams could have serious consequences, potentially affecting their ability to operate and serve their communities. If the investigations find any evidence of illegal activity or foreign influence, these organizations could face loss of funding, legal challenges, or even closure.
Practical Implications for Stakeholders
The ongoing investigations and law enforcement actions have wide-ranging effects on various groups:
- Activists and Organizers: Face criminal charges and increased federal surveillance. This may discourage people from participating in future protests or from organizing at all.
- Organizations: Those receiving government and private funding are under scrutiny, which could impact their operations and ability to secure future funding.
- Protesters: Risk arrest and prosecution, especially if involved in violent acts or curfew violations.
- Community Members: May see reduced support from advocacy organizations if those groups are forced to scale back operations due to legal or financial pressures.
- Policy Makers and Lawmakers: Must balance the need for public safety with the protection of constitutional rights, such as freedom of speech and assembly.
Expert Perspectives: Legal and Academic Views
David Carter, a criminal justice professor, explains that funding protests is not illegal in itself. The FBI’s focus, he says, is on the intent behind the funding—specifically, whether it is used to support illegal activities. Law enforcement officials echo this view, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between peaceful protest and violent acts. They argue that holding individuals accountable for violence is necessary to protect communities and maintain order.
Ongoing Investigations and Future Outlook
The FBI and Department of Justice investigations into protest funding and organizer activities are ongoing. There is potential for further arrests and charges as new evidence comes to light. Congressional inquiries into foreign influence and funding networks may lead to new laws or regulations aimed at increasing transparency and accountability for organizations involved in protest movements.
Activist groups are expected to continue their work advocating for immigrant rights, while also challenging what they see as federal overreach and surveillance. The outcome of these investigations could set a precedent for how similar situations are handled in other cities across the United States 🇺🇸.
Historical Parallels: Lessons from the Past
The current situation in Los Angeles is reminiscent of past federal actions against civil rights and activist groups. The COINTELPRO program, which ran from the 1950s to the 1970s, targeted a wide range of organizations and individuals deemed subversive by the government. Many believe that the tactics used then—surveillance, infiltration, and prosecution—are being repeated today, albeit in a new context.
Centro CSO’s connection to the original Community Service Organization, and its ties to figures like Cesar Chavez and Dolores Huerta, highlight the long-standing relationship between immigrant rights activism and federal scrutiny. According to analysis by VisaVerge.com, this historical context is crucial for understanding why today’s activists are so concerned about the FBI’s actions.
Community Response: Calls for Accountability and Transparency
In response to the recent arrests and investigations, immigrant justice advocates are demanding greater transparency from law enforcement agencies. They are calling for the charges against Alejandro Orellana and others to be dropped, and for an end to what they describe as intimidation tactics. Many community members have rallied in support of the arrested activists, organizing vigils, press conferences, and social media campaigns to raise awareness about the issue.
Potential Changes: New Regulations and Enforcement Actions
The investigations into protest funding could lead to new regulations or enforcement actions targeting financial support for protest activities. Lawmakers may introduce legislation aimed at increasing oversight of organizations that receive government grants or private donations. This could have a chilling effect on advocacy work, as organizations may become more cautious about how they use and report their funds.
What This Means for Immigrants and Advocates
For immigrants and those who support them, the current climate in Los Angeles is one of uncertainty and fear. The risk of arrest, prosecution, and surveillance may deter people from participating in protests or seeking help from advocacy organizations. At the same time, the increased scrutiny of funding sources could limit the resources available to those in need.
Advocates stress the importance of knowing your rights when interacting with law enforcement. They recommend that anyone involved in protests or advocacy work familiarize themselves with legal protections and seek support from trusted organizations. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) provides resources on protest rights and dealing with law enforcement, which can be accessed through their official website.
Actionable Takeaways and Next Steps
- For Activists: Stay informed about your legal rights and seek legal counsel if you are contacted by law enforcement.
- For Organizations: Review funding sources and ensure compliance with all reporting requirements. Be prepared for possible audits or investigations.
- For Protesters: Understand the risks involved in participating in demonstrations, especially if violence or curfew violations are possible.
- For Community Members: Support advocacy organizations through donations, volunteering, or public statements of solidarity.
- For Lawmakers: Consider the impact of new regulations on civil liberties and the ability of communities to organize and advocate for their rights.
Conclusion
The FBI’s actions in Los Angeles have brought national attention to the challenges faced by immigrant justice advocates and the organizations that support them. As investigations continue and the political climate evolves, the balance between public safety and the protection of constitutional rights will remain a central issue. The outcome of these events will shape the future of immigrant rights activism not only in Los Angeles but across the United States 🇺🇸.
For those seeking more information or wishing to contact the FBI regarding these investigations, the FBI Los Angeles Field Office provides official contact details and resources.
By staying informed and engaged, all stakeholders—activists, organizations, lawmakers, and community members—can help ensure that the rights of immigrants and advocates are protected, even in challenging times.
Learn Today
FBI → Federal Bureau of Investigation, US government agency handling domestic intelligence and law enforcement.
Immigrant Justice Organizers → Activists coordinating efforts to defend immigrant rights and support immigrant communities.
CHIRLA → Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles, a nonprofit advocating immigrant rights.
Curfew Violations → Breaking government-imposed time restrictions on movement, often during protests or emergencies.
Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) → US law requiring disclosure of foreign connections by individuals or groups influencing policy.
This Article in a Nutshell
In Los Angeles, FBI actions against immigrant justice organizers sparked alarm. Alejandro Orellana’s arrest and funding probes highlight tensions in activism, raising concerns about civil liberties and government surveillance amidst ongoing investigations and protests.
— By VisaVerge.com