On June 10, 2025, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents carried out a large-scale raid at Glenn Valley Foods in Omaha, Nebraska, detaining about 70 workers. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has now filed legal challenges against ICE, arguing that the agency’s new policy of denying bond eligibility to certain immigrants leads to unfair and prolonged detention. This legal action highlights growing concerns about due process and the rights of immigrants caught up in enforcement actions.
The Omaha ICE raid marks Nebraska’s largest immigration enforcement operation since 2018. Most of those detained had no criminal records, yet they now face long periods in jail while their cases move through the immigration system. The ACLU’s challenge focuses on a recent shift in ICE policy: immigrants who entered the United States 🇺🇸 without permission are now automatically ineligible for bond, even if an immigration judge has decided they are not a flight or safety risk. This change has left dozens of people in Nebraska jails, separated from their families and unable to return to their communities.
Details of the Omaha ICE Raid and Detention Policy
The June 10 operation at Glenn Valley Foods targeted workers suspected of being in the United States 🇺🇸 without legal status. According to local attorneys and advocates, ICE detained about 70 people, most of whom had no prior criminal convictions. The new ICE policy means that even after an immigration judge reviews a person’s case and sets a bond amount, ICE can refuse to release them if they entered the country without authorization.
ICE raid at Glenn Valley Foods in Omaha
Immigration judge sets $10,000 bond for detained man
Man released after 11-day delay
ACLU files national lawsuit against federal government
ACLU files lawsuit on behalf of detained woman
One Omaha man’s experience shows how this policy works in practice. After being detained in the raid, he was held at Lincoln County jail in North Platte. On July 10, an immigration judge ruled that he was not a flight risk or a danger to the community and set a $10,000 bond. His family paid the bond, expecting his release. However, ICE delayed his release for 11 days, only letting him go on July 21 after admitting to an “oversight.” This delay caused unnecessary hardship for the man and his family, raising questions about the fairness of the process.
ACLU’s Legal Challenge and Arguments
The ACLU of Nebraska, led by Executive Director Mindy Rush Chipman, has strongly criticized ICE’s new directive. Rush Chipman calls the policy “cruel” and says it punishes families and communities by keeping people in jail even after a judge has found them eligible for bond. She argues that this approach violates basic rights and reverses a long-standing practice that allowed for release if a person was not considered a danger or likely to flee.
Paul Forney, an Omaha immigration attorney representing several of those detained, says ICE’s actions ignore civil liberties and aim to remove people quickly without giving them a fair chance to defend themselves. “ICE is disregarding the decisions of immigration judges and the rights of the people they detain,” Forney explains. “This isn’t just about one case—it’s about the rights of everyone caught up in these raids.”
On August 1, 2025, the ACLU filed a lawsuit on behalf of a woman detained in the Omaha raid. The suit challenges ICE’s refusal to release her even after a judge set bond, arguing that the agency’s actions violate her constitutional rights. According to analysis by VisaVerge.com, this legal action is part of a broader push to force ICE to respect immigration court decisions and restore bond eligibility for those who qualify.
National Context and Broader Implications
The situation in Omaha is not unique. On July 29, 2025, the ACLU and other advocacy groups filed a national lawsuit against the federal government, seeking class-action status for millions of immigrants affected by the new policy. These groups argue that stripping bond eligibility from people who entered the United States 🇺🇸 without permission, regardless of their individual circumstances, leads to unnecessary and prolonged detention.
The new ICE policy has several practical effects:
- Longer family separations: Detainees remain in jail for weeks or months, unable to return home even after a judge grants bond.
- Loss of income and stability: People held in detention cannot work or support their families, causing financial hardship.
- Legal challenges: Detainees have less access to legal help and resources while in jail, making it harder to fight their cases.
- Bond payments held by the government: Families who pay bond may not see their loved ones released, and tens of thousands of dollars remain with the government due to delays or denials.
The ACLU and other legal advocates argue that this policy violates the U.S. Constitution and established immigration law. They are calling for immediate changes to restore fairness and allow judges’ decisions to stand.
Community Impact and Response
The Omaha ICE raid and the new detention policy have deeply affected local families and communities. Many children are separated from parents, and entire households are left without income or support. Community groups and legal aid organizations have stepped in to provide help, but the need is great.
Advocates urge families affected by ICE detention to:
- Stay informed: Follow updates from trusted sources like the ACLU of Nebraska and local immigrant rights groups.
- Seek legal help: Contact immigration attorneys or legal aid organizations for advice and representation.
- Document everything: Keep records of all communications with ICE, bond payments, and court decisions.
- Reach out for support: Many community groups offer food, housing, and emotional support for families facing detention.
For more information or to request assistance, the ACLU of Nebraska provides updates and resources on their official website. They also offer guidance on how to respond if a loved one is detained in an ICE raid.
Looking Ahead: Legal and Policy Changes
The lawsuits filed by the ACLU and other groups could lead to major changes in how ICE handles bond and detention. If courts rule in favor of the plaintiffs, ICE may have to restore bond eligibility and respect immigration judges’ decisions nationwide. This would allow many detainees to return home while their cases are pending, reducing family separation and financial hardship.
Advocacy groups continue to press for policy changes at the federal level. They encourage the public to contact their elected officials and demand fair treatment for immigrants. As the situation develops, legal experts expect more court decisions and possible changes to ICE’s detention practices.
For official information about immigration detention and bond, readers can visit the U.S. Department of Justice’s Executive Office for Immigration Review at https://www.justice.gov/eoir. This site provides details on immigration court procedures, bond hearings, and detainee rights.
In summary, the ACLU’s challenge to ICE’s new detention policy in Omaha has brought national attention to the issue of prolonged immigrant detention. As legal battles continue, affected families and communities are urged to stay informed, seek help, and advocate for fair treatment under the law.
This Article in a Nutshell
