More than 50 immigration judges have been fired by the Trump administration since January 2025, sparking legal action, public outcry, and deep concern about the future of the immigration court system. As of July 31, 2025, these judges are appealing their dismissals and challenging the Department of Justice (DOJ) under Attorney General Pam Bondi.
The firings include senior leaders, assistant chief immigration judges (ACIJs), and new appointees. Thirteen judges lost their jobs before even being sworn in, and seven ACIJs—about 25% of court leadership—were also removed. Nine members of the Board of Immigration Appeals, all appointed during President Biden’s term, were dismissed as well. This comes at a time when the immigration court backlog has reached a record 3.5 million cases, with only about 600 judges left to handle them.
Fired judges are taking their cases to the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), filing lawsuits, and speaking out publicly. Many claim their dismissals were politically motivated, pointing to gender discrimination and retaliation for decisions not aligned with the Trump administration’s priorities. According to the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, a total of 106 judges have left since January 2025 due to firings, resignations, retirements, or transfers.
Judges were often notified of their termination by email, sometimes during active hearings, causing immediate disruption. The removal of ACIJs has left 18 out of 71 immigration courts without leadership, affecting the supervision of 135 judges and over 400 staff. Courts handling detained dockets, juvenile dockets, and other priority cases have been especially hard hit.
Some judges, like Carla Espinoza in Chicago, were dismissed at the end of their two-year probationary period. Critics argue this is being used to remove judges who do not support the administration’s agenda. The appeals process itself is under scrutiny, as the Trump administration has also targeted the MSPB, raising questions about fairness.
A recent court ruling may help. On June 3, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decided that civil servants, including immigration judges, can seek relief directly in federal court if administrative remedies are unavailable. This could strengthen the fired judges’ legal arguments.
Attorney General Pam Bondi has not given detailed reasons for the firings. Judges like Jennifer Peyton and Carla Espinoza describe their dismissals as abrupt and retaliatory. Senator Dick Durbin called the firings an “abuse of power,” and union president Matt Biggs warned that remaining judges feel threatened and morale is low.
The loss of experienced immigration judges is expected to make the backlog even worse, delaying hearings for millions. Advocacy groups warn that due process is at risk, especially for asylum seekers and children. Many judges now feel pressured to rule in line with administration priorities, fearing they could be next.
For more information on the immigration court system and current updates, visit the official Executive Office for Immigration Review website at justice.gov/eoir. As reported by VisaVerge.com, the outcome of these legal battles could shape the future of judicial independence and due process for immigrants in the United States 🇺🇸.
Learn Today
Immigration Judge → A federal official who decides legal cases involving immigration status and removal proceedings.
Department of Justice (DOJ) → U.S. federal agency overseeing law enforcement, including immigration court administration.
Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) → The highest administrative body for immigration case appeals within the DOJ.
Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) → An independent agency that hears federal employment disputes and protects civil servant rights.
Administrative Remedies → Internal processes a government employee must use before seeking court intervention.
This Article in a Nutshell
The Trump administration fired over 50 immigration judges since January 2025, raising legal challenges amid a backlog of 3.5 million cases, threatening judicial independence and due process for immigrants in the U.S.
— By VisaVerge.com
