Key Takeaways
• Irish government cancels Coolock Factory asylum housing plans due to lengthy delays and local opposition, confirmed May 16, 2025.
• Asylum applications in Ireland have halved in the past year, easing urgent demand for new accommodation centers.
• Local protests, fires, and planning obstacles significantly contributed to the withdrawal of the International Protection Accommodation Service proposal.
The Irish government has called off plans to turn the old Coolock Factory—the former Crown Paints site in north Dublin—into accommodation for asylum seekers through the International Protection Accommodation Service (IPAS). This decision, confirmed on May 16, 2025, marks a big shift after nearly two years of debate, planning, and heated controversy.
What Was Planned for Coolock Factory?
Last summer, the Coolock Factory site was suggested as a possible new IPAS center. IPAS is the government service responsible for finding housing for people who come to Ireland 🇮🇪 to seek asylum, meaning people who ask for protection because they fear for their safety in their own country. The idea was to renovate the large, unused building into living space for these new arrivals while their asylum applications were considered.
Since 2023, a proposal was in the works to develop this site into an accommodation center. The building’s location in a busy part of north Dublin, its size, and its existing structure seemed, at first, to make it a good option. However, things did not go as smoothly as planned.
Why Was the Plan Dropped?
The Department of Justice, which oversees Ireland’s immigration matters, explained in a letter to local politicians that they stopped looking at the Coolock Factory for accommodation due to the “prolonged nature” of getting the plan through all the necessary checks and permits. In simple words, the plan had too many delays and problems during the development and planning stages, making it hard for the government to keep going.
This didn’t come out of the blue. Over several months, there were:
- Many obstacles with planning permissions
- Difficulties arranging the changes needed to meet standards for accommodation
- Strong opposition and serious incidents at the site
The process dragged on for so long that it no longer made sense to continue.
Tensions and Trouble on the Ground
The Coolock Factory became a flashpoint in Ireland’s asylum debate. Worries and anger over housing for asylum seekers in the area led to:
– Repeated protests outside the factory site
– Confrontations between protesters and gardaí (police)
– Several suspicious fires at or near the building
People living nearby voiced strong opinions, arguing that the area did not have enough services or resources for more residents, especially people with special needs such as those fleeing difficult situations. Some protests turned violent, with damage to property and threats to public safety.
These local tensions made it even harder to move the plan forward. Each time the government or its partners tried to take a step ahead, something would happen—whether a new protest, fire, or legal snag—that set things back even more.
How Does the Decision-Making Process Work?
The Department of Justice has to review every possible new accommodation before anything is agreed. They weigh up:
- Whether the building and location are suitable
- How much it will cost and whether it is good value for taxpayers
- If the property can be brought up to the required standard safely
- If there are enough services nearby like schools, shops, and transport
- What the surroundings are like and if they are safe and welcoming
- How residents’ health, welfare, and happiness would be protected
- What’s needed most right now, across the country
All these points mattered for the Coolock Factory as well, but the repeated delays and the problems at the site swung the decision against using it.
Wider Context: Changes in Asylum Applications
The government’s choice to step back from the Coolock Factory site is also linked to changes in the number of people seeking asylum in Ireland. According to recent reports, asylum applications in Ireland have been cut in half over the past 12 months. This drop means there is less urgent pressure to find new large-scale accommodation centers quickly.
As stated in the news source, the government has the space to take a more “pragmatic” approach—meaning they can afford to be a bit more careful and consider each new site more slowly and fully, instead of rushing plans through due to high demand.
Criticism and Calls for Inquiry
Despite the government’s final decision, not everyone is happy with how the Coolock Factory story played out. Local representatives and some community members have criticized what they see as the “chaotic” way the plan was managed from start to finish. Many say there was not enough clear communication, and decisions were made without proper consultation with residents or local leaders.
With the factory plan now shelved, some politicians are asking for a formal inquiry into what went wrong. They want answers on why the site was chosen, who was responsible for different stages of the plan, what mistakes were made, and how tension between authorities and the public could have been handled better.
What Is the International Protection Accommodation Service (IPAS)?
IPAS, part of the Department of Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth, is in charge of providing housing to those seeking international protection. This service gives asylum seekers a safe and secure place to live while their cases are being reviewed. These accommodations range from government-run centers to buildings owned by private entities but managed for state purposes.
When asylum seekers arrive in Ireland, they are usually placed in shared accommodation. The government tries to make sure that these places are safe and that people’s basic needs—like food, a place to sleep, and security—are being met. However, as more people have come in recent years, it has been a challenge to find enough suitable, high-quality places for everyone, especially in bigger cities like Dublin.
The IPAS system has faced a lot of public attention and scrutiny. Some people worry that too many large centers can put strain on local areas, while others say that more and better accommodation is needed quickly to protect the most vulnerable.
If you would like more detailed information about IPAS and its work, you can visit the official Irish government page on International Protection Accommodation for full and current details.
How Did We Get Here? A Brief Look Back
Turning unused or disused buildings—like the Coolock Factory—into temporary housing for asylum seekers is not new in Ireland or elsewhere. As the number of people migrating to Europe increased in the past decade, governments have often tried to use whatever space they have available.
In Ireland 🇮🇪, this has led to many proposals over recent years to open new IPAS centers in towns and cities. Some of these plans have worked and others have not. Every time a new center is suggested, the government must consider both the national need and the feelings of local communities.
The Coolock Factory plan began in earnest in 2023, but within just a few months, tensions had already started rising. Fires, repeat protests, and long waits for planning decisions all added to the sense that the project might never really get off the ground.
What Does the Decision Mean for Asylum Seekers?
The direct impact of this decision is that the Coolock Factory will not open as a living space for those seeking protection. For asylum seekers, especially those waiting for a home in north Dublin, it means they will be placed somewhere else in the IPAS network—possibly in centers that are farther from Dublin or already crowded.
On the other hand, a smaller number of applications might mean that people will not have to wait as long for a suitable place, as the system is less overloaded than before. Still, uncertainty remains for those who arrive and do not know where they will be sent.
What Does It Mean for the Local Community?
Many local people argued that their area was already under pressure from lack of housing, services, and schools. For some, the end of the IPAS plan at the Coolock Factory brings relief and a sense that their voices were heard. For others, especially those who believe in helping newcomers, it is a sad step back and a missed chance to show solidarity.
The wider discussion is not just about one building. It touches on big questions: How can a country welcome people in need without overloading local communities? How do you balance compassion with practical limits? How can government decisions be clearer and more open from start to finish?
Arguments From Both Sides
People opposed to the Coolock Factory plan raised points such as:
- Strain on local amenities like shops, doctors, and public transport
- Safety and security concerns from both sides—locals and new arrivals
- Worries over lack of information from authorities
Supporters argued:
- The need to show compassion and share responsibility for those fleeing hardship
- That using empty buildings could solve two problems at once—lack of housing for asylum seekers, and unused sites in cities
- That with careful planning, communities could benefit, not just cope
What’s Next for Government Policy?
As reported by VisaVerge.com, analysts note that with the recent drop in asylum applications, the government has time to think harder about its approach. The new focus seems to be on moving step by step, checking that every offer—like the Coolock Factory—is actually suitable in the eyes of local people, meets standards, and is value for money.
Calls for an inquiry may lead to a review of how sites are chosen, how local voices are included, and how the authorities manage risk and communication.
Conclusion: A Turning Point in Ireland’s Approach
The end of the Coolock Factory proposal could mark a turning point in how Ireland handles accommodation for asylum seekers. It shows the challenges of finding the right balance—using what space is available, keeping communities on board, and making sure everyone gets a fair say.
The International Protection Accommodation Service will keep playing a central role in this system, and decisions around sites like Coolock will be watched closely in the months ahead. No one solution will satisfy everyone, but after the troubles seen here, a more careful and clear process may be on the horizon for Ireland’s handling of asylum accommodation.
For those seeking more details about the government’s approach or what you can do if you are an asylum seeker, visit the official government page on International Protection Accommodation. This will give you up-to-date and trusted details about your accommodation options and the process involved.
In the coming months, it will be important for the government, local communities, and advocates to keep working together to ensure that every decision about places like the Coolock Factory is fair, open, and works for everyone involved.
Learn Today
International Protection Accommodation Service (IPAS) → A government agency providing housing to asylum seekers in Ireland while their applications are processed.
Asylum seekers → Individuals who apply for protection in another country because they fear persecution in their home country.
Direct Provision → A former Irish system offering basic accommodation and food to asylum seekers while their claims were processed.
Planning permission → Official approval required before changing building use or starting construction, often involving assessments and consultations.
Gardaí → Irish national police force responsible for maintaining public order and safety, particularly during protests or disturbances.
This Article in a Nutshell
Plans to convert Coolock Factory into an IPAS center for asylum seekers have been halted by the Irish government due to persistent resistance, delays, and security concerns. With asylum applications dropping by half, officials now favor a cautious, community-focused approach, sparking debates about balancing compassion, transparency, and community well-being for future projects.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• Clearsprings and partners to return profits from asylum seekers’ hotels
• CGRS Immigration Judge Dashboard offers new view into asylum decisions
• Trump Shuts Down Asylum System on Day One
• Asylum-seekers barred from US-Mexico border as entry points close
• Asylum-seeker accommodation in UK to cost €1.2bn next year
