Key Takeaways
• Tariku Hadgu, an Ethiopian asylum seeker, attacked two female police officers in Bournemouth on April 18, 2025.
• Hadgu received a suspended 16-week sentence, 12-week curfew, bar ban, and must pay £500 compensation from his allowance.
• The Home Office was notified; Hadgu’s conviction may harm his asylum claim and lead to removal from the UK.
A 21-year-old Ethiopian 🇪🇹 asylum seeker named Tariku Hadgu avoided jail after attacking two female police officers in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧. The incident took place in Bournemouth on April 18, 2025. According to court records, police officers responded to a call about a man carrying a knife. Tariku Hadgu matched the description given to them. When the officers found him, he was very drunk. While being questioned, Hadgu assaulted both female police officers, pinning one to the ground and repeatedly hitting her until a member of the public stepped in to help. The police found a small amount of cannabis on him, but no knife was recovered.
Details of the Offense

Tariku Hadgu, who arrived in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 by small boat three years before the incident, was facing serious charges after the attack on the female police officers. Bournemouth became the focal point of this case as the attack highlighted the risks faced by law enforcement, especially female officers, when responding to calls involving potential weapons and intoxicated people. While Tariku Hadgu did not have the reported knife, the violence of the assault shocked those involved.
During the court hearing, it was noted that Hadgu was too drunk to remember what happened. His lawyer said that he was “extremely remorseful” for his actions and that he was trying to improve his life by learning English at college and living with other asylum seekers. Still, this was little comfort to the two police officers assaulted, and the case has sparked debate.
Court Proceedings and Sentencing
The court handed down a sentence that many found controversial. Instead of immediate prison time, Tariku Hadgu received a 16-week prison sentence, but it was “suspended,” meaning he would not go to jail unless he committed another crime within a year. He was also given a 12-week curfew, requiring him to stay at home during certain hours. Additionally, he was banned from entering bars, pubs, or clubs in all of Dorset for one year. On top of these measures, the court ordered Hadgu to pay £250 in compensation to each of the female police officers involved, totaling £500. This compensation is to be taken out of his weekly living allowance, which is money given to asylum seekers for daily necessities.
The judge explained that the decision not to send him straight to jail was based on Hadgu’s young age and “immature brain development”. However, the judge also made it clear that any further offense would result in jail time. The court also ordered that the Home Office, the government department responsible for immigration, be notified about this case because it could have consequences for Hadgu’s asylum status.
Reaction from Law Enforcement
James Dimmack from the Dorset Police Federation spoke out strongly after the sentencing. He said, “It is never acceptable to assault police officers… I am deeply concerned that the punishment does not correspond to the crime.” Many in the police force and the broader public share this concern, especially since the assault involved two female police officers who were simply doing their job. The issue of violence against police, especially female officers, has been a topic of discussion for years, and this case has added new urgency to those conversations. As reported by VisaVerge.com, assaults on police — and especially on female police officers — will often attract public attention and political debate about law enforcement safety and consequences for offenders.
The Immigration Context: Asylum Seekers and the ‘Small Boats’ Issue
Tariku Hadgu’s status as an asylum seeker in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 adds another layer of complexity to the case. Over the past several years, there has been a sharp increase in the number of people arriving in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 on small boats, most commonly across the English Channel. According to the Migration Observatory, about 94% of those arriving by this route between 2018 and 2024 later applied for asylum. Around 70% of these received protection at the first decision stage by the Home Office.
The United Kingdom 🇬🇧 has taken a tougher approach in response, introducing new laws that target people who enter the country without proper permission. Under the new “Stop the Boats” Bill, people who enter the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 in this way can face fast-track removal or other legal consequences, unless sending them away would put them in serious danger in their home country. This law is part of a wider effort to discourage risky small boat crossings and deter people from using unsafe and illegal routes to reach the United Kingdom 🇬🇧. The case of Tariku Hadgu, therefore, sits right at the intersection of immigration policy and criminal justice — raising questions about how offenders should be handled when their immigration status is not yet settled.
Female Police Officers: Protection and Respect
This case also shines a spotlight on the safety of female police officers. Policing is already a challenging and sometimes dangerous job, but female officers often face extra risks, particularly when responding to violent or unpredictable situations. The attack in Bournemouth put attention on how important it is to make sure all police officers, especially female police officers, are safe and treated with respect. Dorset Police and the Federation that represents officers have called for stronger penalties for anyone found guilty of attacking police, saying that strong consequences help send a clear message that assaults on officers will not be tolerated.
Life as an Asylum Seeker: Challenges and Uncertainty
Living as an asylum seeker in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 comes with many challenges and uncertainties. Tariku Hadgu’s situation is, in some ways, typical. He lives with other asylum seekers, has limited income, and is learning English at a local college. Asylum seekers often must wait months or even years for a decision on their status. During this time, they usually aren’t allowed to work and must survive on a basic weekly allowance provided by the government.
Many asylum seekers left difficult or dangerous situations in their home countries, hoping for safety and a new start. However, if they commit a crime while waiting for a decision, it can put their asylum claim at risk. Judges are required to report serious cases to the Home Office, which can then decide whether to allow the person to stay or begin removal proceedings. In some cases, even those found guilty of crimes may not be removed if their home country is too dangerous, but the process always becomes more uncertain and stressful.
In the Bournemouth case, the fact that Tariku Hadgu has now been convicted of assault could make his asylum path more difficult. The Home Office will now review the case to decide whether any extra steps should be taken. It’s important for anyone seeking asylum to understand that criminal convictions can severely impact their future prospects in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧.
What the Public and Police Say
There has been strong reaction to the sentencing of Tariku Hadgu, both from the police community and the public. The Dorset Police Federation made it clear that they believe the punishment did not match the seriousness of the crime. Many members of the public, especially those in Bournemouth and across Dorset, expressed sympathy for the two female police officers who were attacked. They questioned whether a suspended sentence is enough to deter future attacks on police.
Others have pointed out that people like Tariku Hadgu often face mental and emotional challenges when arriving in a new country, especially after dangerous journeys and time spent in uncertain conditions. Some say that support for asylum seekers needs to go hand-in-hand with firm enforcement of the law to ensure both integration and public safety.
Government Response
Under the revised asylum laws, the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 government gives strong warnings to all new arrivals: committing a crime could lead to the denial of asylum and removal from the country. The Home Office now regularly checks court records to identify cases where foreign nationals — including those seeking asylum — have been convicted of crimes. In cases like that of Tariku Hadgu, the Home Office is informed directly by the judge and can then launch its own review. This process is part of a broader effort to send a clear message that lawbreaking, no matter the person’s immigration status, will carry real consequences.
For readers interested in more details about asylum policies and the impact of criminal convictions, the official government information on asylum procedures can be found on the UK Government’s asylum guidance page.
The Issue of Small Boat Arrivals
Tariku Hadgu’s case also comes against the backdrop of ongoing debates about small boat crossings. In recent years, these journeys have become the focus of high-level discussions in Parliament, police strategy meetings, and even international talks. The government has spent money and resources to try to stop these crossings and reduce the risks faced by both migrants and law enforcement. The issue is complex — on one hand, many of those crossing are genuinely in danger and deserve protection; on the other hand, repeated criminal incidents fuel arguments for tighter controls and rapid removal.
According to Migration Observatory research, 94% of small boat arrivals from 2018 to 2024 sought asylum after reaching the United Kingdom 🇬🇧, and about 70% won their cases at the first decision stage. This data shows that most people making these journeys are fleeing real dangers or hardship, but there are still difficult questions about how to handle those who commit crimes while their cases are being reviewed.
Tensions Between Justice and Compassion
The story of Tariku Hadgu in Bournemouth puts a spotlight on the balance that courts and the government must find — between compassion for migrants with difficult backgrounds and the need for strong rules to protect public safety. For the police, especially the two female officers assaulted, the attack is a reminder that violence can happen anywhere and that there must be strong penalties for those who harm law enforcement. For immigration officials, it is a sign that justice and immigration law can be closely connected, with decisions in one area quickly affecting the other.
What Happens Next
Tariku Hadgu will now be under curfew for 12 weeks, will not be able to visit bars or clubs in Dorset for one year, and will have money taken from his allowance to pay the female police officers he assaulted. He will avoid jail if he does not commit any more offenses in the next year. However, his future in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 is now less certain, as the Home Office investigates and decides whether he should stay or face some other action.
Final Thoughts
This case is more than just a story about one person. It raises big questions about asylum policy, the safety of female police officers, public expectations of fairness, and the tough balance between mercy and the need for order. It also reminds all who seek asylum that breaking the law can have far-reaching consequences for their immigration journey and their new life in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧.
For those who want to read more about asylum procedures, government policies, or the latest updates on small boat arrivals, the official Home Office guidance is a useful resource.
As cases like that involving Tariku Hadgu and the female police officers in Bournemouth continue to make headlines, it’s clear that issues around immigration, justice, and police safety will stay at the center of public debate. Policymakers, law enforcement, and communities alike will have to work together to find solutions that are both firm and fair for everyone involved.
Learn Today
Asylum seeker → A person who flees their home country and applies for protection in another country, awaiting a decision on their claim.
Suspended sentence → A prison sentence delayed so the offender avoids jail unless another offense is committed within a set period.
Curfew order → A legal requirement that restricts a person to their home during specified hours as part of a sentence.
Home Office → The UK government department responsible for immigration, security, and law and order, including asylum case decisions.
Small Boats Bill → Recent UK legislation to deter unauthorized migration, especially via small boats, allowing rapid removal and tougher consequences.
This Article in a Nutshell
On April 18, 2025, Ethiopian asylum seeker Tariku Hadgu attacked two female officers in Bournemouth. Despite the violent assault, he received a suspended sentence, not immediate jail time. The case highlights tension between public safety, immigration law, and compassion, with the Home Office now reviewing Hadgu’s eligibility to remain in the UK.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• Beware of Study Abroad Scams: Indian Students Targeted in UK