(UTAH) John Shin, a well-known Utah violinist and former Ballet West musician, was taken into custody by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement on Monday, August 25, 2025, according to his family and supporters. He was picked up in Utah and later transferred to an ICE detention center in Colorado. As of August 29, 2025, his wife and attorney say they have not received direct information from ICE about his precise location or the next steps in his case, leaving his legal future unclear.
Family members said Shin managed to place a brief call to his wife, DaNae, around 2:30 p.m. the day he was arrested. During the call, he told her he was detained and asked her to contact their attorney. Loved ones say the arrest happened on the same day as his wife’s birthday, deepening the shock and emotional toll on the family.

The detention has stirred concern across Utah’s arts community, where Shin is known for his years of performance and mentoring younger musicians.
Personal history and immigration status
Shin moved from South Korea to Utah at age 10 on a K2 visa and built his life in the state. After graduating from the University of Utah and following his father’s death, he received DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) — temporary protection that enables certain undocumented people who came to the U.S. as children to live and work lawfully.
He later married DaNae and, three years ago, filed paperwork to become a U.S. citizen, according to relatives. That naturalization application remains pending, and family members say they were told normal processing times could reach five years.
Arrest, alleged basis, and legal uncertainty
While the exact grounds for the arrest were not immediately clear, recent reporting shared by supporters ties ICE’s action to a 2019 impaired driving charge for which Shin already completed all court-ordered requirements. Despite that resolved case, removal proceedings were initiated.
Advocates argue the situation raises hard questions about how discretion is being used when long-term Utah residents with community ties face old, nonviolent offenses.
How DACA, criminal records, and immigration enforcement interact
Shin’s detention illustrates a policy tension that often affects people with DACA or pending immigration cases.
- DACA does not create a path to citizenship; it grants temporary protection from deportation and work authorization that can be renewed.
- If someone with DACA has any criminal record, even a misdemeanor resolved years earlier, ICE may still place the person in removal proceedings, particularly if the underlying immigration status is unresolved.
Immigration attorneys note that prosecutors still have discretion to pause or close a case when the person shows:
- strong community ties
- evidence of rehabilitation
- family hardship
That discretion can be requested by defense counsel and is weighed by the Department of Homeland Security on a case-by-case basis.
Typical post-arrest process and legal options
After an ICE arrest, people are commonly held pending an initial appearance or bond hearing before an immigration judge. Legal options include:
- Requesting a bond hearing so the person can be released while proceedings continue.
- Asking for prosecutorial discretion to pause or close the case.
- Presenting forms of relief from removal based on family unity, length of residence, community work, and humanitarian factors.
Supporters and defense lawyers often assemble evidence and character statements. Judges frequently review:
- letters from community members
- work history and diplomas
- church or counseling records
- proof of sobriety or rehabilitation
Families and attorneys frequently use the official ICE Detainee Locator to confirm where a person is being held and to track transfers. The tool also provides visiting rules, mail instructions, and facility contact information.
Community response
Friends, relatives, and former colleagues describe Shin as a devoted husband, a steady presence in Utah’s music circles, and a mentor to youth ensembles. Professors and conductors who have worked with him — including Robert Baldwin of the University of Utah — have urged decision-makers to consider his positive impact and commitment to service.
Supporters have taken several organized actions:
- Launched a GoFundMe to cover legal fees.
- Coordinated letter-writing campaigns to the immigration judge.
- Organized daily violin performances at the Utah Capitol to call attention to the detention and request his release on bond.
Advocates say the case has become a rallying point for families with mixed statuses across Utah. The detention’s ripple effects include:
- Musicians canceling rehearsals to support the family
- Children in youth orchestras wondering where their teacher has gone
- Churches and neighborhood groups organizing food, rides, and child care
Expected legal next steps and timelines
Immigration lawyers watching the case expect Shin’s legal team to:
- Request a bond hearing soon.
- Present letters from community members and evidence of rehabilitation.
- Produce documentation of his long residence, marriage, and pending naturalization application.
Possible outcomes:
- If bond is granted, Shin could be released while his removal case continues.
- If bond is denied, lawyers can renew requests for prosecutorial discretion or seek other forms of relief.
Timelines vary widely — some cases move in weeks, others take months depending on court calendars, government opposition, and whether additional evidence is required.
Policy context and questions raised
Federal guidance on ICE priorities has changed over time. At different points, enforcement has focused on:
- people with recent or serious criminal records
- or weighing positive equities such as family ties and community contributions more heavily
Shin’s detention sits at this crossroads. Supporters ask whether a resolved, nonviolent offense should outweigh decades of life in Utah and a pending bid for citizenship. Immigration officials have not commented on the specific reasons for holding him beyond confirming that enforcement can include people with criminal histories, even if the offenses are old or misdemeanors.
As of August 29, 2025, advocates say ICE has not issued a public statement on his case particulars.
How community members can help
Attorneys suggest practical steps for those who want to support Shin:
- Write clear, respectful letters addressed to the immigration judge explaining Shin’s character, community work, family roles, and the hardship his detention causes.
- Provide specific examples: concerts for charity, teaching youth, volunteer hours, or steps taken after the 2019 incident (e.g., counseling or sobriety programs).
- Avoid speculation; stick to first‑hand knowledge, dates, and contact information.
Public attention can matter. Analysis by VisaVerge.com suggests that strong community support and detailed evidence packages sometimes encourage prosecutors to exercise discretion — especially when the person has deep ties, a stable home, and a pending application that shows intent to stay lawfully. Still, outcomes depend on the facts and legal details of each case.
Current status and outlook
For now, Utah’s arts community waits. Daily violin gatherings at the Capitol continue as family and friends monitor possible court dates and prepare for a bond request. The central question remains whether Shin will be released while he fights his case — or whether he will remain in a Colorado detention center as legal motions play out in the months ahead.
This Article in a Nutshell
John Shin, a well-known Utah violinist and former Ballet West musician, was detained by ICE on August 25, 2025 and transferred to a Colorado detention center. Shin arrived from South Korea at age 10 on a K2 visa, later obtained DACA, graduated from the University of Utah, and filed for naturalization three years ago; his application remains pending. Supporters say the detention may be tied to a resolved 2019 impaired driving charge, yet removal proceedings were initiated. The arrest has galvanized Utah’s arts community into fundraising, letter campaigns, and daily Capitol performances. Legal strategies include requesting a bond hearing, seeking prosecutorial discretion, and presenting evidence of rehabilitation, family ties, and community service. Outcomes and timelines vary: bond could secure release, while denial would leave other relief options. As of August 29, 2025 ICE had not publicly detailed the case; advocates continue to press for transparency and support Shin’s legal team in preparing evidence for immigration court.