(IDAHO) — Idaho lawmakers pushed forward a trio of bills that would expand or mandate the use of the federal E-Verify system for new hires during the state’s 2026 legislative session, setting up a debate over compliance burdens, public-contracting risks and enforcement exposure for employers.
Senate Bill 1247, House Bill 584 and House Bill 704 move on parallel tracks with different scopes, timelines and penalty structures, while drawing attention from public contractors, small businesses and workers across the state.
Employers tied to government contracts face the most immediate stakes under the most advanced proposal, while the broader House measures raise the prospect of new verification duties for companies that have never used E-Verify.
Senate Bill 1247, titled the “Idaho E-Verify Act,” advanced through the Idaho Senate on February 19, 2026, and moved to the House, placing public contracting at the center of the Legislature’s E-Verify push.
The Senate State Affairs Committee introduced Senate Bill 1247, which requires state and local government entities and some private employers that contract with them to enroll in E-Verify and verify new hires starting January 1, 2027.
Under the bill, coverage extends to private employers with >150 employees when they hold contracts worth ≥$100,000 with state or local government entities, creating a compliance trigger tied to the size of a workforce and the value of public work.
The enforcement structure relies on civil actions brought by the Idaho Department of Labor Director, with courts empowered to order termination of unauthorized workers as part of the bill’s framework.
Senate Bill 1247 also sets a 1-year statewide probation period and requires quarterly new hire reports, a model that ties ongoing compliance to reporting rather than criminal penalties.
Opposition has formed around the bill’s reliance on the federal system itself, with ACLU of Idaho opposing the measure and citing E-Verify flaws.
The bill has drawn a separate critique from the Idaho Freedom Foundation, which rated it 0 (neutral) and described its penalties as milder than those proposed in House Bill 584, while also raising concerns about federal control and error risks.
A status note attached to Senate Bill 1247 lists it as “Introduced” in a latest update dated January 30, 2026, even as the bill moved through the Senate and into the House on February 19.
House Bill 584, introduced February 4 and referred to the House Business Committee on February 5, takes a broader approach by applying its E-Verify mandate to all employers, including small businesses.
The proposal requires employers to verify legal status within 3 days of hire and to enroll by July 1, though the bill text described in the legislative summary did not specify the year tied to that date.
House Bill 584’s penalty structure drew attention in legislative analysis that characterized it as harsher than Senate Bill 1247, a distinction that could matter for employers weighing the risks of audits, enforcement actions and contracting consequences.
House Bill 704, introduced February 16 and referred to the House Business Committee on February 17, targets Idaho Code by adding requirements to Title 44 for employers to verify the legal employment status of workers.
Taken together, the three measures form a spectrum of approaches: Senate Bill 1247 focuses on state and local public entities and certain private employers tied to public contracting, while House Bill 584 and House Bill 704 move toward wider employer obligations through the House Business Committee.
The E-Verify push also fits into a broader set of immigration enforcement bills moving through the Idaho Legislature this year, after the 2026 session began January 10, 2026, with lawmakers also advancing other proposals including HB 700.
Each of the E-Verify measures incorporates federal verification concepts tied to the federal work-authorization framework, citing 8 U.S.C. §1324a as the underlying federal reference point for the system Idaho lawmakers seek to expand in state law.
Public contractors and employers with multi-site hiring operations face a different planning problem than small firms, as differing compliance start dates, enrollment triggers and enforcement models could reshape how companies staff projects across jurisdictions.
Next steps will hinge on House action, including committee consideration and potential floor votes, while differences between Senate Bill 1247 and the House proposals leave room for amendments that could change timelines, coverage and enforcement before any final text reaches the governor.
Senate Bill 1247 Pushes E-Verify as Idaho Labor Department Weighs Rules
Idaho legislators are debating three bills—SB 1247, HB 584, and HB 704—to expand E-Verify mandates. SB 1247 focuses on government contracts and large employers, while House measures seek a universal mandate for all businesses. The proposals vary in penalty severity and implementation timelines, sparking debate over compliance burdens for small businesses and the reliability of federal verification systems during the 2026 session.
