Key Takeaways
• ICE seeks to deport Saul Valverde-Venegas for minor traffic citations and unlawful presence after 12 years in Buffalo.
• Valverde-Venegas’s only offenses are running a red light and unpaid tolls; no criminal or violent records are reported.
• His case raises questions about deportation priorities, fairness, and the impact on families and immigrant communities nationwide.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is moving to deport Saul Valverde-Venegas, a 48-year-old roofing contractor living in Buffalo, United States 🇺🇸. His only offenses, as far as records show, are several traffic citations from years past. He has been living in the United States 🇺🇸 for nearly 12 years and has made a life in Buffalo with his family, working in construction and staying clear of trouble aside from these minor traffic issues.
This case brings up bigger questions. Why are people with only minor traffic tickets being targeted for deportation? How does the system decide which cases to pursue? And what does this mean for people like Saul Valverde-Venegas, as well as their families and communities?
Who Is Saul Valverde-Venegas?
Saul Valverde-Venegas came to the United States 🇺🇸 in May 2013. According to records shared by ICE, he entered the country “unlawfully.” In September 2013, border patrol agents found him near the Rio Grande Valley in Texas. After that, he was taken into custody but released after about a week and a half. He went through immigration hearings, and in February 2016, a judge in Philadelphia closed his case and did not schedule any more court dates.
This was common at the time. During the Obama administration, immigration courts sometimes closed cases like this. It was a way to let some people stay in the country, even though they did not have legal status. There was no guarantee of legal residency, but the government also was not actively trying to remove them.
Saul eventually settled in Buffalo. He works as a roofing contractor, according to his family. His wife, Paula Diaz, describes him as selfless, hardworking, and a dedicated stepfather. He moved to Buffalo for better work opportunities and higher pay. According to New York court databases, Saul Valverde-Venegas has no history of criminal arrests. A City Hall spokesperson confirmed he has never interacted with the Buffalo Police Department. Other than the traffic citations, his record is clean.
The Traffic Citations in Question
So what are these traffic problems that ICE is now pointing to? Records show that all of Saul Valverde-Venegas’s traffic issues happened in the Orlando area of Florida 🇺🇸. Here is what happened, based on official sources:
- In 2018, he ran a red light once.
- Between 2018 and 2020, he was given four citations for failing to pay highway tolls.
All of these issues were picked up by traffic cameras. There was no police stop, arrest, or confrontation. After Saul Valverde-Venegas failed to pay the tolls, his Florida driver’s license was suspended. However, his wife Paula said he later sorted out the problem by paying the tickets. He now has a valid driver’s license from New York.
These traffic citations are the main basis ICE cites for wanting to deport him.
What Happened with Immigration?
After Saul Valverde-Venegas entered the United States 🇺🇸 and was captured near the border, he was released and had to attend court hearings. These hearings were in Philadelphia. In February 2016, the judge decided to close the case, which happened often back then. The case was closed “administratively,” which means it was put aside, not fully ended. Saul did not receive legal status, but the government was also not taking steps to remove him.
Now, years later, the government has reopened action against him. Last week, ICE agents arrested Saul Valverde-Venegas while he was loading a work truck on Buffalo’s West Side. ICE agents told the press they want to deport him because he was in the country without legal status and because of his traffic citations.
Is This Typical? Examining Deportation Over Traffic Citations
Deporting people for only traffic violations is rare. Usually, ICE focuses on people who have committed more serious crimes or have a history of breaking the law. The case of Saul Valverde-Venegas has made some people ask if the rules are changing or if there is less focus on only deporting those with serious offenses.
The main points ICE has raised against Saul are:
- He entered and stayed in the country without legal permission.
- He has several traffic citations, mainly from toll violations and a red light camera ticket.
Neither of these are violent or criminal offenses in the usual sense. They are civil offenses, not crimes handled by criminal courts. Many people get traffic tickets without being arrested or facing major legal trouble.
This focus on minor infractions as a justification for deportation has sparked debate. Should traffic violations really be enough to separate someone from their family and community, especially when they have otherwise stayed clear of trouble?
Background to Today’s Immigration Situation
To understand this case, it helps to look at recent history. During President Obama’s administration, ICE used “prosecutorial discretion.” This meant ICE focused resources on deporting people who had committed serious crimes, recent border crossers, or those seen as threats to public safety.
At that time, many cases like Saul Valverde-Venegas’s were “administratively closed,” allowing those involved to remain in the country without legal status but without active threat of removal. This was done in tens of thousands of cases.
Later, under the Trump administration, ICE took a harder approach. Fewer cases were closed administratively, and more people were put into removal proceedings even for minor infractions. President Biden campaigned on a promise to focus immigration enforcement again on those who pose real threats, especially those with serious criminal convictions. However, what is happening in Saul’s case seems at odds with this message.
Why Is This Case Causing Concern?
There are a few big reasons why the case of Saul Valverde-Venegas has drawn attention in Buffalo and among immigration advocates:
- Lack of Criminal Record: Saul has no history of violence, criminal activity, or conflict with police, aside from old traffic citations.
- Transparency: Some critics say ICE and the federal government should explain more clearly why someone like Saul, whose record is clean except for minor traffic citations, is being targeted for deportation.
- Family Impact: Saul’s wife and stepchild depend on his income and support. Deporting him could leave them without their main provider.
- Changing Focus: If ICE is going after people with only minor traffic problems, others in similar situations may worry they could be next.
Paula Diaz, Saul’s wife, says he is not a threat to anyone and has always worked hard to take care of his family. She and many in the community see the government’s action as too harsh and not in line with promises to use common sense in immigration enforcement.
How Are Deportation Proceedings Handled?
When someone is arrested by ICE, they are usually put into removal proceedings. This means they must appear before an immigration judge. The judge reviews the case and decides if the person can remain or must leave the United States 🇺🇸. Sometimes, judges can choose to close a case or allow the person to stay for humanitarian reasons, but legal options are often limited if the person has already had a chance at court before.
In Saul Valverde-Venegas’s situation, his case was closed in 2016. With the case now reopened and active deportation proceedings started, his legal options may be slim—especially since previous relief was only a temporary pause, not permission to stay.
For information about immigration court procedures and removal defense, you can visit the official U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review website.
Ripple Effects: How Does This Impact Others?
Cases like Saul Valverde-Venegas’s send a message to other immigrants living in the United States 🇺🇸 without legal status. For those with minor traffic citations—but no history of arrests, violence, or other problems—the thought that ICE could target them causes real worry.
Here are some possible effects:
- Fear and Uncertainty: People may avoid reporting problems or helping police out of fear that any contact with the system could lead to deportation.
- Impact on Work and Community: Workers like Saul Valverde-Venegas do important jobs in construction, food service, health care, and more. Removing them can hurt local businesses and the economy.
- Family Separation: Deporting parents separates families, often leaving children behind.
- Pressure on Local Governments: City officials can face new questions about how to support immigrant communities and work with federal authorities.
Public Response: Questions About Fairness and Focus
This case has fueled ongoing debates over who deserves to be targeted for deportation. Community members raise concerns about fairness, saying people who have only had minor traffic run-ins should not be at risk, especially if they contribute to their community and follow the law otherwise.
Looking at Saul Valverde-Venegas’s case, many people are left wondering: Should traffic citations—issues that tens of thousands of drivers get every year—be enough to separate families and uproot lives? Or should ICE focus its resources elsewhere?
Some critics are calling for more transparency from ICE and the administration. They want to know what standards ICE uses to decide which cases to pursue and whether Saul’s case is an exception or a sign of new policies at play.
Summary and Next Steps
Saul Valverde-Venegas’s story is about more than just one man facing deportation for traffic citations. It highlights deeper questions about immigration enforcement, fairness, and community values. His case shows how small infractions, like running a red light or failing to pay tolls, can have big consequences in the current immigration climate.
The story of Saul Valverde-Venegas is drawing attention not just in Buffalo but across the country. His supporters hope his story will lead to more openness from ICE and a renewed focus on fair and common-sense immigration practices.
For now, Saul remains in legal limbo, facing possible removal from a country where he has lived, worked, and built a family for nearly 12 years. His case underscores the need for clear rules, compassion, and balance as the United States 🇺🇸 continues to shape its immigration policies.
If you or someone you know faces similar challenges, it can help to stay informed about your rights and options. For official information, always check directly with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
As reported by VisaVerge.com, it’s important for all communities to know what rights they have and what steps to take if facing deportation. Transparency and careful review of each case can protect not only individuals like Saul Valverde-Venegas but also help build trust within the wider community.
In closing, the question remains: Will cases based only on issues like traffic citations, without a record of other wrongdoing, continue to be grounds for removal from the United States 🇺🇸? Many are watching closely as Saul Valverde-Venegas’s case moves forward, hoping for answers and, perhaps, a shift toward a fairer system for all.
Learn Today
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) → A federal agency responsible for enforcing immigration laws and removing individuals unlawfully present in the United States.
Administrative Closure → A temporary pause in immigration court proceedings that neither grants legal status nor triggers active removal.
Removal Proceedings → Legal processes before an immigration judge to determine if a non-citizen must leave the United States.
Prosecutorial Discretion → The authority of immigration officials to choose if and how to enforce deportation laws in specific cases.
Civil Offense → A violation such as a traffic ticket, not handled by criminal court, but can affect immigration status.
This Article in a Nutshell
Saul Valverde-Venegas faces deportation by ICE despite nearly 12 years in Buffalo and no criminal record, except minor traffic citations. His situation highlights broader debates about immigration enforcement priorities, family separation, and the risk that non-criminal immigrants may now face removal over minor infractions. Community concerns and legal uncertainty grow.
— By VisaVerge.com
Read more:
• Trump deportations leave deep mark on immigrant communities in the US
• Abdelkader Selmi, German boxing champion, faces deportation risk
• Latinos in US feel greater worry about deportations, new data shows
• Kristi Noem says Kilmar Abrego Garcia would face swift deportation again
• Pakistan deportation leaves Afghan refugees facing uncertain futures
