Poll: 40% of Americans Back Deporting Undocumented Immigrants

Four in ten Americans now back the deportation of undocumented immigrants even when those individuals have no criminal record beyond entering the country without authorization, according to a new YouGov–Economist poll conducted in October 2025. The 40% share reflects a firm, current appetite for tougher enforcement and marks a measurable bloc of voters who prefer removal over any form of legal permission.

The same poll shows 38% favor allowing undocumented immigrants to stay if they meet certain requirements, while 14% support allowing them to remain without conditions; 8% are unsure.

What the poll shows — topline results

• 40% favor deportation of undocumented immigrants regardless of criminal history.
• 38% support allowing them to stay if they meet requirements.
• 14% support allowing them to stay without conditions.
• 8% are unsure.

These topline numbers arrive in a heated political moment, with immigration again at the center of national debate. The survey also reveals a sharp partisan split that shapes public opinion on deportation.

Partisan breakdown

• Among Trump supporters, 67% back blanket deportation.
• Among those aligned with Kamala Harris, 14% back deportation; clear majorities in this group favor either conditional or unconditional permission to remain.
• Independent voters are nearly evenly divided: 41% back deportation and 39% favor conditional stays.

These differences underscore a durable divide in how Americans view immigration enforcement. For many Republican voters and Trump supporters, immediate removals are seen as a direct way to assert control at the border and within the interior. Harris-aligned voters generally prefer rules-based paths — often involving background checks, fines, English or civics standards, and proof of work or family ties — that integrate long-term residents rather than expel them. Independents closely mirror the national tension, splitting between enforcement and conditional permission.

Policy implications and political context

The poll’s topline numbers carry real policy implications:

• A 40% base for deportation — even of people without criminal convictions — could encourage more aggressive enforcement messaging and raids, especially in election cycles.
• The combined 52% who support some form of stay (conditional or unconditional) suggests a majority still leans toward legal pathways, signaling potential room for compromise legislation.

The findings come as the Trump administration continues to emphasize border enforcement and to publicize immigration arrest and deportation statistics. Enforcement-first platforms typically focus on:

• high-volume removals,
• expanded detention, and
• quick processing.

Supporters say these steps deter future unlawful crossings and uphold immigration law visibly. Critics counter that aggressive enforcement can sweep up people with deep U.S. ties — including parents of U.S.-born children, long-time workers, and community leaders — without addressing legal routes that might reduce future unauthorized entries.

Other recent national surveys (Quinnipiac, Pew, and Gallup) have reported that most Americans continue to support pathways to legal status for long-settled undocumented immigrants. But the YouGov–Economist results indicate the share favoring mass deportation remains substantial and has risen among Republicans in recent years. Analysis by VisaVerge.com suggests this divergence has widened the political space between enforcement-first policies and proposals focused on conditional legalization tied to work histories, background checks, and fees.

The public’s split views echo long-standing trade-offs facing policymakers: a strong enforcement push can satisfy voters who prioritize rule of law and border control, while the majority favoring stays signals many Americans want clearer rules that balance accountability with stability for families and employers.

Human and economic stakes

The poll’s numbers are not just political abstractions — they reflect daily realities for families, employers, and communities:

• A father working two jobs while raising U.S.-born children may fear being separated from his family after a raid.
• Small business owners in agriculture or hospitality worry that removals will deepen worker shortages.
• DACA recipients with no criminal record may fear that long-settled parents could be targeted despite clean histories.

The 38% who back conditional stays may be open to measures that combine enforcement with earned status — for example, background checks, tax compliance, and sustained employment — although the poll does not specify particular requirements. The 14% supporting unconditional stays represent a smaller but steady bloc favoring broad permission to remain without additional hurdles. The 8% who are unsure indicate a segment of the public that could still shift based on events, messaging, or legislative proposals.

Legal and enforcement context

For voters weighing deportation against conditional stays, basic legal context frames the stakes. Interior immigration enforcement is led by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Its Enforcement and Removal Operations unit handles arrests, detention, and removals. Readers can review official enforcement information on ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations page.

While the poll does not address specific enforcement tools, real-world application can include home or workplace arrests and fast-tracked removals, which often raise due process concerns from advocates.

How campaigns and lawmakers may respond

Campaigns are likely to interpret the 40% deportation support differently:

1. Supporters of President Trump may see a mandate for tougher action and emphasize removals as evidence of results.
2. Allies of Kamala Harris may highlight the combined majority favoring stays to argue for a legislative deal setting standards and bringing long-settled residents into the system.
3. Both sides will target independents carefully, because their near-even split and the 8% unsure present opportunities to move the center.

Past cycles show immigration debates can shift quickly after major events — surges at the border, high-profile cases, or court rulings — even if only temporarily. The October 2025 numbers, however, reveal relatively stable blocs: a large group favors immediate deportations; an even larger group prefers some path to stay; and a small fraction remains undecided. That mix will shape national conversations about enforcement bills, legalization plans, or executive actions in the months ahead.

Key takeaways

• Immigration remains both a policy puzzle and a personal crossroads for millions across the country.
• The poll highlights a stark partisan split that will constrain and shape political messaging.
• Choices about deportation versus conditional legalization will have direct effects on neighborhoods, workplaces, schools, and families long after campaign rhetoric subsides.