NYPD Hands Palestinian Protester’s File to ICE

Key Takeaways

• NYPD shared Leqaa Kordia’s personal records with ICE after her protest arrest, raising concerns over sanctuary law compliance.
• Kordia was detained by ICE, citing an expired visa and alleged protest activity, despite her original arrest being dismissed.
• Legal experts question NYPD’s justification; the case intensifies debate on local-federal cooperation and immigrant rights in New York.

In spring 2024, an incident involving the New York Police Department (NYPD), a Palestinian protester, and federal immigration authorities has sparked strong reactions and deep discussions across legal and immigrant communities. The case centers around Leqaa Kordia, a Palestinian woman who, after being arrested during a protest outside Columbia University, found her personal records shared by the NYPD with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). This information is now being used as evidence in deportation proceedings under the Trump administration. The episode has raised questions about the city’s sanctuary laws, immigrants’ rights, and the risks noncitizen protesters may face.

How the Incident Unfolded

Kordia was one of many individuals taking part in a protest near Columbia University in spring 2024. The protest, described as pro-Palestinian, led to her arrest on charges of disorderly conduct. However, this charge was quickly dismissed in court, and her case was sealed. That should have been the end of the matter under New York City’s sanctuary laws.

But the story took a very different turn. According to reports, including those gathered by VisaVerge.com, the NYPD prepared a four-page report detailing Kordia’s home address, date of birth, and the police account of her protest arrest. Unusually, this internal report was then sent directly to federal agents working within ICE—specifically, the Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) branch. It was this act of information-sharing that changed Kordia’s future and now shapes a heated policy debate.

What Was Shared, and Why Is It Important?

The NYPD’s report included personal data not only about how and where Kordia was arrested, but private details like her address and date of birth. Such information, in most cases, would be shielded from immigration authorities by New York City law. The city’s so-called “sanctuary policies” intend to keep local police from helping in federal immigration matters, especially when those matters involve civil, not criminal, cases.

Yet the NYPD has claimed it acted in response to an official request for information “related to a criminal investigation.” Because the arrest charge of disorderly conduct was later dropped and sealed, lawyers and civil rights experts are raising doubts about whether this sharing followed either the letter or the spirit of city law.

• The NYPD compiled and sent a four-page report to ICE and HSI after Kordia’s March 2024 arrest.
• The data shared included her home address and personal information.
• The charge that led to her arrest—disorderly conduct—was dismissed and sealed.

What Happened to Kordia After the Information Sharing

Months after the arrest, on March 13, 2025, Leqaa Kordia went to what was described as a “voluntary check-in” with immigration authorities in Newark, New Jersey. Such check-ins are common for people with ongoing immigration cases. But this one did not go as expected. Kordia was detained on the spot by ICE agents and then taken to an immigration detention center in Texas.

Why was she detained? Federal officials pointed to her visa overstay, meaning she was present in the United States beyond what her visa allowed. But they also cited her “alleged role in pro-Hamas protests,” which made some wonder whether her political activity was a key factor in how her case was handled.

What remains unclear is how immigration authorities first found out about her protest arrest, since the original charge had been thrown out and police records were sealed. The evidence points back to the NYPD’s special sharing of her information with ICE.

Questions About New York City Sanctuary Policy

This case raises tough questions about whether New York City’s sanctuary laws—passed to protect undocumented immigrants and others from being reported to ICE solely on civil immigration issues—are truly being followed. By law, local police are usually not allowed to share arrest records or personal information with federal immigration agents unless the case involves a serious crime.

• New York City’s sanctuary city policies block most local-federal police cooperation when the issue is just about immigration paperwork or visa rules, not crimes.
• The NYPD insists its response came due to a criminal investigation, but since the charge did not result in a criminal conviction, legal experts dispute that point.

Meghna Philip, a lawyer with the Legal Aid Society, stated that “the intention of the sanctuary laws is to protect against this kind of collusion and pretextual information sharing.” This means the laws were made to stop the kind of cooperation that happened in Kordia’s case and to prevent local police from partnering with ICE on noncriminal matters.

Concerns for Protesters and Immigrant Communities

Kordia’s case is at the center of a much larger discussion about what can happen to noncitizens who decide to speak out, especially on political or controversial topics. If information about minor arrests—especially those later dismissed—can be handed to ICE and used in deportation cases, many people may become too frightened to join protests at all. This is especially worrying for those from communities already under extra attention, such as Palestinians or other Middle Eastern groups.

Civil rights groups warn that if protest-related arrests, even for dropped charges, can trigger immigration action, then immigrants may stop taking part in peaceful assembly or lawful demonstrations. This could limit free speech in the United States 🇺🇸—one of the foundations of its democracy.

Broader Tensions Between Local and Federal Authorities

What happened to Leqaa Kordia fits into a bigger picture playing out in cities across the country. Many major U.S. cities have sanctuary laws that are meant to create a clear line between local police and federal immigration work. These policies aim to build trust between police and immigrant communities so that people are not afraid to report crimes or seek help when needed.

But federal agencies, especially under the Trump administration, sometimes try to push for local help, mainly in cases seen as touching on national security or high-profile protests. When local and federal approaches clash, people like Kordia can find themselves in the middle.

• As reported by VisaVerge.com, similar disputes have happened before, but this case is especially stark because the protest arrest leading to Kordia’s ICE detention involved charges that were dismissed, not criminal convictions.

Legal and Policy Challenges

Legal specialists describe the NYPD’s actions as deeply unsettling. The fact that a sealed, dismissed protest charge could prompt sharing of private data and then become central to a deportation case is, to many, exactly what sanctuary policies were written to avoid.

In Kordia’s case, two main issues are being debated:

1. Was the NYPD allowed to share this information?
   • If they did so strictly because of a real criminal investigation, they may argue it fits an exception in the sanctuary rules. But since the charge was dropped, experts say this explanation is thin.
2. What should happen next to protect others?
   • Advocates call for tighter enforcement of the city’s policies and ask for more clear rules to stop similar information sharing in the future.

Why This Case Matters to Immigrants and Others

For immigrants, especially those whose immigration status is not secure, the Kordia case is a warning sign. It tells them that even an arrest for a minor incident, if reported to ICE, could have immediate and life-changing results. And if this arrest was for lawful protest, the message can be even more frightening.

• Many fear the possibility of a “chilling effect”—that is, scaring people so much that they stop attending rallies, marches, meetings, or even reporting crimes.
• Such fear can isolate immigrant communities and make them less safe.

The Response from the NYPD and Federal Authorities

Both local and federal authorities have provided their own statements. The NYPD claims it responded to a legitimate criminal inquiry from HSI, stressing that its officials followed city and state law and only shared the report in that context. ICE, for its part, refers to its power to enforce immigration law, especially when someone has overstayed their visa.

However, the overlap between a dismissed protest charge and immigration enforcement highlights the fine line between criminal and civil matters. In Kordia’s case, most of the details cited as reasons for her detention—her expired visa and presence at the protest—do not involve criminal convictions.

Potential Impacts for the Future

Civil rights groups, lawyers, and immigrant advocates are all watching closely to see what comes next. Will the city clarify its sanctuary laws? Will there be changes to how local police handle information-sharing with ICE, especially involving nonviolent protesters?

Policymakers may now face pressure to:

• Review how often police share internal arrest records with ICE, especially involving dismissed cases.
• Create stricter limits or clearer guidelines for city officers in similar situations.
• Increase transparency, so the public knows when and why such information is shared.

For the wider public, keeping up with cases like this helps put a spotlight on how much immigrants’ rights are protected—or not—by local policies.

Summary Table: Key Facts

What You Can Do Next

If you’re an immigrant, know your rights and track local sanctuary policies closely. If you’re a noncitizen thinking of joining a protest or demonstration, consider talking to a lawyer about what may happen if you’re arrested, even if the charge is minor or later dismissed. For those interested in finding out more about federal immigration enforcement, the official ICE website provides updates and contact information.

Citizens and city residents can ask local officials how police are following sanctuary rules and request more oversight to keep city and federal roles separate.

Legal experts will likely keep following the outcome of Leqaa Kordia’s deportation case, as well as any city reforms that may grow from it. Whether new rules are made or not, her story is already shaping debates about protest, immigration, and police power.

Conclusion

The sharing of a Palestinian protester’s internal records by the NYPD with ICE has brought to light a tough reality for noncitizen protesters and the immigrant communities of New York City. Even with strong sanctuary laws in place, there remains a risk that local police cooperation with federal immigration enforcement could happen—especially in high-profile, sensitive cases. The line between criminal matters and civil immigration issues is thin and sometimes blurry, and cases like Kordia’s show how quickly someone’s rights and future can shift. As local, state, and federal authorities weigh their next steps, the outcome for Kordia and many other immigrants hangs in the balance.

Learn Today

Sanctuary Laws → Local policies preventing police from cooperating with federal immigration authorities, especially in noncriminal cases involving undocumented immigrants.
ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) → A federal agency responsible for enforcing U.S. immigration laws and carrying out deportations.
HSI (Homeland Security Investigations) → A division of ICE focused on investigating criminal threats related to immigration, customs, and national security.
Visa Overstay → When an individual remains in the United States beyond the period authorized by their visa.
Sealed Records → Court documents hidden from public view, often after charges are dropped or dismissed, preventing their legal use.

This Article in a Nutshell

A Palestinian protester’s arrest near Columbia led NYPD to share her data with ICE, sparking legal and immigrant outcry. Despite New York sanctuary laws, Kordia was detained, exposing vulnerable noncitizens to harsh consequences for minor arrests. Her ongoing deportation fight highlights complex clashes between local and federal authorities.
— By VisaVerge.com

Read more:

• Three Die in ICE Custody in April 2025
• REAL ID not required for standard driver’s license in most states
• TSA ‘Mystery Device’ at Airport Checkpoints Sparks Alarm
• House Republicans Block Ban on ICE Detaining Americans
• University of Minnesota student wins deportation case against ICE