(CROWBOROUGH, EAST SUSSEX, UNITED KINGDOM) Asylum seekers will not be moved into the East Sussex barracks at Crowborough Army Camp in the new year after the Home Office told Wealden District Council that it will not decide whether to house 540 people there until 2026. The assurance, confirmed in writing to the council, calmed fears that men leaving the closing Napier Barracks would be sent to Crowborough within days.
Napier, a former military site in Kent used as a large-scale asylum hostel, shut on December 19, 2025, and the Home Office said no one would transfer from that site to Crowborough. Local leaders say the pause buys time, but not peace. Residents have watched similar sites become flashpoints, and they want clear answers about security, health care, and funding now.

Council action and Home Office response
Council leader Councillor James Partridge and deputy leader Councillor Rachel Millward wrote to Border Security and Asylum Minister Alex Norris MP on December 11, 2025, asking him to hold back any decision until after January 5, 2026. They said rumours of arrivals over Christmas had already strained local services and sparked angry public meetings.
The councillors warned that Sussex Police and NHS teams would face extra calls at the busiest time of year, and that staff would struggle to plan without firm information from London. The Home Office reply, described by council sources as direct, said ministers would not set a start date in 2025 and would not move anyone to Crowborough in early 2026. A spokesperson added that the project remained under review.
Ongoing tensions and council objections
That message did not end the row. Wealden District Council has kept its formal objection to using the Crowborough Army Camp site as non-detained accommodation, saying the plan has fueled misinformation and fear across the town and nearby villages.
- The council met Minister Norris on November 25, 2025, and afterwards said he apologised for what councillors called poor communication from the Home Office.
- No transcript of the meeting was released, so residents still rely on brief statements and social media posts that often conflict.
- Partridge has reported personal threats linked to the debate, highlighting that asylum policy can turn local leaders into targets.
- Millward said the council wants “straight facts” before anyone is housed.
Police have not confirmed details but councillors said tensions remain.
“Straight facts” — the council says it wants written guarantees before any housing begins.
Who would be housed and how they would be managed
Under the outline shared with the council, the East Sussex barracks would be used for single adult male asylum seekers whose claims are still pending. They would not be detained, meaning they could leave the site during the day and return, but they would have to follow rules set by the Home Office contractor.
- Officials told councillors people who did not comply could lose their bed space, though the council said it was not given clear detail about any sanction beyond a review for simply missing a roll call.
- Immigration lawyers note that loss of accommodation can leave an asylum seeker homeless while they wait for an interview and a decision.
- VisaVerge.com reports that moves can break contact with lawyers and the Home Office.
Napier Barracks closure and wider policy context
Napier Barracks, which the Home Office used to house asylum seekers in dormitory-style blocks, has long been criticised by campaigners and some MPs. Its closure on December 19, 2025 has forced officials to find other temporary beds.
- The Home Office has said the Napier site will be redeveloped for housing by March 2026, part of a wider shift away from large military bases as emergency shelters.
- Council papers compare the Crowborough proposal with work at Cameron Barracks in Inverness, where local officials have been told to plan for around 900 asylum seekers in total.
- Ministers argue that using existing buildings cuts costs, while councils say it shifts pressure to clinics and policing.
Local concerns: services, safety and misinformation
In Crowborough, residents have asked:
- Whether the site would bring more patrols
- What medical support would be on hand
- How many people might arrive at once if ministers approve the plan later in 2026
Some locals worry about safety; others say the anger is driven by false claims shared online. Council officers say they have spent weeks correcting rumours that:
- Families or children would be placed in the camp (the proposal is for single adult males)
- People would be released without any checks
Asylum seekers in the UK are screened and their cases are registered when they claim asylum, but many then wait months for interviews while living on basic support. The council says it wants the Home Office to fund extra translation and counselling locally.
Practical questions for local services
The Home Office has not published a final operating plan for Crowborough, but it has pointed residents to existing rules on support for people seeking asylum and where to find guidance.
- Government guidance on asylum support is available at: https://www.gov.uk/asylum-support
Common operational questions for councils when barracks-style housing is used include:
- Who pays for GP visits
- Who funds emergency transport
- Who covers waste collection
- How to manage reporting appointments and legal meeting travel so missed buses do not lead to loss of accommodation
Sussex Police and NHS managers have told the council they need advance notice to adjust staffing, and local charities say they need time to set up English classes and arrange donations.
Current status and next steps
For now, the Home Office position leaves Crowborough in limbo. Council leaders say they will keep pressing for written guarantees on:
- Numbers
- Funding
- Duration of any stay
They also want a clear plan for how people will travel to reporting appointments and legal meetings to prevent administrative penalties from missed transport. The Home Office has not said what will replace beds lost at Napier Barracks, beyond confirming that no one will be transferred from that closed site to Crowborough Army Camp.
With the decision delayed until 2026:
- Residents are urging local MPs to visit
- Refugee charities ask for calm
- Refugee charities note that long waits for asylum decisions already strain people’s lives
Timeline (key dates and figures)
| Date / Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| November 25, 2025 | Meeting between Wealden District Council and Minister Alex Norris |
| December 11, 2025 | Council leaders wrote asking for decision delay until after January 5, 2026 |
| December 19, 2025 | Napier Barracks closed |
| By March 2026 | Home Office says Napier site to be redeveloped for housing |
| 2026 | Home Office will not decide on housing 540 people at Crowborough until this year |
| Other figure | Cameron Barracks planning referenced for around 900 asylum seekers |
If you would like, I can convert the timeline into a printable factsheet or produce a short summary suitable for a community bulletin.
The Home Office has postponed plans to house 540 asylum seekers at Crowborough Army Camp until at least 2026. This follows the closure of Napier Barracks and significant pushback from Wealden District Council regarding impacts on local healthcare and policing. While the site remains under review for single adult males, no immediate transfers will take place, and local authorities are seeking clarity on long-term funding arrangements.
