Maryland Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Deportations

Key Takeaways

• On May 22, 2025, Judge Russell barred deportations in Maryland contested by habeas corpus for two business days.
• Trump administration faces court delays amid rapid deportations and use of Alien Enemies Act.
• The order protects immigrants’ due process rights by allowing court review before deportation execution.

On May 22, 2025, a major development in U.S. immigration law unfolded in Maryland. Chief Judge George L. Russell III of the U.S. District Court for Maryland issued a standing order that directly challenges the Trump administration’s approach to deportations. This order attempts to bar the Trump administration from carrying out any deportations contested under habeas corpus petitions filed in Maryland, at least for two business days after the petition is filed. The move is designed to protect the rights of immigrants and ensure the courts have a chance to review each case before someone is removed from the United States 🇺🇸.

This decision is not just about one person or one case. It applies to all future deportations in Maryland that are challenged through habeas corpus—a legal process that allows people to ask a court to review the lawfulness of their detention or deportation. The order comes amid growing tension between federal judges and the Trump administration over the speed and scope of deportations, especially those using fast-track procedures and old laws like the Alien Enemies Act.

Below, we break down what this order means, why it matters, and how it could affect immigrants, the government, and the broader legal landscape.

What Did the Maryland Judge Decide?

Who: Chief Judge George L. Russell III, an Obama appointee
What: Issued a standing order barring the Trump administration from deporting anyone in Maryland who files a habeas corpus petition, for at least two business days
When: May 22, 2025
Where: U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
Why: To preserve the court’s ability to review deportation cases and protect due process rights
How: By requiring a pause on deportations after a habeas petition is filed, giving the court time to review the case

Key Point: The order is not tied to a single case. It applies to all future cases where someone in Maryland challenges their deportation through a habeas corpus petition.

Why Is Habeas Corpus Important in Deportation Cases?

Habeas corpus is a centuries-old legal principle that protects people from being detained or removed from a country without a fair chance to challenge the government’s actions. In the U.S., it is considered a fundamental right under the Constitution. When someone files a habeas corpus petition, they are asking a federal court to review whether their detention or planned deportation is lawful.

In simple terms:
– If you are facing deportation and believe it is unfair or unlawful, you can file a habeas corpus petition in federal court.
– The court then has the power to pause your deportation and review your case.
– This process ensures that the government cannot remove you without at least some level of judicial oversight.

Judge Russell’s order ensures that people in Maryland have at least two business days after filing a habeas petition before they can be deported. This window is critical for:
– Allowing time for legal counsel to get involved
– Giving the court a chance to review the facts and arguments
– Preventing the government from deporting someone before the court can act

The Trump Administration’s Approach to Deportations

Since returning to office, the Trump administration has made rapid deportations a top priority. Several policy changes have fueled this push:

• Nationwide expansion of expedited removal: This allows immigration officers to deport undocumented individuals caught anywhere in the United States 🇺🇸 if they cannot prove they have lived in the country for at least two years. These cases skip the usual immigration court hearings.
• Use of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798: This old law is now being used to justify mass deportations, especially for groups labeled as security threats. However, courts have questioned whether this law can be used in this way.
• Setting high deportation targets: The administration’s goal is to deport one million immigrants each year, more than three times the previous record. ICE daily arrest quotas have been set at 1,200 to 1,500 people.

Statistics:
– As of April 2025, the administration claims about 140,000 people have been deported this year, though independent estimates suggest the real number may be lower.
– The number of people in ICE custody rose from 41,000 at the start of 2025 to over 46,000 by mid-March.

According to analysis by VisaVerge.com, these aggressive policies have led to a surge in legal challenges and court orders aimed at slowing or stopping deportations, especially when due process rights are at risk.

How Does Judge Russell’s Order Work?

Here’s a step-by-step look at what happens under the new order:

1. Filing: An individual facing deportation files a habeas corpus petition in the U.S. District Court for Maryland.
2. Automatic Pause: As soon as the petition is filed, the federal government is barred from executing the deportation for at least two business days.
3. Court Review: During this pause, the court reviews its authority to hear the case and considers the merits of the petition.
4. Legal Counsel: The individual is guaranteed access to a lawyer and can participate in court proceedings.
5. Government Response: The government must submit its arguments and defend its actions.
6. Further Action: The court can extend the pause or issue additional orders based on the specifics of the case.

This process is designed to prevent “midnight deportations”—cases where someone is removed from the country before a judge can review their situation.

Why Did the Judge Issue This Order?

Judge Russell explained that the order is necessary to preserve the court’s jurisdiction—its power to decide cases—and to ensure that people facing deportation have a real chance to challenge the government’s actions. He cited the need for due process, a constitutional guarantee that the government must follow fair procedures before taking away someone’s liberty or property.

Other federal judges in Maryland, such as Paula Xinis and Stephanie Gallagher, have issued similar orders in recent months. Judges in Massachusetts, Texas, and Washington D.C. have also paused or reversed deportations, often pointing to the same due process concerns.

The Trump Administration’s Response

Officials in the Trump administration have strongly opposed these judicial orders. They argue that:

• Courts lack jurisdiction: The administration claims that the Immigration and Nationality Act and later amendments limit the ability of federal courts to review many immigration cases.
• Public safety concerns: Officials say that blocking deportations undermines efforts to remove people labeled as criminals or gang members.
• “Activist judges”: The administration has accused judges of overstepping their authority and interfering with immigration enforcement.

Tom Homan, the Trump administration’s border czar, has stated that if deported individuals are returned to the U.S. by court order, they will simply be detained and deported again.

Real-World Examples: The Abrego-Garcia Case

One high-profile case that highlights these tensions is that of Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Judge Paula Xinis ordered the Trump administration to return Abrego Garcia to the United States 🇺🇸 after he was deported despite a pending court order. The administration refused, prompting the judge to accuse officials of acting in “bad faith” and obstructing the court’s authority.

Another Maryland judge, Stephanie Gallagher, ordered the return of a different deported individual, again citing wrongful removal. In Massachusetts, Judge Brian Murphy threatened the administration with criminal contempt for failing to comply with court orders.

These cases show the ongoing struggle between the courts and the executive branch over who has the final say in deportation matters.

What Does This Mean for Immigrants?

For people facing deportation in Maryland, Judge Russell’s order provides a critical safeguard:

• Time to get legal help: The two-day pause gives individuals a chance to contact a lawyer and prepare their case.
• Access to the courts: Immigrants can have their cases reviewed by a federal judge before being removed from the country.
• Protection against wrongful deportation: The order helps prevent situations where someone is deported before a court can decide if the removal is lawful.

For families and communities, this order can mean the difference between being separated without warning and having a fair opportunity to fight a deportation order.

Broader Legal and Political Implications

This situation is part of a much larger debate about the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches in U.S. immigration policy.

• For the courts: The order underscores the judiciary’s role in protecting constitutional rights, even for noncitizens. Judges warn that weakening due process in immigration cases could set dangerous precedents for everyone, including U.S. citizens.
• For the Trump administration: The order is seen as a major obstacle to its goal of speeding up deportations and limiting court involvement.
• For advocacy groups: Organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) have praised the order, warning that mass deportations and the use of military or local police for immigration enforcement threaten civil rights and community trust.

Historical Context: How Did We Get Here?

Federal courts have long played a key role in reviewing deportation orders and protecting habeas corpus rights. However, changes to the law in 1996 and 2005 have made it harder for courts to review many immigration cases. The Trump administration’s recent policies have pushed these limits even further, leading to a wave of lawsuits and court orders.

The current legal battles reflect a broader struggle over who controls immigration policy—the president or the courts—and how much protection immigrants should have under the law.

What Happens Next?

The Trump administration is expected to appeal Judge Russell’s order and similar rulings in other states. The legal fight could eventually reach the Supreme Court, which may have to decide how far habeas corpus protections extend in deportation cases and whether the executive branch can bypass judicial review using laws like the Alien Enemies Act.

In the meantime, the courts and the administration are likely to continue clashing over the pace and process of deportations.

Practical Guidance for Those Affected

If you or someone you know is facing deportation in Maryland:

• File a habeas corpus petition as soon as possible if you believe your removal is unlawful. You can find information on how to file on the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland website.
• Contact a qualified immigration attorney or legal aid organization for help. Many groups offer free or low-cost assistance.
• Keep copies of all documents related to your case and any court orders.
• Know your rights: Even if you are not a U.S. citizen, you have the right to due process and legal representation.

For more information on immigration enforcement and your rights, visit the U.S. Department of Homeland Security or consult resources from the ACLU and local legal aid organizations.

Summary Table: Key Judicial Orders vs. Trump Administration Deportation Policies

Takeaways and Next Steps

• Judge Russell’s order is a significant check on the Trump administration’s deportation policies in Maryland.
• Habeas corpus remains a vital tool for immigrants to challenge removal and protect their rights.
• Legal battles over deportation procedures and executive authority are likely to continue, with possible Supreme Court involvement.
• Individuals facing deportation should act quickly to seek legal help and file appropriate petitions.

For the latest updates and detailed guidance, always refer to official government sources and trusted legal organizations. The situation is evolving, and staying informed is the best way to protect your rights and those of your loved ones.

Learn Today

Habeas Corpus → A legal petition allowing individuals to challenge unlawful detention or deportation in court.
Expedited Removal → A process enabling quick deportation of undocumented individuals without formal court hearings.
Alien Enemies Act → A 1798 law used controversially to justify mass deportations of certain groups.
Due Process → A constitutional right ensuring fair legal procedures before deprivation of liberty or property.
Standing Order → A court directive applying uniformly to future cases meeting certain criteria.

This Article in a Nutshell

Judge Russell issued a critical order protecting immigrants in Maryland by pausing deportations after habeas corpus petitions. This ensures fair court review and legal access amidst Trump’s aggressive deportation policies, marking a significant shift in immigration enforcement and judicial oversight in 2025.
— By VisaVerge.com

Read more:

• Artemis Ghasemzadeh Bill Targets Fast-Track Deportations
• Visa temples draw Indians seeking help despite U.S. deportations
• Manatee County Man Sentenced After Triple Deportations
• Supreme Court blocks mass deportations under Alien Enemies Act after AARP lawsuit
• Williamsburg protesters rally against deportations at candlelight vigil