ICE Detainer Lodged for Suspect in Long Island TJ Maxx Molestation

(LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK) Immigration authorities have lodged an arrest detainer against 32-year-old Jimmy Harry Velasquez Gomez after police charged him with inappropriately touching multiple young girls inside a crowded T.J. Maxx store on Long Island, an incident police publicly reported on November 1, 2025. The case, which involves allegations of sexual contact with three children in a popular discount retailer, has quickly become a flashpoint in the already tense debate over immigration enforcement and public safety in suburban communities outside New York City.

What an ICE detainer means in this case

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) confirmed that it issued the detainer request after local officers arrested Velasquez Gomez on the state criminal charges. An ICE detainer is a formal notice asking a local jail or police department to hold a person for up to 48 hours after they would otherwise be released, so federal agents can take custody for possible removal from the United States 🇺🇸. In this case, the detainer signals that ICE considers the suspect both a criminal defendant and a priority for immigration enforcement once the local case moves forward.

According to ICE’s public guidance, posted on its official website for immigration detainers, local agencies that receive such a request are asked to notify federal officers before release and to provide basic biographical and arrest information. The agency says detainers are issued only when there is probable cause that the person is removable under federal law — a standard that can include:

• past deportation orders
• visa overstays
• unlawful entry

That guidance, available through U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, forms the legal backdrop to the step taken in the case of Jimmy Harry Velasquez Gomez after the T.J. Maxx incident.

Limited facts released by police

Police have released only limited information about what happened inside the store. They say the charges involve inappropriate touching of three children while families shopped at the Long Island T.J. Maxx.

• The alleged victims are all girls.
• Their ages and identities have not been disclosed because they are minors.
• No public details have been provided about:
  • how the contact began
  • whether relatives were present
  • how quickly store staff intervened

As with any criminal case, Velasquez Gomez is presumed innocent unless a court finds him guilty or he enters a plea.

Community context and enforcement patterns

The arrest comes during a month of intense enforcement on Long Island. Immigrant advocates say ICE officers have appeared more frequently at homes, courthouses, and even near schools.

• Ahmad Perez, founder of local group Islip Forward, has documented what he describes as daily sightings and detentions throughout November 2025, including cases involving students and long-settled workers.
• Analysis by VisaVerge.com suggests this pattern mirrors past periods when federal authorities concentrated resources in specific communities after high-profile crimes — especially when suspects were reported to be in the country without legal status.

The case of Jimmy Harry Velasquez Gomez fits that broader pattern. While ICE has stressed in other statements that it focuses on people with criminal records or pending criminal charges, local families and advocates say the surge in enforcement makes many immigrants afraid to:

• report crimes
• show up for court
• send children to school

They worry that a single arrest detainer tied to a serious accusation at a T.J. Maxx could be used to justify much wider sweeps, potentially affecting people whose only immigration problem is an old visa overstay or a missed hearing years ago.

How local jurisdictions respond to detainers

In practice, the detainer means that if a county jail or local police department holds Velasquez Gomez on the state case, officers will face a choice when his criminal custody ends:

1. Release him to the community, or
2. Keep him until ICE agents arrive to take custody

Some New York jurisdictions have limited cooperation with detainer requests unless a judge signs a warrant, arguing that holding someone solely for immigration enforcement can violate state law or constitutional protections. Others continue to honor most detainers, especially when the person is accused of violent or sexual crimes, saying they want to avoid releasing defendants who could pose a risk if the charges are proven.

Missing immigration details and advocates’ concerns

Officials have not publicly disclosed the immigration history or current status of Jimmy Harry Velasquez Gomez, and ICE has not released any additional information beyond the existence of the detainer. That leaves many questions unanswered, including:

• how long he has lived in the country
• whether he has relatives with legal status
• whether he has ever applied for protection or relief in immigration court

Advocates caution that, without those details, the case should not be used to paint all undocumented people as dangerous, even as they acknowledge the deep anger and fear such allegations create for parents of young children.

Important: The absence of publicly available immigration records in this case means the broader community should avoid generalizations about immigrant populations while the legal processes run their course.

Local reactions and impact on daily life

Shoppers who frequent the T.J. Maxx where the alleged assaults took place say the case has changed how they think about everyday errands.

• Parents are more likely to keep children within arm’s reach, even in familiar stores.
• Some shoppers avoid busy weekend shopping hours.
• Local leaders have urged calm while the criminal case proceeds, but they also recognize the deep concern that any allegation of child molestation triggers in a close-knit neighborhood.

For immigrant parents in particular, emotions are mixed: they want strong action against anyone who harms a child, yet they fear that heavy ICE activity could touch their own families, even if they have never been accused of a crime.

Legal and civil-rights implications

Legal advocates expect the case to feed into ongoing court battles over arrest detainer policies. The debate centers on two competing views:

• Civil rights groups argue in lawsuits that holding someone past their normal release time based only on an ICE request can cause wrongful detention when records are wrong.
• Supporters of closer cooperation with ICE say detainers are an important public safety tool, especially in cases involving alleged violent or sexual offenses, like the one against Velasquez Gomez.

For now, the Long Island community watches two systems move in parallel:

1. Criminal courts weighing what happened inside the T.J. Maxx.
2. Federal officers preparing to act afterward, proceeding cautiously.

The outcome of both processes will shape not only this case but also ongoing conversations about the balance between immigration enforcement and community trust.