(GEORGIA) Georgia and Utah move in different directions on Immigration in 2025 as enforcement rises and families brace for change. State actions now shape who gets stopped, who gets detained, and who stays together.
State decisions on 287(g), status checks, and family unity shape daily life now, with new federal orders fueling pressure too.
In March 2025, Governor Brian Kemp directed the Georgia Department of Public Safety to train all 1,100 sworn officers under the federal 287(g) program, which lets state officers help with certain immigration duties in partnership with ICE. Kemp’s move follows President Trump’s January 2025 executive order that calls for wider use of 287(g) across the United States 🇺🇸. The state also enforces the Criminal Alien Track and Report Act of 2024 (effective May 1, 2024), which bans sanctuary policies, requires local agencies to work with federal partners, and mandates immigration status checks during motor vehicle violations.
Supporters argue these steps protect public safety. In a statement, Governor Brian Kemp said, “If you are in our country illegally and committing crimes, you have no place in Georgia.” Opponents warn that these policies invite racial profiling, strain trust with police, and risk breaking apart mixed-status families. With over 10% of Georgia’s population foreign-born and about 1 in 10 residents identifying as Hispanic/Latino, community leaders say the effects are wide and personal.
What does 287(g) mean on the road or at a traffic stop? Under the Criminal Alien Track and Report Act, officers in Georgia must verify immigration status during motor vehicle violations. Because the state does not issue driver’s licenses to undocumented people, even minor traffic issues can now trigger checks, detention, and referrals to ICE. This has raised fear among undocumented residents and mixed-status households, where some family members have legal status and others do not. Local law enforcement agencies risk losing state funding if they refuse to cooperate, and the state has linked its posture to federal policy priorities.
For readers who may be new to the term: the federal 287(g) program lets trained state or local officers perform limited immigration duties, such as checking immigration status and placing detainers after arrests for certain offenses. You can read the official program overview on ICE’s website by visiting the ICE page on the 287(g) program. Supporters say this is a tool to address people who break criminal laws. Critics say it sweeps in people with minor offenses and pulls families into a deportation pipeline.
Georgia lawmakers ended their 2025 session on April 4 (Sine Die). Any bills not passed by that date are dead for the year. No major pro-immigrant bills moved. Advocacy groups had backed measures to expand driver’s license access for all residents and add language access for state services. Those efforts stalled in 2025, while enforcement and cooperation with federal agencies remained the central focus.
Here are the key parts of the Criminal Alien Track and Report Act of 2024 as they function today in Georgia:
– Sanctuary policies are banned.
– Local agencies must seek cooperation agreements with federal partners.
– Officials face penalties if they fail to comply with the law’s requirements.
– Immigration status checks are required for all motor vehicle violations.
For many families, the change feels immediate. Officers trained under 287(g) can verify status during stops and arrests. If an officer suspects a person is undocumented, they may detain and refer the case to ICE for removal proceedings. With more trained officers, advocates expect more detainers and more cases moving into immigration court. Community organizations say this reduces trust and makes people less likely to report crimes, serve as witnesses, or seek help in emergencies.
In Georgia today:
– Over 10% of the population is foreign-born.
– Hispanic/Latino residents are about 1 in 10 Georgians.
– Agencies must verify immigration status during traffic stops, exposing hundreds of thousands of undocumented residents to checks and potential detention.
The economic worries are real as well. Employers in sectors that rely on immigrant labor—like construction, food processing, hospitality, and logistics—fear labor shortages if workers leave the state or avoid public spaces out of fear. The Georgia Budget and Policy Institute has pushed for practical solutions like licenses for all drivers to improve road safety and reduce arrests over paperwork, but 2025 brought no policy shift.
Utah presents a different story. The state has 300,000+ immigrants, with about one-third naturalized, one-third undocumented, and the rest on various visas. Community leaders point to mixed-status families, where U.S. citizens live with noncitizen relatives who have no path to legal status. In 2025, federal changes—especially the Trump administration’s announced reversal of Biden-era humanitarian parole programs—have led to self-deportation and family separations. Utah advocates say they see Venezuelan and other families leaving to avoid the risk of detention or to keep parents and children together in another country.
The Utah Compact, backed by business, faith, and civic leaders, remains a central voice. The Compact supports public safety while opposing policies that split families when not necessary. It also stresses the economic role of immigrants and calls for humane, workable solutions. While the Compact is not a law, it shapes the state’s tone and keeps a broad coalition at the table, even as most immigration power sits with the federal government.
Unlike Georgia, Utah has not passed major new state immigration laws in 2025. Still, the federal policy environment has brought serious change into Utah homes. With no path to legal status for many long-term residents, families report fear, stress, and hard choices. Parents may switch jobs, kids may skip activities, and entire households may plan for a move out of the country to avoid the risk of a sudden separation.
Advocates and critics both make their case in this tense moment:
– Enforcement supporters argue stricter policies deter unlawful entry and protect communities. They support closer state-federal cooperation and say increased checks target criminals.
– Immigrant rights groups warn these policies break trust, encourage racial profiling, and harm mixed-status families, who often include U.S. citizen children. They point to wider impacts on health care, policing, and schools.
– Business and civic leaders in Utah stress the workforce needs in construction, hospitality, and agriculture, and urge balanced, humane approaches to avoid labor gaps and social strain.
As reported by VisaVerge.com, states are leaning hard into their roles within a national system that now prizes tighter cooperation with federal authorities, even as local leaders debate the human costs.
In Georgia, the process works like this on the ground:
1) Training: DPS officers receive ICE instruction for 287(g) duties.
2) Status checks: Officers verify immigration status during traffic stops and certain arrests.
3) Referral and detention: People suspected of being undocumented may be held and referred to ICE for removal proceedings.
4) Sanctions: Agencies that resist cooperation risk loss of state funding.
The practical effects in both states show up in daily life:
– In Georgia, more traffic stops can lead to detention and potential deportation, even for minor issues like driving without a license. Community groups report people skipping school events or avoiding medical visits because they fear encounters with police.
– In Utah, families report self-deportation to keep the household intact after federal parole rollbacks. Without a path to legal status, long-time residents keep working, paying taxes, and raising kids, but live with constant uncertainty.
A family scenario shows the stakes. In Georgia, a father who has lived in the state for 12 years drives to work without a license because he cannot get one. A broken tail light leads to a stop, a status check, and a referral to ICE. His U.S. citizen children and spouse face a sudden loss of income, and the case may stretch on for months. In Utah, a mother with temporary relief fears it will end; she and her partner decide to relocate abroad to avoid the risk of arrest, pulling a child out of school to keep the family together.
People often ask what they can do amid these changes. While laws vary and outcomes depend on each case, these steps can help families reduce risk and stay informed:
– Know your rights during traffic stops and at home. You generally don’t have to open the door to an officer without a warrant signed by a judge, unless there’s an emergency. If you’re stopped, you can ask if you’re free to leave.
– Carry key documents when safe to do so. Keep copies of any IDs you have, school records for children, and contact numbers for family and trusted neighbors.
– Create a family plan. Decide who can pick up kids, manage bills, and access medical care if a parent is detained.
– Consult a licensed attorney or a DOJ-recognized legal service provider for case-specific advice. Avoid notarios or unlicensed consultants.
– Stay connected with local community groups and faith organizations. They can share updates, legal clinics, and emergency help.
– Report crimes to local police if you’re a victim or witness. Some departments have outreach teams and language access that can help.
Policy timelines matter as well. In Georgia, the legislative session ended April 4, 2025, and immigration-related bills that did not pass are done for the year. That means no immediate change for driver’s license access, though advocates will keep pushing. In Utah, little has shifted at the state level in 2025, but federal enforcement remains the driver of local impacts.
The broader context ties back to the national stage. President Trump’s early 2025 order pushed for wider use of state-federal cooperation, and Georgia is embracing that approach. Utah’s leaders, guided by the spirit of the Utah Compact, continue to argue for family unity and economic common sense, even while federal policy changes produce tough outcomes for local families.
Looking ahead, Georgia is expected to hold its course on enforcement. Community groups plan legal challenges and campaigns that spotlight racial profiling concerns and the costs of separating families. Employers will watch labor trends closely and may adjust hiring, training, and scheduling. Police departments will keep balancing traffic safety with community trust.
In Utah, the focus will remain on keeping families together, stabilizing schools and workplaces, and urging federal lawmakers to consider reforms that reflect the state’s values. Business, faith, and civic leaders are likely to resist any state attempt to mirror Georgia’s strict model, pointing to the long-term community and economic costs.
For families, the next months will be about preparation and information. Keep records up to date, set a family plan, and seek trustworthy legal help. For employers, supporting language access, clear HR policies, and employee guidance can reduce confusion and build trust. For local leaders, ongoing dialogue with residents can maintain safety and encourage people to report crimes and use public services.
The debate over Immigration in 2025 isn’t just about laws and orders. It’s about parents getting to work safely, kids getting to school, and communities deciding what kind of future they want. Georgia doubles down on a strict path. Utah holds to a community-first approach, even as federal shifts test that stance. In both places, the choices leaders make now will echo in homes, workplaces, and schools for years to come.
This Article in a Nutshell
