(ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA) Federal agents carrying out an ICE operation at the Bro-Tex facility in St. Paul, Minnesota, on November 18, 2025, were met by a crowd of protesters who tried to block parts of the enforcement action, leading to tense confrontations and several detentions outside the industrial building. The clash, which unfolded in the middle of a workday, quickly turned the normally quiet stretch of Hampden Avenue into a scene of flashing lights, shouted slogans, and heavy federal presence.
What happened on the scene

According to early reports based on video from the scene, armed agents wearing ICE, FBI, and DEA vests gathered near the Bro-Tex LLC building at 830 N. Hampden Ave. as the federal operation began. Protesters moved toward the entrance area and nearby sidewalks, chanting and shouting at officers as they tried to see who was being taken into custody.
Some people in the crowd attempted to get closer to the vans where detainees were being placed, while others filmed the encounter on their phones, documenting each step of the ICE operation for social media and local groups.
Local police acknowledged that St. Paul officers were present during the incident, saying they responded to assist with crowd control and public safety while federal agencies carried out their work. Footage from the scene shows lines of officers standing between the protesters and the Bro-Tex building, with loud, emotional exchanges between community members and law enforcement.
In several clips, people can be heard demanding to know who was being detained and whether anyone inside the facility had been targeted for immigration enforcement rather than criminal charges.
Detentions, unknowns, and official silence
Witness recordings and early descriptions from the ground indicate that several individuals were detained and transported in vans during the enforcement action, though it is not yet clear whether they were workers, protesters, or people who arrived later.
Federal officials have not publicly released the number of people taken into custody or the specific grounds for those detentions. No detailed charging documents have been made public, and as of the latest reporting, there has been no full explanation of whether the enforcement focused on immigration violations, criminal investigations, or a combination of both.
Officials have also not explained why agents from three separate federal agencies appeared at the Bro-Tex facility at the same time.
Agencies involved
It is not uncommon for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Drug Enforcement Administration to cooperate on joint operations, especially when they suspect criminal activity that may involve multiple federal jurisdictions.
- According to the official description of ICE’s role on the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement website, the agency is responsible for enforcing immigration laws inside the United States 🇺🇸 and often works with other federal partners during complex investigations.
- Still, the mixture of uniforms and armed agents outside a single workplace can be deeply alarming for local residents and workers who may not know which agency is doing what, or why.
Below is a quick reference of the agencies seen at the scene:
| Agency acronym | Full name |
|---|---|
| ICE | U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement |
| FBI | Federal Bureau of Investigation |
| DEA | Drug Enforcement Administration |
Unclear scope and community impact
Community concern has been sharpened by the fact that the exact nature of the enforcement action remains unclear. Available reports do not say whether agents entered the building looking for specific individuals, served warrants related to company records, or were seeking evidence of other federal crimes.
Officials have also not released information about possible injuries, though video from the scene does not show obvious medical emergencies or fire department involvement during the visible part of the confrontation.
What is clear from the recordings is the high level of emotion in the crowd, with people shouting at officers to “let them go” and accusing federal agents of tearing families apart.
Local activists and residents in St. Paul, Minnesota, have watched similar operations in other parts of the country with growing unease. Large worksite actions in previous years, sometimes involving hundreds of workers, have left children stranded at schools, disrupted small businesses, and pushed mixed-status families—where some members are citizens and others are not—into sudden crisis.
While there is no indication that the Bro-Tex action was on that scale, the visible detentions and the show of force outside a familiar local employer have already raised questions about how federal enforcement priorities are being carried out on the ground.
VisaVerge.com reports that communities across the Midwest have seen an uptick in concern whenever rumors spread about planned ICE arrests, even when many of those rumors later turn out to be inaccurate or exaggerated.
No terrorism link — officials’ clarification
Authorities have stressed that the St. Paul incident is not linked to a separate attack on a Texas ICE facility that drew national attention and led to discussions about terrorism charges in another context. Law enforcement sources and local officials have not pointed to any connection between that case and what happened at the Bro-Tex facility.
This distinction matters because residents often struggle to separate reports of protests, enforcement operations, and violent attacks involving the same agencies. Early clarification that there is no known terrorism link in St. Paul may help keep the focus on what actually occurred outside 830 N. Hampden Ave.: a confrontation between protesters and federal agents during an enforcement action that ended with people in custody and a neighborhood shaken.
Key takeaway: There is no known terrorism connection to the Bro-Tex incident; the event appears to be an enforcement action that resulted in detentions and heightened community concern.
Questions likely to shape the coming days
In the days ahead, key questions are likely to center on:
- Who was detained?
- What charges—if any—do those individuals face?
- Are Bro-Tex LLC or any managers targets of a broader federal inquiry?
- Will detainees be held locally or transferred to immigration detention centers?
- What rights do those detained have to legal counsel and family contact?
Immigration law specialists note that workplace visits by ICE can fall into several categories, ranging from simple audits of employment records to full-scale raids aimed at arresting workers who lack legal status. Without official statements, it is hard for people inside and outside the Bro-Tex facility to know which type of action they just experienced, or how long any related investigation might last.
For workers who may have relatives without legal status, even the possibility of further enforcement can cause long-lasting fear, making them reluctant to travel, drive, or even answer the door at home.
Community response and next steps
Residents and advocates in St. Paul, Minnesota, are now waiting for more detailed public information from federal and local authorities. They want to know:
- How many people the ICE operation took into custody
- Whether detainees will be held in local jails or moved to distant detention centers
- What rights detainees have to speak with lawyers or contact their families
Until those answers arrive, the images of agents in tactical gear, protesters pressed up against police lines, and vans pulling away from the Bro-Tex parking lot will continue to shape public debate about how immigration enforcement is carried out in Minnesota and across the country.
This Article in a Nutshell
Federal agents from ICE, FBI, and DEA executed an enforcement action at Bro-Tex in St. Paul on November 18, 2025, prompting protesters to confront officers outside 830 N. Hampden Ave. Several people were detained and transported in vans, while local police assisted with crowd control. Authorities have not detailed the number of detainees, charges, or whether the operation targeted immigration violations or criminal activity. The community demands transparency about detainee rights, locations of custody, and the investigation’s scope.
