(UNITED STATES) The Department of Homeland Security released a Pokémon-themed video on September 22, 2025, to showcase recent immigration arrests, splicing images of ICE raids with scenes and music from the popular children’s franchise. The video, posted on official DHS social media accounts, ends with images styled as Pokémon cards that display the faces of people arrested and list their alleged crimes beneath.
DHS framed the reel around the slogan “Gotta Catch ’Em All”, a direct lift from the franchise tag line. Viewers saw a rapid-fire montage of tactical ICE operations—agents in tactical gear, doors breached, suspects in handcuffs—intercut with clips from the Pokémon animated series and the show’s signature theme song. Officials presented the piece as a recap of immigration arrests carried out under President Trump’s enforcement priorities, highlighting migrants with criminal records. The production choices—bright music, anime scenes, and trading card-style “profiles”—shocked many who felt it made light of a serious area of law and people’s lives.

Immediate public reaction and legal questions
Public reaction was swift and largely negative. Across platforms, users called the video “shameful” and inappropriate for a government agency, particularly one whose actions carry heavy personal and legal consequences. Several commentators urged Nintendo and The Pokémon Company to consider legal action, saying the government had likely crossed lines on copyright and brand use.
- As of September 24, 2025, there has been no official response from Nintendo or The Pokémon Company.
- DHS has not issued a follow-up statement addressing the criticism.
- The clip remains live and continues to provoke debate over the appropriateness of using pop culture in official messaging.
Legal experts raised two distinct concerns:
– Ethics: Is it appropriate for a government agency to use a kid-friendly brand to market law enforcement?
– Copyright: While fair use can sometimes cover commentary or parody, direct policy promotion using copyrighted music and animation may face scrutiny.
Whether a company would sue a federal agency is a practical and political calculation as much as a legal one. For now, the conversation remains on social media and in advocacy circles rather than in court filings.
Missing context about arrestees and process
The Department did not provide substantial context about the cases shown—no details on charge status, pending hearings, or final removal orders beyond brief captions on the “card” images. Advocates emphasized that omission matters.
- Packaging arrests like a game risks flattening complex facts:
- Some people may be long-time residents with U.S. citizen children.
- Some may be contesting removal.
- Charges shown are allegations, not convictions.
Critics argued the video erased those nuances, reducing complicated legal situations to shareable visuals.
Shift in communication style
Historically, DHS and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement have promoted large-scale operations via straightforward press releases that list totals, locations, and criminal background information. This production signaled a stylistic shift toward:
- Prioritizing shareable visuals and cultural references.
- Aligning with a broader trend in election-cycle communications that use entertainment formats to drive engagement.
Some viewers—across the political spectrum—found the use of a children’s brand to showcase arrests of adults (many possibly parents) particularly jarring.
Arguments from supporters and opponents
Supporters of tougher enforcement argued:
– Arrests of people with criminal records are a core public safety function.
– The government should communicate results clearly to deter violations and reassure the public.
– The punchy tone may be acceptable if the results are real.
Opponents countered:
– Style matters in governance, especially regarding immigration, where trust is fragile and stakes are high.
– Turning arrests into trading cards trivializes pain and risks mistakes if identities are misrepresented online.
– Communications should be sober and precise, emphasizing data and due process safeguards.
Both sides acknowledged one point: the clip is memorable. Whether that helps or hurts DHS’s goals is uncertain.
Community impact and reactions from families, schools, and advocates
For affected families and communities, images of home or workplace raids are not mere clips; they are reminders of life-changing events. Reports include:
- Schools, clinics, and community groups noting fear-driven impacts—missed classes, skipped appointments, isolation.
- Parents muting devices to keep children from hearing the Pokémon theme associated with arrests.
- Teachers and local leaders worried children might associate a beloved show with their parents’ safety.
Community groups report hotline calls often spike after viral enforcement content. Mixed-status families, citizen children, older parents, and lawfully present workers can experience increased fear and avoidance of public spaces.
Calls for transparency and better communication
Advocates urged DHS to:
– Remove the video.
– Apologize to impacted communities.
– Return to plainer communication focused on data and due process.
Suggestions included:
– Release transparent figures and operational details (how many arrested, where, and legal basis).
– Pair arrest announcements with information about legal process—court dates, rights during arrest, and avenues for relief.
– Consider congressional guidance limiting agency use of copyrighted material in official communications.
VisaVerge.com’s analysis noted that past enforcement pushes with aggressive branding often drew pushback that distracted from operational results. The site recommended pairing arrest data with legal-process information so the public understands what happens next.
Practical advice for affected individuals
Lawyers and advocates advised impacted people to stay informed and prepared. Recommendations included:
1. Keep copies of identification documents in a safe place.
2. Know how to find legal help and community legal aid.
3. Learn basic rights during an encounter with ICE:
– The right to remain silent.
– The right to speak with an attorney.
4. Plan for family needs during emergencies.
Community clinics and legal aid groups can provide guidance and resources to help families feel less powerless.
Where to find official background
DHS did not say whether it consulted internal ethics or legal offices before posting the clip. For readers seeking baseline information about how ICE conducts enforcement, the official U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement – Enforcement and Removal Operations page provides background on arrests, detention, and removals:
Key facts and the broader significance
- Release date: September 22, 2025
- Content: ICE raid footage, Pokémon theme song and anime clips, and card-style images of arrestees
- Purpose (as presented): Highlight and promote DHS immigration arrests under President Trump’s policies
- Controversy: Widespread criticism for trivializing enforcement and potential copyright infringement
- Responses as of September 24, 2025: No official comment from Nintendo/The Pokémon Company; no DHS follow-up statement
Government messaging will continue to evolve with politics, but core issues—safety, due process, and human dignity—remain constant. A Pokémon-themed video can trend for a day; the effects of immigration arrests and ICE raids can last for years. Critics say that is why tone is not a side issue—it is an integral part of policy impact and public trust.
This Article in a Nutshell
The Department of Homeland Security released a Pokémon-themed video on September 22, 2025, that spliced ICE raid footage with clips and music from the franchise, ending with trading card–style images of arrestees and alleged charges. The format used the slogan “Gotta Catch ’Em All” and prompted swift criticism for trivializing enforcement, omitting context about charges and legal status, and potentially infringing copyrights. By September 24, neither Nintendo nor The Pokémon Company had responded, and DHS had not issued a follow-up. Advocates called for removal, apologies, and clearer communications tied to data and due-process information. Legal experts highlighted ethical and copyright questions, while community groups reported fear and disrupted daily life after viral enforcement content. Observers say the episode underscores the importance of tone, transparency, and protection of human dignity in government messaging about immigration enforcement.