Dallas ICE Arrests 2025: Most Detainees Without Criminal Convictions

(DALLAS, TEXAS) — Immigrants with pending immigration court cases or ICE supervision in North Texas typically must comply with “check-in” and address-reporting requirements, even if they have no criminal convictions, as ICE arrests in the Dallas region have increasingly included people without conviction records.

A Dallas Morning News analysis of government data reported that 62% of people arrested by ICE in the Dallas region in 2025 had no criminal convictions. The report also described more street-level activity, including arrests at homes, on streets, and during ICE check-ins. Separately, national and Texas-wide figures cited in the same reporting show a rising share of ICE arrests involving people without convictions, and a reduced share originating from county jails.

Against that backdrop, the compliance issue is plain: people in removal proceedings, or under ICE “alternatives to detention” (ATD), must follow their supervision terms and keep their contact information current. Those obligations can affect whether ICE can locate someone for a court date, a reporting appointment, or a removal action. They can also affect eligibility for release on bond or on an order of supervision.

The legal authority behind “check-ins” and address updates

Several legal and regulatory provisions govern reporting and address compliance:

• Address reporting after moving: Many noncitizens must report a change of address to DHS within 10 days. See Address change and INA § 265 and 8 C.F.R. § 265.1.
• Removal-order supervision (“order of supervision”): If a person has a final order and is released, DHS may impose conditions like periodic reporting. See INA § 241(a)(3) and 8 C.F.R. § 241.5.
• ICE alternatives to detention (ATD): ICE may require telephonic reporting, GPS monitoring, or scheduled check-ins as a condition of release. These conditions usually derive from ICE custody and supervision authority under INA § 236 and related regulations and bond practices. See ICE’s information on alternatives to detention at ICE Alternatives to Detention (ATD) fact sheet.

Immigration court has its own address rule as well. People in proceedings must keep EOIR informed, so hearing notices reach them. The EOIR address form is typically Form EOIR-33 (Immigration Court) or the BIA’s change-of-address process on appeal. Failure to update EOIR can result in a hearing notice going to an old address. See the EOIR form page: Form EOIR-33.

What compliance requires in practical terms

In practice, compliance usually means doing three things consistently:

1. Attend every ICE check-in exactly as instructed.
   Check-ins may be in person, by phone, or through an app-based system. Some people are instructed to bring proof of address, pay stubs, or court paperwork.

2. Update your address with DHS and EOIR separately.
   DHS address updates are typically done through the USCIS online change-of-address tool or by filing the required form. EOIR updates are filed with the court handling the case, and separately with DHS counsel in many courts.

3. Keep proof of compliance.
   Save check-in receipts, appointment letters, screenshots of confirmations, and copies of filed forms. If there is later a dispute, documentation matters.

Street-level ICE arrests can occur even for people with no criminal convictions. That makes paper trails and punctual reporting more important and can reduce misunderstandings during routine encounters.

Deadline Callout (Address Changes)
Most noncitizens must report a new address to DHS within 10 days. See INA § 265; 8 C.F.R. § 265.1.
Separately, update EOIR if you are in immigration court.

Filing and notice requirements: where people miss steps

Common compliance failures are administrative, not intentional. In the Dallas area and elsewhere, attorneys report that people often miss one of these steps:

• Updating only USCIS but not EOIR. USCIS and EOIR are separate systems. One update does not automatically reach the other.
• Relying on verbal notice to an ICE officer. Officers may note an address change, but that does not replace required filings.
• Missing check-ins due to work or childcare. ICE can treat a missed appointment as a serious violation. People should seek rescheduling in writing.

Warning Callout (Missed Check-Ins)
Missing a required ICE check-in can trigger detention efforts.
If you cannot attend, contact ICE immediately and document the request.

Consequences of non-compliance

Consequences depend on the person’s status, custody posture, and court stage, but several risks commonly recur:

• Detention risk and ICE arrests. If ICE believes a person is not reporting, ICE may attempt to arrest the person at home, at work, or in the community.
• Bond consequences. A history of missed reporting can be used to argue flight risk in a bond request. Bond decisions are discretionary and fact-specific.
• In absentia removal order. If EOIR sends a hearing notice to an outdated address, a person may miss court and be ordered removed in absentia. See INA § 240(b)(5).
• Criminal exposure for willful failures. Some immigration-related registration failures can carry criminal penalties, depending on facts and charging decisions. See INA § 266.

Even where a person has no criminal convictions, immigration enforcement is civil. ICE can detain for removability allegations, missed hearings, or supervision violations.

Exceptions and “good cause” arguments

There is no broad waiver of address reporting. Still, specific procedures may help in certain situations:

• Rescheduling a check-in. ICE offices sometimes reschedule if a request is prompt and documented. Policies and local practices vary.
• Motions to reopen for in absentia orders. If a person missed court, immigration law allows reopening in certain circumstances. Options may include lack of notice or “exceptional circumstances.” See INA § 240(b)(5)(C). Deadlines can be short, and litigation is technical.
• Bond redetermination or custody review. Some detainees may request review depending on posture, jurisdiction, and DHS authority.

Because these remedies are fact-driven, they are areas where counsel matters most.

Deadline Callout (Missed Court)
An in absentia removal order may be challenged through a motion to reopen.
Deadlines vary by the ground claimed under INA § 240(b)(5)(C). Get legal advice fast.

Tips to maintain compliance in a higher-enforcement environment

Given the reported increase in Dallas ICE arrests and the higher share of arrests involving people with no criminal convictions, good compliance habits can reduce avoidable risk:

• Create a single “immigration calendar.” Track court dates, ICE check-ins, biometrics, and filing deadlines in one place.
• Use stable mailing methods. If housing is unstable, ask counsel about using a reliable mailing address where permitted, and confirm EOIR rules.
• Carry key documents when traveling locally. Keep a photo of hearing notices and proof of filing on your phone.
• Do not sign documents you do not understand. Ask for an interpreter if needed and request copies of anything provided.
• Have an emergency plan. Identify who will contact your lawyer, locate your A-number, and arrange care for children if you are detained.

For people with pending asylum or other relief claims, continued court participation is often essential. A missed hearing can derail a case.

Where to check official information

For court dates and case status, use official EOIR tools and contact information. For DHS address updates and benefit filings, use USCIS resources. For detention and ICE supervision questions, counsel can help determine which office has jurisdiction.

Government sites:
– EOIR
– USCIS

Resources:
– AILA Lawyer Referral

⚖️ Legal Disclaimer: This article provides general information about immigration law and is not legal advice. Immigration cases are highly fact-specific, and laws vary by jurisdiction. Consult a qualified immigration attorney for advice about your specific situation.