(CHICAGO, ILLINOIS) A sweeping federal immigration crackdown centered on “Operation Midway Blitz” has pushed Chicago’s immigrant workforce and their employers into what many describe as the most fearful period since mass workplace raids a decade ago. Since September 2025, immigration officers have carried out aggressive enforcement actions across the Chicago area, targeting workers on their way to jobs, at day-labor corners, and inside warehouses and factories, according to local organizers. The Department of Homeland Security says the operation has led to about 500 detentions, but community groups warn the true number may be higher and still rising.
Enforcement tone and everyday impacts

Immigration lawyers and worker centers say the tone of the second Trump administration’s enforcement in the region is clear: deportation first, questions later. While large, publicized factory raids have been rarer than in previous crackdowns, the constant threat of surprise inspections or home arrests has changed how immigrant workers move through the city.
Many undocumented people now leave home only for work, groceries, or school. Some have stopped using public transit stations they believe are watched by federal agents. Organizers in Latino and other immigrant neighborhoods say they are getting daily calls from families asking what to do if a parent does not come home.
The enforcement pressure is felt most sharply at informal hiring sites and low-wage workplaces, where undocumented day laborers, warehouse workers, cleaners, and restaurant staff often gather before dawn. Rapid response teams report that under Operation Midway Blitz, immigration agents have shown up near these corners and parking lots — sometimes waiting until employers arrive and workers line up, then moving in.
Advocates say this creates a chilling effect that reaches far beyond those actually detained, because stories of a single morning action spread quickly through group chats and local social networks.
“Deportation first, questions later” — a phrase used by lawyers and worker centers to describe the perceived enforcement approach.
Who officials say they’re targeting — and what advocates report
Federal officials argue these efforts focus on people with prior removal orders or criminal records, describing the approach as targeted enforcement. However, immigrant advocates in the Chicago area say they are hearing from increasing numbers of workers with no criminal history who have been swept into detention.
Advocates point to the end of programs that once gave some protection to workers who spoke up about abuse as a turning point. One of the most important of those programs, Deferred Action for Labor Enforcement (DALE), was created to shield undocumented workers who reported labor violations from retaliation and deportation while investigations were underway.
The Trump administration’s decision to end Deferred Action for Labor Enforcement (DALE) has sent a clear signal to many employers, organizers say. Without that protection, workers who report wage theft, unsafe conditions, or harassment now risk being placed directly in the crosshairs of immigration enforcement. Labor advocates describe this as a “green light for exploitation.”
Example incidents reported by organizers:
– A Chicago warehouse manager reportedly told staff that undocumented employees would not receive raises, knowing they were too scared to complain or file a report.
– Similar stories are emerging from construction sites, cleaning crews, and small factories.
Community responses and demands
Worker centers like the Latino Union of Chicago and coalitions such as the Raise the Floor Alliance have been pressing city officials to act. They want formal safe hiring sites where day laborers can wait for jobs without fear of immigration agents surrounding the block.
These groups argue:
– Chicago’s branding as a “welcoming city” means little if workers can be detained on their way to a job or punished for trying to organize.
– National labor protections against employer retaliation are harder to enforce when workers fear deportation.
Actions and requests from advocates include:
1. Establishment of safe, monitored hiring sites for day laborers.
2. Expanded access to legal aid and rapid response teams.
3. Public pressure on city and state officials to strengthen protections.
Economic consequences
The economic shock is visible along Chicago’s Latino business corridors, especially in neighborhoods like Little Village, where storefronts depend heavily on local immigrant customers. Shop owners report revenue losses of 20 to 50 percent since the intensified enforcement began.
Effects described by local businesses:
– Fewer families are going out to eat or holding parties.
– Customers cancel events at the last minute because relatives are afraid to drive across town or gather in large groups.
– Quinceañera dress shops, restaurants, and party supply stores report sharp declines in business tied to fear-driven cancellations.
Key economic context:
– Latino communities contribute more than $100 billion each year to Illinois’ gross domestic product, much of it tied to the Chicago area through consumer spending and small business activity.
– Analysis by VisaVerge.com highlights that these contributions support local jobs, tax revenue, and neighborhood stability.
Table — Selected economic figures
| Item | Figure |
|---|---|
| Approximate detentions reported by DHS | about 500 |
| Reported revenue losses for local businesses | 20–50% |
| Annual contribution of Latino communities to Illinois GDP | more than $100 billion |
Community leaders warn that if fear keeps people home, the damage will stretch well beyond a single enforcement surge.
Legal support, “Know Your Rights,” and mental health
Community groups such as The Resurrection Project have expanded “Know Your Rights” workshops, teaching residents what to do if immigration agents come to their door. These workshops emphasize that people do not have to open the door without a warrant signed by a judge.
Other supports being provided:
– Legal clinics to help families collect key documents and prepare emergency childcare plans.
– Identification of trusted contacts in case a parent is detained.
– Integration of mental health support, as parents and children report trouble sleeping, panic attacks, and constant worry.
Schools, students, and family stability
Schools are also on the front lines of this new climate. Principals and counselors in Chicago public schools say students come to class distracted and afraid their parents may not be home when the final bell rings. Some families have asked schools what will happen if immigration agents appear near campus.
Responses from districts:
– Reviewing policies that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement on school grounds.
– Trying to reassure families that campuses remain safe places for children regardless of immigration status.
Classroom impacts described by educators:
– Younger children drawing pictures of police and immigration vans, asking if they will “take mommy away.”
– High school students who work part-time weighing whether it is safe to keep jobs.
– Many undocumented or mixed-status students reconsidering college plans, questioning whether they will be able to stay long enough to finish a degree.
These fears have started altering conversations at college planning nights and parent-teacher conferences, shifting focus from academic plans and financial aid to worries about family separation and stability.
Local and federal policy tensions
City and state officials find themselves in a complicated position. Illinois has laws meant to limit cooperation with federal civil immigration enforcement, and Chicago promotes long-standing “sanctuary” policies. Yet local governments cannot fully block federal agents from operating on city streets.
Local responses include:
– Expanding access to legal aid.
– Promoting municipal IDs that do not require proof of legal status.
– Reminding residents that local police generally do not ask about immigration status.
Advocates say these steps help but do not erase the fear created by large-scale operations like Operation Midway Blitz.
On the federal side, the Department of Homeland Security maintains that worksite enforcement is an important tool to protect wages and job opportunities for citizens and lawful residents. Its materials emphasize penalties for employers who knowingly hire unauthorized workers and outline procedures for Form I-9 employment verification.
For official information on workplace enforcement, see the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement workplace enforcement page available through ICE workplace enforcement page. Worker advocates in Chicago point out that, in practice, it is often the workers who face the harshest and most immediate consequences.
Legal battles and caseload pressures
Attorneys in the Chicago area report that families swept up in Operation Midway Blitz face complex legal battles, often with little time to find representation. Many detained workers have lived in the United States 🇺🇸 for years, built families, and held steady jobs.
Concerns raised by legal aid groups:
– Without programs like DALE, cases may move faster toward removal, even when detained workers have strong arguments based on family ties or fear of returning to their home countries.
– Legal aid organizations report spiking caseloads and pro bono lawyers struggling to keep up.
Resilience and outlook
For now, the city’s immigrant workforce continues to show the resilience that has long powered Chicago’s restaurants, warehouses, factories, and construction sites. Workers still line up before dawn, though in smaller numbers, and businesses keep their doors open, hoping customers return.
Community groups promise to keep offering:
– Legal guidance.
– Emotional support.
– Public pressure on officials.
But with Operation Midway Blitz ongoing and no sign of a policy shift from Washington, many here believe that 2025 will be remembered as the year fear once again became a daily part of immigrant life in Chicago.
Operation Midway Blitz, active since September 2025, has heightened fear for Chicago’s immigrant workforce. DHS reports about 500 detentions, while community groups warn numbers may be higher. The end of DALE removed protections for workers reporting abuses, increasing exploitation risk. Businesses in Latino neighborhoods report 20–50% revenue drops. Advocates demand safe hiring sites, expanded legal aid, and rapid response teams. Schools, legal services, and mental-health programs are adapting to support affected families amid ongoing enforcement.
