Pregnant Ohio mother files federal lawsuit to stop deportation to Mexico

Key Takeaways

• Pregnant Carmen Guerrero Sandoval faces deportation to Mexico, ordered by ICE for June 3, 2025.
• Her U.S. citizen son with autism relies on special education services unavailable in Mexico.
• The lawsuit argues deportation violates children’s rights including the unborn baby’s birthright citizenship.

A pregnant mother living in Columbus, Ohio, Carmen Guerrero Sandoval, has filed a federal lawsuit in the U.S. District Court. She is fighting to stop her deportation to Mexico. The order tells her to report to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) by June 3, 2025. Her lawyer, George Katchmer, says she has almost run out of legal options in the immigration system but still has a few possible ways forward. This case has drawn attention because it raises important questions about children’s rights, the treatment of immigrant families, and some of the hardest parts of immigration law.

Let’s break down this case, the arguments involved, and why it matters to so many people.

Carmen Guerrero Sandoval’s Story

Carmen Guerrero Sandoval has lived in Ohio for years. She is the mother of a nine-year-old boy who is a U.S. citizen and who has autism. Her son attends public school in Ohio, where he receives special education services. These services help him with his learning and daily needs. Her family relies on these programs for his well-being.

Sandoval is also expecting another child. Her baby is due in October 2025. If this child is born in the United States 🇺🇸, they will get birthright citizenship, which means the baby will be a U.S. citizen by law. This is automatic for almost all children born in the United States 🇺🇸, thanks to the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution.

Despite her long time in the United States 🇺🇸, Sandoval’s request for asylum was denied five years ago. Asylum is a type of protection given by the government to people who say they cannot return to their home country because they fear harm or death. After her asylum bid was turned down, immigration authorities began removal proceedings.

ICE ordered Sandoval to report for removal in June 2025. She now faces deportation—forced removal from the United States 🇺🇸—to Mexico 🇲🇽, her country of birth. This would separate her from her children. Her lawyer argues this is not fair, especially to her children who need her care.

Arguments Presented in U.S. District Court

Carmen Guerrero Sandoval’s lawsuit asks the U.S. District Court to stop her deportation. The legal team makes three main points:

1. Best Interests of the Children: Her nine-year-old son is a U.S. citizen with autism. He receives special education services in Ohio. Her team argues that these services aren’t available in Mexico 🇲🇽, so deportation would make his life much harder. The best interests of the child should be considered. In Ohio, the law says that, when making decisions for children, authorities must do what’s best for the child.

2. Equal Protection: Her children, both the son and her unborn baby, have rights under the Constitution. Her lawyer says her children are not being treated the same as other children in Ohio. If child welfare or juvenile cases are handled with the child’s best interest as the key factor, her lawyer asks why that isn’t applied here. Treating her children differently, he argues, breaks the Equal Protection Clause.

3. Birthright Citizenship and the Rights of the Unborn Child: Her unborn child will get birthright citizenship if born in the United States 🇺🇸, thanks to the Fourteenth Amendment. The lawsuit says forcing Sandoval to leave would prevent the child from being born in the United States 🇺🇸, cutting off that right.

Carmen Guerrero Sandoval’s lawyer, George Katchmer, said, “Carmen has gone through the system, but her children aren’t being considered at all. If you separate this family, you are not acting in the best interest of the child. And if you are not acting in the best interest of a citizen—an Ohio citizen—then you’re treating that child differently for some reason.”

The Ninth Amendment and U.S. Children’s Rights

The lawsuit in the U.S. District Court also mentions the Ninth Amendment, which says that the list of rights in the Constitution is not all the rights people have. The argument here is that children have certain rights to family and care that should be protected, even if those rights aren’t written in detail in the Constitution.

Her legal team claims that deportation would hurt her children’s rights, especially since the nine-year-old son is a U.S. citizen who depends on special education in Ohio and her support as his mother.

Cruel and Unusual Punishment?

Another point raised is about the Eighth Amendment, which bans cruel and unusual punishment. The lawsuit says that forcing Sandoval’s children—especially her son with special needs—to lose their mother’s care and the programs they need in the United States 🇺🇸 is both harsh and unfair.

Wider Legal and Social Context

This case comes at a time of uncertainty around birthright citizenship. On May 15, 2025, the Supreme Court heard arguments related to birthright citizenship. The Justices are expected to decide by the summer of 2025. However, experts think this ruling might look at whether judges can stop government policies across the whole country—not on the birthright citizenship rule itself.

Birthright citizenship means any child born in the United States 🇺🇸 (except for children of foreign diplomats) automatically becomes a U.S. citizen. This is part of the Fourteenth Amendment. There have been debates on whether this rule should be changed or limited.

The outcome of the Supreme Court case could shape immigration law for years to come. If the Court decides judges can’t block government policies nationwide, that may make it harder for people like Sandoval to use the courts to fight deportation by citing their children’s rights.

Children with Special Needs and Immigration

One of the key points in Carmen Guerrero Sandoval’s lawsuit is her son’s autism and need for special services. In the United States 🇺🇸, schools must provide special education programs to children with disabilities. This helps them learn, join activities, and prepare for life. If Sandoval’s son is sent to Mexico 🇲🇽, he may lose access to these programs. The lawsuit says Mexico 🇲🇽 does not have the same resources or level of special education support.

Imagine being a child with autism who has learned to rely on certain teaching methods. Losing those could be hard and even dangerous for his development. Analysis from VisaVerge.com suggests that, in many deportation cases where U.S. citizen children have special needs, courts and immigration officials struggle to balance the rights of parents against the welfare of the child.

Comparing Decisions in Juvenile and Immigration Courts

Sandoval’s lawyer raises a key question: If Ohio courts put the “best interest of the child” first in family and juvenile cases, why shouldn’t immigration courts do the same for U.S. citizen children whose parent faces deportation? Right now, immigration cases often focus only on the status and history of the parent, not the child’s condition or rights.

This lawsuit asks the U.S. District Court to consider the effect that deportation would have on children’s lives, especially those born in the United States 🇺🇸. It pushes the conversation forward about whether U.S. citizen children should be separated from their parents because of immigration rules.

What Is at Stake for Families in Similar Situations?

Many families in the United States 🇺🇸 live with mixed immigration status. For example, parents may not have legal residence, but their children are U.S. citizens because they were born in the country. When immigration laws are enforced, these families can be torn apart. Children may lose their home, school, community, and even access to health and education services.

Sandoval’s case matters because it could set an example for how courts handle similar situations in the future. If the U.S. District Court agrees with her, other families might try to use the same legal defenses to stop deportation and keep families together. If she loses, it may become harder for other families in similar situations to win protection for U.S. citizen children.

Legal Process and Next Steps

The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court in Columbus. This is an important step because federal courts can look at whether someone’s rights have been ignored or violated during deportation cases. The case is now in the hands of a judge, who will review the arguments—from both Sandoval’s lawyer and the government.

If the judge says Sandoval’s rights (or her children’s rights) have been ignored, the court could stop ICE from carrying out the deportation order, at least for now. The judge might ask for more information, review facts about the child’s health and education, and decide whether to let the case go further.

If the court rules against Sandoval, she may have other options, such as appealing the decision. Appeals would go to a higher court, but they can take time and often need new legal arguments.

Possible Outcomes and Broader Impact

1. Court Blocks the Deportation: If the U.S. District Court says the children’s interests should come first, and blocks Carmen Guerrero Sandoval’s removal, this could help other families. It might inspire lawmakers or immigration agencies to think more about U.S. citizen children in future cases.

2. Court Allows the Deportation: If the court sides with the government and allows the deportation, it could set a precedent for how cases like Sandoval’s are handled in the future. Other immigrant parents with U.S. citizen children might find it harder to stop deportations based on their child’s needs.

3. Changes to Immigration Law: This case could drive changes in how U.S. courts and lawmakers look at immigration, especially when children’s well-being is involved. Lawmakers might write new laws, or federal agencies might change the way decisions for mixed-status families are made.

How Officials and the Community Are Responding

Stories like Sandoval’s often spark discussion among lawmakers, advocates, and the general public. Some community groups support her and other immigrant families, asking for changes to the way deportations are handled so families can stay together.

Opponents often argue that immigration laws must be enforced equally and that making exceptions would weaken these rules. Others say keeping families together, especially when there are U.S. citizen children, should be a bigger priority.

Officials at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement say they enforce laws as written. But ICE does have programs and policies that allow them to delay or change deportations in special cases, though it’s not guaranteed. For people unsure of their rights or how the process works, the official ICE website has updates and factual information about removal orders, family concerns, and legal help.

What This Means for Immigrant Families

Carmen Guerrero Sandoval’s case is about more than one family. It speaks to the lives of mixed-status families across the country. As communities grow and change, and as courts and lawmakers debate immigration rules, these cases show the real-life impact immigration laws have on children and families.

It also reminds people to ask tough questions: Should the law focus only on the immigration status of a parent, or should the needs of children who are U.S. citizens be weighed more heavily? Do children in special situations, like those who need ongoing medical or educational support, deserve extra protection?

Conclusion and Looking Forward

As the legal challenge moves through the court system, many families and advocates will be watching closely. The decision in the U.S. District Court could influence other cases and even shape new laws about the rights of U.S. citizen children whose parents face deportation.

Right now, Carmen Guerrero Sandoval’s fate—and that of her children—rests in the balance. While the U.S. District Court considers the lawsuit, her case highlights why so many people care so deeply about immigration law and its impact on families, especially when the stakes are so personal.

Individuals facing similar situations are encouraged to seek proper legal advice. For more information on immigration rules, rights, and helpful resources, VisaVerge.com can be a reliable place to start. As this story shows, understanding your rights and options can make all the difference when your family’s future is on the line.

Learn Today

Deportation → Forced removal of an individual from the United States to their country of origin or another country.
Birthright Citizenship → Automatic citizenship granted to anyone born in the United States under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Asylum → Protection granted to people fleeing their home countries due to persecution, fear of harm, or death.
Equal Protection Clause → A constitutional guarantee that no person or group will be denied equal treatment under the law.
Special Education Services → Educational programs designed to meet the unique needs of students with disabilities such as autism.

This Article in a Nutshell

Carmen Guerrero Sandoval fights deportation to protect her autistic son’s special education. Her unborn child’s birthright citizenship is at risk. The case challenges how immigration courts consider U.S. citizen children’s rights amid complex deportation laws and raises questions about family separation in immigration.
— By VisaVerge.com

Read more:

• Temporary Protected Status Shields Thousands From Deportation
• Deportation process in Germany sees 20% rise as reforms take effect
• Artemis Ghasemzadeh Bill Targets Fast-Track Deportations
• Voluntary Deportation Flight Sends Kids Back to Honduras
• Ximena Arias-Cristobal faces deportation after ICE traffic stop