(MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA) Federal immigration agents arrested 12 Somalis in Minneapolis earlier this week in a targeted immigration operation that officials say is aimed at people living unlawfully in the United States, marking a sharp escalation of enforcement under President Trump’s crackdown policies.
The arrests, confirmed by Department of Homeland Security Public Affairs Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin, follow months of on-the-ground investigations by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Minnesota’s largest city. Agents have been scrutinizing the records and immigration histories of Somali nationals.

Scope of the investigation and arrests
McLaughlin said ICE investigators in Minneapolis have been tracking as many as 500 individuals linked to Somali communities across the city, signaling that the current arrests may represent only an early phase of a broader immigration operation. According to her account, nearly half of the immigration cases examined so far have involved fraud or other efforts to, in her words, “defraud the system.”
Among the 12 Somalis taken into custody is a convicted murderer and gang member, who McLaughlin said had previously been released back onto Minneapolis streets despite his record. She described that earlier decision as a serious public safety failure, arguing that allowing such people to remain in the community amounted to letting them “terrorize people” in neighborhoods that already struggle with crime and poverty.
“They had turned a blind eye… complicit in what is happening to Minneapolis,” McLaughlin said of local leaders (see further context below).
Political context and official statements
The immigration operation has unfolded against a charged political backdrop in Minnesota. McLaughlin, speaking on behalf of the Department of Homeland Security, accused Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis city leaders of failing to address long-running immigration issues tied to Somali communities. She said they had “turned a blind eye” to problems and were “complicit in what is happening to Minneapolis,” framing local policies as too tolerant of people she says should have faced federal enforcement much earlier.
Her comments echo President Trump‘s broader promise to tighten enforcement and remove people living in the country without legal status. The current Department of Homeland Security leadership, including Secretary Noem, has repeatedly emphasized a hard line on immigration. McLaughlin said Noem is “laser-focused” on producing “results” in cities like Minneapolis, presenting the arrests as proof that the administration is following through on its pledge to restore what it calls respect for the rule of law.
Sensitivities and community reaction
Immigration crackdowns involving Somalis in Minneapolis are especially sensitive because the city is home to one of the largest Somali communities in the United States. Previous enforcement sweeps in other parts of the country have drawn protests from civil rights lawyers, who argue that aggressive tactics can:
- Frighten families
- Deter crime reporting
- Push undocumented residents further into the shadows
According to analysis by VisaVerge.com, stepped-up enforcement under President Trump has already led many mixed-status households to limit contact with local authorities, even when they need help.
Community groups in Minneapolis that work with East African immigrants say rapid enforcement actions leave families scrambling for information about relatives and legal options. When arrests happen without warning, spouses, children and employers may not find out for hours that someone has been taken into federal custody. Lawyers who handle deportation defense cases say early access to counsel can matter, especially when long‑time residents have U.S. citizen children, strong community ties or old criminal convictions.
Supporters of the administration, however, argue that the operation simply applies existing law and should make Minneapolis safer for everyone, at least in the short term.
What happens next: removal proceedings and detainee processing
Federal officials stress that those arrested in the latest Minneapolis immigration operation will move into standard removal proceedings overseen by immigration courts.
Key steps in the federal process:
- ICE transfers detainees to holding facilities while government lawyers prepare charging documents that set out alleged violations of immigration law.
- Charging documents are filed and removal proceedings are initiated.
- People in removal proceedings can ask an immigration judge for relief, such as asylum or other protection.
- Many remain detained while their cases move forward; early legal access can affect outcomes.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, whose work is described on its official website at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, typically handles these transfers and detention procedures.
Investigative methods described
According to McLaughlin, ICE teams spent months in Minneapolis building cases before moving to arrest the first group of 12 Somalis. That preparation usually involves:
- Checking immigration files
- Reviewing criminal records
- Comparing fingerprints
- Conducting surveillance to confirm residence or workplace
Once agents believe they have gathered enough proof that someone is removable, supervisors can authorize targeted arrests. These arrests may occur at homes, workplaces, schools, or during traffic stops. Officials did not specify where this week’s arrests took place, or whether any additional people were detained and later released.
Fraud claims and impact on communities
McLaughlin’s claim that nearly half of the Minneapolis cases under review involve fraud underscores how central document integrity and truthful applications have become for federal agencies. While she did not give detailed examples from the current operation, immigration fraud can range from:
- False statements on asylum forms
- Sham marriages arranged solely to gain legal status
Officials argue that such abuse harms those who follow the rules, including many Somalis who have gained refugee or lawful permanent resident status through regular channels.
Broader federal-local tensions
The sharp criticism directed at Governor Walz and Minneapolis leaders also reflects wider tensions between local governments and federal authorities over immigration enforcement. Around the country, some cities have adopted policies that limit cooperation with ICE, arguing police should focus on local crime rather than act as extensions of federal immigration services.
- Supporters of local non-cooperation policies say these measures build trust so victims, including undocumented Somalis, feel safer reporting violence or exploitation.
- The Trump administration has repeatedly portrayed these approaches as soft on crime and used operations like the one in Minneapolis to argue that tougher partnerships are needed.
Possible next steps and community outlook
With up to 500 people reportedly under investigation in Minneapolis, McLaughlin’s remarks suggest the 12 arrests announced so far may not be the last. She did not outline a timeline for additional actions but said Homeland Security intends to keep pressure on what it views as problem areas.
For Somali families who have built lives in Minnesota, the prospect of more arrests adds to a sense of uncertainty that has grown under President Trump. Supporters of the administration argue the operation enforces existing law and may improve short-term safety. Critics warn of chilling effects on immigrant communities and potential erosion of trust between residents and local authorities.
Key takeaway: This operation reflects an intensifying federal enforcement stance, raises concerns about community impact and civil rights, and likely foreshadows additional targeted action in Minneapolis unless local-federal dynamics change.
Federal agents arrested 12 Somalis in Minneapolis after months of ICE investigations targeting up to 500 individuals. DHS officials allege nearly half the cases reviewed involve fraud or other immigration violations. Among those detained is a convicted murderer and gang member, which officials cite as a public safety failure. Community leaders warn such operations can frighten families, reduce cooperation with police, and harm trust. Detainees will enter standard removal proceedings and may pursue legal relief including asylum.
